Locking converter at wot
A torque converter wet clutch can not perform the same task as a manual
Dry clutch though people are asking it to do so.

The torque holding load of the wet single or multi plate clutch can not match the dry clutch single or multi plate that are used behind the LS based engines.
They will hold for a short time but will fail as to the extreme heat that they must absorb under load at WOT lock up.
Multi plate designs have thin plates that will warp and cause surface hot spots with time, this warpage and spotting of the plates will cause clutch drag in the converter and lead to the demise of the unit (they hold fine after lock up as no heat is generated) but so will a single plate clutch at this point
A torque converter wet clutch can not perform the same task as a manual
Dry clutch though people are asking it to do so.

The torque holding load of the wet single or multi plate clutch can not match the dry clutch single or multi plate that are used behind the LS based engines.
They will hold for a short time but will fail as to the extreme heat that they must absorb under load at WOT lock up.
Multi plate designs have thin plates that will warp and cause surface hot spots with time, this warpage and spotting of the plates will cause clutch drag in the converter and lead to the demise of the unit (they hold fine after lock up as no heat is generated) but so will a single plate clutch at this point
I know whoever I spoke to on the phone at Yank told me their converter only has about a 5% loss compared to about 15-20% with others like TCI. I am not sure what the Circle d is as far as efficiency is concerned though.
Last edited by Stephen Griner; Mar 26, 2009 at 03:39 PM.
Single disk converter have there place, but so do Multi disk.
Chris
I know whoever I spoke to on the phone at Yank told me their converter only has about a 5% loss compared to about 15-20% with others like TCI. I am not sure what the Circle d is as far as efficiency is concerned though.
Chris
I just got a 700r4 from a friend who had a Monster Stage 2 700r4 to put in my 73 Camaro behind my 383.
I am very new to overdrive autos so I don't know a damn thing about them.
When would locking the converter be useful? When or when not to do so.
The car will be at the drag strip about 50% of its life wo I want good performance but I don't want to wreck the tranny either.
So if anyone could school me on these things I would really appreciate it.
I know whoever I spoke to on the phone at Yank told me their converter only has about a 5% loss compared to about 15-20% with others like TCI. I am not sure what the Circle d is as far as efficiency is concerned though.
If the correct converter is installed for the setup there is no need to lock it.
Look at the top drag cars running converters and they are not of lock up design NHRA stockers are a good example of this.
If you are lossing 5-6 MPH you have the incorrect converter!
I have drag raced around 40 years and started testing lock ups in the mid 80's and to this day have not found any correctly set up N/A cars that have lowered ET by lock up.
The small MPH if any is not worth the effort and possible failures.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
A torque converter wet clutch can not perform the same task as a manual
Dry clutch though people are asking it to do so.

The torque holding load of the wet single or multi plate clutch can not match the dry clutch single or multi plate that are used behind the LS based engines.
They will hold for a short time but will fail as to the extreme heat that they must absorb under load at WOT lock up.
Multi plate designs have thin plates that will warp and cause surface hot spots with time, this warpage and spotting of the plates will cause clutch drag in the converter and lead to the demise of the unit (they hold fine after lock up as no heat is generated) but so will a single plate clutch at this point
You guys must not be in the cummins specific diesel market.....
converter locked through WOT shifts, holding 1000++ ft lbs
I'd put the To. holding capacity of my Goerend 3disk up against about any dry clutch
Hyd.>>> spring pressure
I have no doubt a well built CircleD or any well designed multi plate converter would hold whatever you wanted locked behind a LS based engine...... as long tranny has a good lockup circuit
Look at the top drag cars running converters and they are not of lock up design NHRA stockers are a good example of this.
If you are lossing 5-6 MPH you have the incorrect converter!
I have drag raced around 40 years and started testing lock ups in the mid 80's and to this day have not found any correctly set up N/A cars that have lowered ET by lock up.
The small MPH if any is not worth the effort and possible failures.
Chris
converter locked through WOT shifts, holding 1000++ ft lbs
I'd put the To. holding capacity of my Goerend 3disk up against about any dry clutch
Hyd.>>> spring pressure
I have no doubt a well built CircleD or any well designed multi plate converter would hold whatever you wanted locked behind a LS based engine...... as long tranny has a good lockup circuit
Chris
circle d, are there advantages in et to be had by locking the converter in a big nitrous set up? or are you against that?
Yank built its first Multi plate Billet Diesel converter 1990 so your not telling us anything new here as to converter design and fuction.
We just like non Diesel race and street cars better so we took that direction for the company.
I dont see any reason why a multi disc would not hold. Looking at the clutch area of even the billet single disc and then adding a few of them would far exceed most any clutch set in the transmission in friction area, Certainly the 3-4 set but even the forward set would be left looking small in comparison. And they hold the full force of the car every day. Yank built its first Multi plate Billet Diesel converter 1990 so your not telling us anything new here as to converter design and fuction.
We just like non Diesel race and street cars better so we took that direction for the company.
I am not saying you guys don't know what you are talking about..... I know you build one of the top converters out there, as I have one
And the converter for a 47rh/re is hardly huge.... no bigger than a 4l80 converter
Anyway, All i am trying to say is that if a larger multi disk converter can handle WOT lockup on a much larger vehicle with a ton more TO........ then a smaller multidisk converter (of equal quality) should have no issues with a much lighter vehicle and less TO
Just giving my 2 cents
Many times NA cars ET better with a big sloppy unlocked stall then a lockup, even if they do lose a mph or two up top.
If you are losing 6mph then you have the wrong stall for your combo, the tranny is going, the stall is slipping, or a mix of all three.
Save the trap speed racing for crotch rockets and turbo'd manuals.









