Ground effects... yeah or ney?
As general, I always see them on unlowered cars and that to me makes them a half-assed substatute for lowering. <img border="0" alt="[punch]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_punch.gif" />
Don't get me wrong, if a car is lowered AND has them they can look really cool, <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> but this is really had to do (ground clearance).
I have seen some that I would like to have but to me they are just too much of a problem. Because my car is lowered, I am sure that I would never get into parking lots and over speed bumps. The first time I tried to get into my driveway I would just rip the front one clean off. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
Seriously, either way is cool but I prefer ALL 4th gen Camaro's without them.
Mike
<strong> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> http://www.thunderms.com/members/gev/index.asp?ID=1 </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Specs:
HP: 400
E.T.: 13.15 @ 106
What are you on that you have 400 hp and still can't get into the 12s
<strong>
What are you on that you have 400 hp and still can't get into the 12s </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Notice the lack of suspension mods,
Not being able to get traction sucks!!
<img border="0" alt="[bang head]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_banghead.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[bang head]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_banghead.gif" />
Nice Car!!


