2JAWZ

iTrader: (1)

Which one would be a better pick? Dependability, performance, longevity etc.

Shownomercy

iTrader: (1)

There is no answer to this.

A turbo is more user intensive on making sure it lives long, whereas a blower is a self contained bolt on essentially.

Blower kits are easy to find and install, turbo kits... are not.

Either way, the real question is how much you have to spend.

Vicious95Z28

iTrader: (1)

For me...If money weren't an issue, turbo. Better yet, turbos.

Blackbirdws6

iTrader: (7)

Superchargers tend to be generally easier to maintain and build. Turbo kits that are well engineered are tough to source and usually require more installer savvy. What are your goals and how much are you looking to spend?

MonmouthCtyLS7

iTrader: (6)

Dependability depends on the quality of the parts used and how well thought out/put together the build is. Most blower setups come in kits and most turbo setups are custom. Neither are cheap if done right. Some feel Turbo's are more efficient.

moehorsepower

iTrader: (3)

I ran a supercharger for a few years then switched to Turbo, yes plumbing is a PITA but I would never go back to a supercharger, all being equal, I made more horsepower with less boost on the Turbo..

2JAWZ

iTrader: (1)

I'm at about 427 hp and would like to get to about 600. Cost limited to 10K. A guy in NC builds a twin turbo setup for our cars and even drives a streetable 1000 hp WS6. Starting next summer looking to get into a build just need to research more and device which will be better for my use.