PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

96 355 LT-1 running rich, need some ideas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2010, 10:18 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 96 355 LT-1 running rich, need some ideas

Hey guys figured I would post up on here and see if you can help me out with a friends car. It is running God awful rich. When he brought it over I could barely get it to start, found the TPS and idle adjustment screw not right, set them correctly and it would fire on the first bump. Still running rich though and it would never go into closed loop, at all. ECT sensor is working correctly as it is rising like it should. It tried to go to closed loop for about 2 seconds today and bounced right back out to openloop.


There has got to be something missing. Here is a ist of things that the scan revealed as well as the the tune that is in it.

- Tune: Seems to be correct for a mail order LT-4 hotcam tune, but my buddy changed the rockers to 1.6 ratio units, shouldn't matter as I think that he just had the 1.5's on for first start up. He had a shop put in the rockers for him though, so really not sure if they are adjusted right. Also the cylinder volume number is wrong as it is set right now, too low, for being a 355, would this matter much?
- CEL's: this is a T56 car and the tune is for an automatic car with all the diag codes that are set to show up for an auto trans. Right now it has 3>2 solenoid code 84, but there is no AT in it so that explains it. I will flash those codes out of the PCD, but would that make it stay in OL? I wouldn't think so but something to mention.
- As far as running, it really runs rough, motor vibrating quite a bit for just an aluminum headed LT4 hot cam motor, I would think that it would run like that. Not sure though. But you rev it and it revs fine, besides the fact that it is running so rich.
Also some notes on above, I know that one of the O2 sensors isn't swinging like it should hence no closed loop operation. But this thing is running damn rough, almost like firing order is off or the rockers are adjusted wrong or something.

Also note I changed the tune to reflect what changes I felt need to be made with it, i.e. cylinder volume and such.

This is what I changed

- bumped cylinder volume from factory setting to 726.22 for being a 355
-subtracted .31 off the injector flow rate to a value of 31.69 for Ford 30 lb SVO's
- changed Min Coolant Temp for CAT protect to max value since there aren't any CAT's on the car
- bumped min coolant temp to enable air pump to max as there isn't an air pump on the car.
- Bumped CAT overtemp Threshold low, mid and high baro to max, since there are no CAT's on the car
- on the switch table, I deselected "TCC EnableDisable" "TCC release at low TPS" " TCC Release with rapid TPS decrease" " Downshift turns TCC Off" "MAF System Diagnostic, error 48" "TCC control feedback diag error 83" "3>2 downshift feedback error 84" and " shift light diagnostic, error 91"
Selected Fan 2 Diagnostic Error 78.

Loaded the program and it wouldn't start, blew smoke out of the intake or the air filter, WTF nothing that I changed in my eyes would have that big of an affect on something like that, reloaded the original flash and it fired up, though there was extend cranking due to being pig rich.

One thing to note it has a BBK 58MM throttle body as well. Just trying to do a friend a favor and I am lost as to why it would be running like this, and really idling at 1K it runs rough, like shaking the whole car rough, I could shoot a vid of it I guess. I doublechecked the firing order and connections to the optiand they are good.

I guess I can try to reload the original tune that I modified back into it and see what happens. I don't know any thoughts on what else to check.

Oh on another note and not sure why this is, but I can go out there right now and it will fire right up, if I turn it off and try and fire it again you have to give it a bit of gas and then it stumbles to life.

Talked with a friend on another forum and he suggested double checking some of the tables, this was the result of this conversation.

Looking at the tables Inector offset vs. voltage all teh usec values as compared to my cars tune and another tune that I have have been adjusted 183 usec higher than normal, the only values that weren't changed was 3.2, 4.8, 5.2, 5.6 voltages

No difference between my factory injectors on my car tune and his in the "Low Pulse width Injector Offest Adder" table.

I did notice that the crank spark advance vs. coolant table has been changed from factory or from the tune that I have in my car. Pretty drastically as far as much as 6 degrees @ 20 4.0 degrees @ 32,44,and 56 and so on, this is more advance that has been added. looking at a hotcam tune that I got online, there is a huge different there as well. I was thinking that this table could be a factor as usually smoke out the intake would intake to far advanced or retarded, right?

As far as closed throttle timing at 400 and 800 rpm it is 8 degrees higher than a hotcam tune I am looking at. it is set at 27 degrees which I think is really damn high.

I also looked at the datamaster log that I took of it idling for a bit last night after I reloaded the tune in it and noticed at idle it is pulling 75-90 kpa on the MAP @ 50 degrees C and looking at the open loop table vs cool vs map it is trying to hold and pretty rich 11.3 afr , just something else that I noticed

Then I changed the tune and it fired immediately, working over the closed TPS timing stuff, but it is still just dumping fuel at it. but the idle hunts alot now, I don't know. I did ntice that the opti vent line was off going to the intake so I plugged that in, maybe it has something to do with the idle fluctuating ? I dont' know.

I also did notice from the datalog that I ran on the car that the INJ DC is exactly twice as much as my car (which is a regular bolt on LT-1 without a 355 lt1 of course) as well as BPW mS at the same RPM, would that little variance in cam and bore cause that? The MAP value seems really high for idle as well. 70-90 KPA where as mine is 33 at the same RPM.

Any guidance would be great, thanks.

Thanks in advance.

Mike
Old 11-08-2010, 03:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Start with the basics. If you aren't sure the valves are set properly there is a place to start. Probably should put in a fresh set of spark plugs because the ones in there have been fuel fouled. Make sure the ignition wires are on the right cyls and not arcing out somewhere. Put a stock tune in the pcm with only the injector data changed. A hotcam should at least be able to run on that. Get it running before screwing around with the tune anymore. Does it have a stock MAF?
Old 11-08-2010, 03:56 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yep stock MAF, good call on the tune didn't even think about that. But I will check the rocker adjustment tomorrow sometime and report on what I find. I came to the conclusion last night that it wasn't the tune. The tune that was in it was a BH tune, and is pretty good to have a start off point with.
The wires are good I check those last night, and plugs you are right need to be changed that is for sure.
I also came to the factor that pulling 70-90 kPa at idle isn't really right with a hotcam, I could see 40 or so, since it is different than stock, but it is acting like it has a cam with huge overlap in it.
The only thing that I changed in the tune was the autotrans stuff as far as codes, and the Closed TPS timing at 400 and 800 to less advanced.
Thanks for the reply, I will let you know what I find, I guess it was just the basis of I wanted to make sure I was on the right track.

Mike
Old 11-08-2010, 05:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You only changed that in the tune but you don't know what someone else already messed with thats why I said to start fresh. Good luck!
Old 11-08-2010, 06:57 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah isn't that the truth. I talked to my buddy as I thought I was going to do him a favor and figure out what was going on with the car for him, but it looks like he wants to yank the motor and build it up again, I don't know. Learning experience I guess, thanks for the help.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.