Mcleod Street twin HP loss?
#1
Mcleod Street twin HP loss?
Just wondering if the weight of the Street twin actually causes a HP/TQ loss to the rear tires on the dyno.
Seems ever since I put this clutch in the car has dynoed about 8.5hp/6rwtq less than b4.
Anyone have a clue if this it true. Also what is the weight difference between stock and a Street twin.
Thanks
Seems ever since I put this clutch in the car has dynoed about 8.5hp/6rwtq less than b4.
Anyone have a clue if this it true. Also what is the weight difference between stock and a Street twin.
Thanks
#5
FormerVendor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just wondering if the weight of the Street twin actually causes a HP/TQ loss to the rear tires on the dyno.
Seems ever since I put this clutch in the car has dynoed about 8.5hp/6rwtq less than b4.
Anyone have a clue if this it true. Also what is the weight difference between stock and a Street twin.
Thanks
Seems ever since I put this clutch in the car has dynoed about 8.5hp/6rwtq less than b4.
Anyone have a clue if this it true. Also what is the weight difference between stock and a Street twin.
Thanks
#6
Numbers were RWHP/TQ but what your saying its the clutch. Thats fine since Im gonna spray the car and wanted the best clutch possible. Just was wondering if I should start looking other places for the lost power. I know its like 20 extra pounds on the crank wich lead me to believe thats what was goin on.