GM High Tech Performance vs. Chevy High Performance
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GM High Tech Performance vs. Chevy High Performance
I plan on subscribing to Camaro Performers, but I wouldn't mind having a second subscription too. GMHTP and CHP both seem to be great magazines but which one has the most 4th Gen (or even better yet LT1) related articles?
Or is one simply way better than the other?
Or is one simply way better than the other?
#3
GMHTP= LSxMonthly, although they will have more articles pertaining to LT1's every now and then. You have to figure that any suspension articles will also apply to LT1 cars even if they perform the stuff on an LS1.
Chevy High Performance is a kick-*** magazine though.
Chevy High Performance is a kick-*** magazine though.
#6
I subscribe to both (as well as Camaro Performers). I definitely like GMHTP better because I like late model stuff WAY better than the older stuff. The older muscle cars are definitely cool, but I'm just not as interested in them.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like I'll be going with GMHTP. I was actually leaning towards CHP because it comes out monthly compared to GMHTP and Camaro Performers only come out 9 times a year.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whatever one doesn't promote all the marketing BS, which I know Chevy High performance is loaded with. Nothing like taking a LT1 caprice, throwing all sorts of edelbrock garbage at it, and then it only running high 13s....
#16
TECH Apprentice
I get both of them, and like them both. Its hard to say which one is best. I personally like CHP because it has more technical articles. I seem to learn more from it. Im not really into all the bolt-on dyno articles because correction factors can be jacked with to make it look like their making lots of power. Not sayin thats what happens but im not putting it past them.
#17
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like GMHTP personally. Since I subscribed I've gotten 3 issues and each one had an article on the LT1. In one of the articles they tested the Edelbrock LT1 intake and said it wasn't worth buying because it didn't show any gains in Hp. It's nice to see they didn't mark out to Edelbrock. But it is heavily LSX based, not as much as Camaro Performers which should be named " '67-'69 but mainly '69 Camaro Performers" is 1st Gen based.