EEHack 4.0 Release
#41
another new beta, the big news is it has access to TONS of data. ABS/SIR will be added soon and should (sadly) obsolete scan9495 for most people.
see details here: http://fbodytech.com/eehack-4-5-beta/
would appreciate people testing it out, there are bugs to be found for sure... (don't worry, i didn't do anything sketchy to the flash routine)
see details here: http://fbodytech.com/eehack-4-5-beta/
would appreciate people testing it out, there are bugs to be found for sure... (don't worry, i didn't do anything sketchy to the flash routine)
#42
oh! one thing i really really really really really need is a corvette user to test this out
but WITHOUT installing the passive datastream patches that i insert into my flash routine (i.e. uncheck install patches)
this version has a bunch of transitional corvette obd2-on-obd1 error checking crap in it and i'd really like to see if it works
once you install the patch it nerfs some of the 'extended' obd-2 error output since no real tuner uses it anyway.
but WITHOUT installing the passive datastream patches that i insert into my flash routine (i.e. uncheck install patches)
this version has a bunch of transitional corvette obd2-on-obd1 error checking crap in it and i'd really like to see if it works
once you install the patch it nerfs some of the 'extended' obd-2 error output since no real tuner uses it anyway.
#43
Steve, I would have a suggestion to the program. I have been recording multiple datalogs and I find myself making notes on a paper about the specific log I have pulled up.
The issue is that when I am looking back and forth between logs, the only area I have to look at in which to reference what log file i am looking at it is the File Management "load" drop down which also truncates the file name if it is long.
Would there be a possibility to have the file name show up in the main popup window bar similar to how Tuner Pro does it? Also being able to see the file name that is open when in the "Graph" tab would help too.
Just an opinion as I am going through using this.
The issue is that when I am looking back and forth between logs, the only area I have to look at in which to reference what log file i am looking at it is the File Management "load" drop down which also truncates the file name if it is long.
Would there be a possibility to have the file name show up in the main popup window bar similar to how Tuner Pro does it? Also being able to see the file name that is open when in the "Graph" tab would help too.
Just an opinion as I am going through using this.
#44
i'll think about that, thanks. the multiple log interface is fairly new.
#45
This is an awesome program - thank you for all your hard work! I was able to connect to my 95 Z28 without issue, pull down the existing PCM bin and flash a new firmware that was generated using your "Free Online Tuning Service" generator. Worked great!
#46
This is an awesome program - thank you for all your hard work! I was able to connect to my 95 Z28 without issue, pull down the existing PCM bin and flash a new firmware that was generated using your "Free Online Tuning Service" generator. Worked great!
#47
#48
now packaging an installer-free eehack for 64 bit linux:
http://fbodytech.com/now-packaging-linux64-build/
http://fbodytech.com/now-packaging-linux64-build/
#51
It's been working great so far. Is there a way to copy my analysis table though? I've been trying ctrl C and nothing works.. trying to transfer data over to Tunerpro. 4
Another thing is a buddy of mine has the 4.5 and it crashes on him, keeping me from downloading the newest update, is that a bug or is it in the computer of his?
Another thing is a buddy of mine has the 4.5 and it crashes on him, keeping me from downloading the newest update, is that a bug or is it in the computer of his?
#52
Is there a way to copy my analysis table though?
Another thing is a buddy of mine has the 4.5 and it crashes on him, keeping me from downloading the newest update, is that a bug or is it in the computer of his?
#55
TECH Regular
/bump
Any update/betas for us B-body/Caprice folks? I can't seem to get this program to connect correctly. Going to start pulling fuses to see if I can quiet down the datastream.
Any update/betas for us B-body/Caprice folks? I can't seem to get this program to connect correctly. Going to start pulling fuses to see if I can quiet down the datastream.
#56
#57
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Haverhill Ma
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I posted this on ltxtech but found this so probably makes more sense here.
I'm trying to figure out if I did this right, had a pain in the *** day at the track trying to dial in AFR on 110. So, I've had my LC-1 wired to a simple digital gauge all along and kind of tuned my afr by eyeballing the gauge on WOT pulls, seemed to work fine until I decided to wire the LC-1 to the AC pressure sensor to get a more accurate reading and tune. I just disconnected the signal wire from the LC-1 and extended it into the engine bay and spliced to the red/black wire on the AC pressure sensor. Then in my $EE hack settings I enabled the AC Pressure input, not pin D27. Is this the correct settings / wiring? I figured, the LC-1 is already grounded so I shouldn't have needed to extend the LC-1 ground wire to the AC pressure sensor ground wire, or am I wrong. The reason I question this is I always saw a slight fluctuation through the 12.0-12.9:1 range via my gauge, and now through the $EE hack datalogs at the track I was seeing a AFR of 12.6 (which i assume is commanded) and the WB was reading 10.7-11.5!!! So thanks to my rush, last weekend I was running 12.30's at 108 with bolt ons full interior and 93 and went SLOWER on 110 and a gutted interior (-~180 lbs). Fail.
I'm trying to figure out if I did this right, had a pain in the *** day at the track trying to dial in AFR on 110. So, I've had my LC-1 wired to a simple digital gauge all along and kind of tuned my afr by eyeballing the gauge on WOT pulls, seemed to work fine until I decided to wire the LC-1 to the AC pressure sensor to get a more accurate reading and tune. I just disconnected the signal wire from the LC-1 and extended it into the engine bay and spliced to the red/black wire on the AC pressure sensor. Then in my $EE hack settings I enabled the AC Pressure input, not pin D27. Is this the correct settings / wiring? I figured, the LC-1 is already grounded so I shouldn't have needed to extend the LC-1 ground wire to the AC pressure sensor ground wire, or am I wrong. The reason I question this is I always saw a slight fluctuation through the 12.0-12.9:1 range via my gauge, and now through the $EE hack datalogs at the track I was seeing a AFR of 12.6 (which i assume is commanded) and the WB was reading 10.7-11.5!!! So thanks to my rush, last weekend I was running 12.30's at 108 with bolt ons full interior and 93 and went SLOWER on 110 and a gutted interior (-~180 lbs). Fail.
#58
Anyone using this setup running e85? They started selling it right by my house so I really want use it for my turbo build.
I downloaded it to look it over and tried using the bin generator, its not working for me. Get a server 500 error. Am I doing something wrong or is it just down?
I downloaded it to look it over and tried using the bin generator, its not working for me. Get a server 500 error. Am I doing something wrong or is it just down?
#59
it's just down right now, and i've been to busy to figure out what the hell is wrong. my webserver provider's error logging interface is also a bit broken right now. i'll get to it eventually.
e85 does work but the auto bin generator version doesn't work well. i did an E85 conversion for a guy once
just get tunerpro with my XDF
change these tables to 9.765; the stoich afr target table (all four cells) and the PE AFR base
then multiply the entire open loop afr table by 0.666 or so to get it in range
you probably also have to screw around with the startup afr tables a bit, but in our case it stumbled for a sec then ran fine.
e85 does work but the auto bin generator version doesn't work well. i did an E85 conversion for a guy once
just get tunerpro with my XDF
change these tables to 9.765; the stoich afr target table (all four cells) and the PE AFR base
then multiply the entire open loop afr table by 0.666 or so to get it in range
you probably also have to screw around with the startup afr tables a bit, but in our case it stumbled for a sec then ran fine.