What spring are they using?
That's also what we ran in the IRL a few years ago.
I heard that when some IRL engine folks went "outside" for cam lobe design they found some significantly better valve dynamics and some power. This was a few years ago also. Does that jibe with your experience?
I heard that when some IRL engine folks went "outside" for cam lobe design they found some significantly better valve dynamics and some power. This was a few years ago also. Does that jibe with your experience?
The GM cam designs never cam within 20hp of my designs.
as for Vizard, David's a nice guy, but he's english.
Last edited by CamKing; Jun 28, 2006 at 10:34 AM.
The GM cam designs never cam within 20hp of my designs.
as for Vizard, David's a nice guy, but he's english.

Well, actually is wasn't from you that I heard about the IRL cams. I don't know who you are, but I'm pretty sure that you aren't the guy I heard it from face to face. Perhaps they tried a few "outsiders". Just how sophisticated is your lobe design software? Commercial or proprietary?
As for Vizard, what's being a Brit have to do with anything? There are a few fair-to-middlin' Brits doing engines. I will say that DV writes for an audience that isn't in the top few % of engine folks, but that's where the writing money is. He does know more that he puts in most of his writing which you probably noticed in your one-on-one with him.
So back to my original question to you: Why is .030 to coil bind "common in NASCAR nowdays" ?
Bret
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My shop is right down the street from Vizard's house.
I'm making a couple of cams for him right now.
BTW, if you want to know who I am, look in March's issue of Circle Track.
There's a little story in there about balancing camshafts.
I guess you didn't see the little laughing face.
My shop is right down the street from Vizard's house.
I'm making a couple of cams for him right now.
Because the allmighty and powerful Spintron told us so.
BTW, if you want to know who I am, look in March's issue of Circle Track.
There's a little story in there about balancing camshafts.
The basic IRL GM engine came with GM cams. Most all the engine builders replaced them with aftermarket cams.
I guess you didn't see the little laughing face.
My shop is right down the street from Vizard's house.
I'm making a couple of cams for him right now.
There's a little story in there about balancing camshafts.
CamKing, do you make .842 solid flat tappet cams for late model and super late model oval cars?
At one point some teams used the Big *** Beehives on some restrictor engines in Cup but I know at least once the higher rpm these springs spin at since they are single wound springs ate through the retainers and ended several guys days! A normal double spring doesn't turn as fast since both springs are tying to spin different directions and one wins but not by a lot!
CamKing, do you make .842 solid flat tappet cams for late model and super late model oval cars?
CamKing, do you make .842 solid flat tappet cams for late model and super late model oval cars?
The majority of the cams I sell are for Flat Tappet circle track classes.
I'll PM you the info from my website.
You do get great results by running springs very close to solid but you have to have everything set up close so that things dont go into bind and the springs need to have consistent coil bind tolerances


