Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Crank weights 6.0 vs LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 12:34 AM
  #1  
bigeller's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default Crank weights 6.0 vs LS1

It's my understanding that the 6.0L cranks are solid while the LS1 cranks are hollow. Has anyone weighed them to find the weight difference? I'm wondering how much the extra rotating mass will effect hp? We have the cranks, but haven't broken the engines down yet.. We will weigh them soon.. Just wondering if someone has already done it.. Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 03:04 AM
  #2  
blk~2000~Z28's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, OH
Default

By hollow do you mean that there is no hole in the 6.0L crank for oil passages? I mean I find it quite odd, even though I have never seen a 6.0L or an LS1 crank personally, that a crank can be totally solid. Maybe I am wrong and you meant something different when you said solid.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 03:32 AM
  #3  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

I think what he means is that the LS1 cranks are gun-drilled through the main journals (approx 3/4" hole), and the truck cranks aren't, and what weight difference this may be, and is it worth any HP.....
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 03:43 AM
  #4  
blk~2000~Z28's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, OH
Default

OK, I was just checking. That clears alot things up thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #5  
Country Boy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by mbaskett
I think what he means is that the LS1 cranks are gun-drilled through the main journals (approx 3/4" hole), and the truck cranks aren't, and what weight difference this may be, and is it worth any HP.....

Mains and rod journals

For weight, email Valvegod@aol.com
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 12:55 AM
  #6  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Country Boy
Mains and rod journals

For weight, email Valvegod@aol.com
Actually, the 5.7L cranks I've seen are only drilled on the main journals.... unless the inside of the cranks are hollow in the rod journals with no visible external indications of this.... but if this is the case, then are the truck cranks also like this?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 01:40 AM
  #7  
bigeller's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

I weighed a 6.0L crank and an LS1 crank earlier.. The truck crank weighed 52 lbs and the LS1 51 lbs.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 01:52 AM
  #8  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

was that with or without the timing chain sprocket?

I'm still hoping someone will pipe up with any pros/cons to the minor weight difference....
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 02:02 AM
  #9  
bigeller's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

IT was whatever was in your garage on the bottom shelf..
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 02:04 AM
  #10  
bigeller's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

The other LS1 Funky and I tore down also had a 51 lb. crank in it.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 05:21 PM
  #11  
95LS1TA's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Skiatook, OK
Default

I thought they where the same??
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 06:10 PM
  #12  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 95LS1TA
I thought they where the same??
nope... I'll try and snap a pic of them side by side tonight....
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #13  
Country Boy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by mbaskett
nope... I'll try and snap a pic of them side by side tonight....
This will be interesting....

I thought the mains were hollow also


In theory, the 6.0 would be stronger as it is completely solid as opposed to having hollow journals.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 04:06 AM
  #14  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

no pic tonight, batteries were dead in the camera ... they're in the charger, so I WILL have a pic for ya'll hopefully mid-day tommorrow...
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 12:34 PM
  #15  
95LS1TA's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Skiatook, OK
Default

So they have the same stroke, journals etc., they are just made a little different like more material here and there. So they are interchangable with any ls1 type motor, Right
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 12:43 PM
  #16  
bigeller's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 01:29 PM
  #17  
Country Boy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by bigeller
Good find! Proves they are the same.

Now someone buy my new 6.0 crank
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 02:01 PM
  #18  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 95LS1TA
So they have the same stroke, journals etc., they are just made a little different like more material here and there. So they are interchangable with any ls1 type motor, Right
there were some differences in the rear hub on the pre 2000 (or was it 2001) truck cranks that makes them not interchangeable because the flexplat/flywheel will be off.... but other than that, you're correct...

Going to take pics now....
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #19  
mbaskett's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 5
From: Flower Mound, TX
Default

Okay, here's a pic as promised

The 6.0L crank in on the left. Interesting thing is that they both have the same GM part number cast on them (visible in the pic) of 12552216
Attached Thumbnails Crank weights 6.0 vs LS1-crank_comp.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 04:13 PM
  #20  
Country Boy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Cool! I thought the 5.7s were drilled in the rods, I was wrong Thanks for the pic!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.