2009 Dodge Challenger will start at...
#24
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well mustangs are ugly...have shitty *** performance and some of the models are ridiculously expensive for the performance they offer and people still buy them...so i think that the camaro's chances are pretty damn good.
#25
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well your right but when gm was making the camaro and firebirds the mustang gt's were way cheaper than the f bodys and the cobra of its time 02 and back had almost the same performance and were just a little cheaper. The mustang has had the pony car class all to it self, dodge still poses no threat(performance wise) the gt500 is a way better performer than the srt8 challenger in every way except stoping the challenger stopped one foot faster.
I would take a gt500 over a challenger any day of the week. I dont even think the challenger RT will break into the 13s, but I'll just have to wait and see. When I look at a car I mostly look at performance, thats why I like f-bodies so much the price/performance ratio is great, not to mention I think they look mean as hell.
I am just waiting for that new camaro to see what its like, to me its by far the best looking, I just wanna see the performance.
I would take a gt500 over a challenger any day of the week. I dont even think the challenger RT will break into the 13s, but I'll just have to wait and see. When I look at a car I mostly look at performance, thats why I like f-bodies so much the price/performance ratio is great, not to mention I think they look mean as hell.
I am just waiting for that new camaro to see what its like, to me its by far the best looking, I just wanna see the performance.
Last edited by carbonfiberbird; 06-11-2008 at 02:19 AM.