What table on LS1Edit to delete TQ management??
09-30-2003, 12:24 AM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What table on LS1Edit to delete TQ management?? Everyone talks about removing and deleting torque management on cars.
Whats is the full/correct way to eliminate it on ls1edit in simple terms?? What table, what changes.
I set max torque to 639 and nothing else. what other table do i need to modify.
Whats is the full/correct way to eliminate it on ls1edit in simple terms?? What table, what changes.
I set max torque to 639 and nothing else. what other table do i need to modify.
09-30-2003, 10:27 PM
#3
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SILSBEE TX
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: What table on LS1Edit to delete TQ management?? Delete Torque Management:
a. Go to Trans Calibration / A4 Shift Firmness, Tq. reduction and zero-out the table.
b. Trans Calibration / A4 Shift Firmness / Up-shift Tq. Reduction and zero-out values.
c. Engine / Ignition / Max Tq set to 639 ( do not set over this)
d. Engine / Ignition / Tq. Reduction zero it out.
PS: I like to play it safe, i did not set all tables to 0 , only reduce all by 75 percent, this made nite to day differance on my car running ST 3500, just my .02 Johnny
a. Go to Trans Calibration / A4 Shift Firmness, Tq. reduction and zero-out the table.
b. Trans Calibration / A4 Shift Firmness / Up-shift Tq. Reduction and zero-out values.
c. Engine / Ignition / Max Tq set to 639 ( do not set over this)
d. Engine / Ignition / Tq. Reduction zero it out.
PS: I like to play it safe, i did not set all tables to 0 , only reduce all by 75 percent, this made nite to day differance on my car running ST 3500, just my .02 Johnny
09-30-2003, 10:30 PM
#4
TECH Senior Member
Re: What table on LS1Edit to delete TQ management?? ok... i have a torque management question.... i remember way back when (when LS1 Edit first came out) people were talkin about also changing the spark retard limit table ... so does this not apply any longer or was it incorrect info?