treemonster

somebody told me today that ls1's are rated at the rear wheels? is that true? if it is i am getting off my *** to buy one for sure 2morrow asap.

PigTerdT/A

ttt ttt ttt

treemonster

?????

Badzracing

iTrader: (12)

no...they are factory rated as fwhp

2MuchRiceMakesMeSick

No but they can be pretty easily. Buy one and find out

luvmeZ28

iTrader: (3)

arent they rated at like 310? ive seen alot of LS1s put down around that on the dyno.

blkbird_WS-6

iTrader: (14)

I have a 02 Trans Am WS-6, the factory rating is 325 hp at the crank. It puts down close to 310 rwhp. If you consider the "drivetrain loss" from the factory rating, then you can see that they are underated at the crank.

B-MAN

Stock they put down between 298 and 311 rwhp on average from 1998-2002, remember than can be a occasional one that might be a factory freak.

treemonster

i know they are underrated from the factorty. just like my 03 cobra which dynoed consecutively 367,366,and 371 rwhp. as u can see thats well over a 390 hp flywheel rating. the thing is somebody told me they are rated as rwhp so i honestly don't believe it.

Racehead

Mine was rated at 325 fwhp and put down 315 rwhp so the factory ratings are definitely off, mine would've been closer to about 365 fwhp. 40 fwhp over stock is a very welcome thing to have

ls1fbod

"""86' Mustang GT w/03 Cobra wheels T5 and a sweet revving 302

89' notchback g13 classified

1992 white LX Notchback escort ****
Est. 90 FWHP 100 FWTQ

"weird no ls1's for an ls1 site"

I'll be back, I'm Wayne Brady Bitch """

Sweet Cars, LOL