gurus, need a quick word on quench height
thanks alot
mg
I did it this way because the bottom end was already together (pistons pressed on) and balanced. It turned out great.
Do what evers cheaper. New pistons or have it decked, but get the quench right.
Last edited by redbandit98; Jun 15, 2008 at 09:56 PM.
So your quench is too big, you could run it, but I guarantee it'll detonate way worse than one with tight quench. So you can back off timing and lose power that way or use 93 octane and lose money. Octane isn't even the answer because big quench makes an engine run inefficient.
Your piston quench area to cylinder head needs to be .035 to .045, the tighter the better. It's up to you to get it there.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
link to pistons
http://kb-silvolite.com/performance...etails&P_id=157
link to cam
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Dy...6HR-10_001.asp
http://books.google.com/books?id=GUC...esult#PPA48,M1
page 48
http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ar/eb80224.htm
Last edited by 1 FMF; Jun 18, 2008 at 12:05 PM.
-KB120040 (.040 over KB120) piston put you .024 in the hole.
-I didn't see any .028" gaskets on summit for a 4.040" bore, but I did find a .016" x 4.1" which would get you right at .040" quench (FEL-7733SH1 $13 each).
With the 64cc heads, you're looking at about 10.2:1 by my calculations. (810.66cc/79.5cc)
while i got you guys attention, assuming i can find a ~.030 head gasket, my static cr would be ~9.9.1. Im assuming there is no way in hell i can run this compression with iron vortec heads? im guessing Ill have to switch to aluminum?
Last edited by redbandit98; Jun 25, 2008 at 07:33 PM.





