crank sensor voltage
msd says the problem is with the reluctor on the callies crank.
callies and i quote '' throw that msd in the garbage its the problem''
they say the reluctor is within spec +/- .014.
i have a stock crank here. i think im gonna take it to the machine
shop and get the rod journals turned down so it will fit my rods (grp alum.)
and stick it in there then i will know for sure.
just a reminder i have two other motors here that run fine on this ignition.
both have stock cranks.
i should have it back together by the end of next week.
and i will keep you posted. thanks again , matt
i have a stock crank here. i think im gonna take it to the machine
shop and get the rod journals turned down so it will fit my rods (grp alum.)
and stick it in there then i will know for sure.
well i got the stock crank back from the shop yesturday. put it back together last night, and installed it to day. and............ it started right up and ran fine
NOW WHAT SHOULD I DOgonna call callies in the morning and have anthor talk with brooke.
they had allready sent mine back out to me and said theres nothing wrong with it.he called me back on wensday and said he needed my crank back again.
they think they have found the problem.
the counter weight next to the reluctor on a 4'' crank is really close to the edge of the wheel, and it causes interferece with the msd signal(apparantly only msd) and on a stock crank ,the counter weight is further back from the edge. now there gonna turn down the counter weight and rebalance it .
should have it back in a couple weeks. i will know more then.sure hope this fixes it.
i guess the next step for me is going to be a front mount distributor. kinda sucks because thats one of the reasons
i got away from sbc in the first place
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
i guess the next step for me is going to be a front mount distributor. kinda sucks because thats one of the reasons
i got away from sbc in the first place

this mother@!#$%^ sounds nasty
track times coming soon. prolly 2 or 3 weeks.
thanks again for the help. matt n.









