241 243 castings. CFM?
I don't port heads, but I listen to some very successful guys who do. The ones who I know who do extremely successful LS endurance engines pretty much agree with what Cascazilla posted, which seems to disagree with what Schwanke posted.
My own opinion is that you design a cam to work with the rest of the engine, especially the ports, intake manifold, exhaust headers, etc...that stuff that moves the wind, rather than try to make the heads "fit" the cam. This applies to daily drivers, drag only, endurance. sprint or 'bout any engine. Heck, even if you race in a "lift rule" or "duration rule" cam class, this still applies. It just makes the cam guy's job a little more difficult.
FWIW, I am impressed by the numbers quoted above. I don't think everyone with a die grinder can get there. I certainly couldn't.
Jon
i used to think it was all about low-mid lift flow nos...but i have seen in the last couple years that is not really what you want,at least for most applications..i don't understand exactly why,but the guys making the big HP go for flow in the higher lift range..
i used to think it was all about low-mid lift flow nos...but i have seen in the last couple years that is not really what you want,at least for most applications..i don't understand exactly why,but the guys making the big HP go for flow in the higher lift range..
Jon
Jon
If I knew any of the details I wouldn't compromise my sources. I encourage folks to keep thinking about what happens in an engine and not parrot what they have read from internet "experts". Everything in the operating engine is interconnected which often makes it difficult to understand the "why".
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/832264-flow-bench-results-inside-ported-ls1-vs-ported-5-3-vs-ported-ls6.html
If I knew any of the details I wouldn't compromise my sources. I encourage folks to keep thinking about what happens in an engine and not parrot what they have read from internet "experts". Everything in the operating engine is interconnected which often makes it difficult to understand the "why".
i used to parrot what some "experts" have said,and i've learned a lot from modding my cars,and had to change some of my "theories" about how an engine works over the past few yrs..i've also learned i how much i don't know as well,lol..
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As for numbers.... what do they mean anyways? Flow benches seem to lie worse than hookers do about the size of a guys member.
As for numbers.... what do they mean anyways? Flow benches seem to lie worse than hookers do about the size of a guys member.
Wow and infinte wisdom coming out of your pie hole here.... sounds like you can regurgitate what every other moron on the boards "thinks" is good. I highly doubt YOU have ever touched a ET or All Pro head let alone ran one on the dyno against something else or even come close to making 1000hp in a LS2 block.
Oh yeah you READ about it on a internet forum. I forgot

Thank god I'm actually screwing someone who knows something. Knowledge thru injecton!
Jess
I'm guessing "someone" has "lied" to you before, poor boys. Someone = Hooker
As for the average flow versus peak flow, on LS6 headed small displacement engines with .590 lift the engines really only respond to increses in flow over .400 lift, and especially .500-.600 for the largest increase in power. Having lots of low lift hurts power substantially on the bottom end and has a small benefit of helping to carry power a little better after peak. Average power suffers when you use "Internet Logic" to port heads.
Most of the time, on an LS6 head, if you do something to increase the .500-.600 flow it will hurt the low numbers if you are doing it with the valve job.
Making peak flow just before peak velocity sounds like it makes sense. I used to actually think that too. It is easy to believe because it's logical in a basic sense. In reality, it absolutely won't work and can't be made to happen anyways.







