Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

hp vs cfm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #1  
nitsudls1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default hp vs cfm

I've noticed that the 4.8, 5.3, and the 6.0 all have similar (within reason) hp figures. They have comon intake, and exaust manifolds. This makes sence as the smaller motors make less torque and rev higher to get the hp. Now my real question is:

How fast would I need to spin a 6.0 liter ,with l92 heads, to make a peak 600hp?

Will a simple cfm = hp formula get me a rule of thumb idea?

Just curious
Dot
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #2  
RE AND CHERYL's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
Default

Peak power has nothing to do with RPM and everything to do with CFM of air moved through the engine. To make that kind of power it's obviously going to take good heads, a BIG cam and lots of RPM. It also won't be what I would call a STREET motor for that C-10 of yours. If 600 hp is your goal it might be easier to attain and better to drive with forced induction.

Re'
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 12:42 AM
  #3  
nitsudls1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Kind of what i figured. but i have always liked the sound and pull of a highe winding small block. I feel like a stroked (402) wouldn't produce "mutch" more peak hp, but it would simply move the peak hp to a lower rpm. Mabe im all wet but thats what i've noticed from looking at dyno graphs over the years. The truck weighs a lot so I agree it probly wouldn't be a nice pet.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #4  
RE AND CHERYL's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
Default

Your right. The same size cam in a larger engine will drive the power peek lower, but that's why we run larger cams in larger motors.

Peek horsepower is nice to brag about. But it's the midrange and low end we use to get around on a normal day.

Re'
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
Alvin's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 718
Likes: 1
Default

It is better to look at air mass consumption.

I have found for a gen 3/4 NA engine you will make around 1 hp for every .916 grams per second.

LT1's will make closer to 1 hp for every gram per second.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.