Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

To TH350 or not

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 09:45 PM
  #21  
bspz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by kp
FWIW, I weighed my t56/stock flywheel/spec III clutch/bellhousing/crossmember against the the lockup TH350 with cast deep pan/TP4200 converter/flexplate/adapter plate/Yank crossmember with torque arm mount and the TH350 stuff was 15lbs less..
thanks for that info .. looks like when I have the extra cash a TH 350 will be going in
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #22  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 45,306
Likes: 1,743
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Everyone told me that T350's are not as strong as T400's, and that the beefing up of the T350 will bring it to T400 cost levels.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 06:55 AM
  #23  
bspz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Everyone told me that T350's are not as strong as T400's, and that the beefing up of the T350 will bring it to T400 cost levels.
well that may be true but is the th350 like 40 pounds lighter then the th400??
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #24  
Camaroholic's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 1
From: Waco, TX
Default

I'm (quietly) considering this same swap (going with a built 350). I was curious too... A quick search on the internet shows this:

TH 350...126#s
TH 400...139#s
All these transmissions were weighted dry, on the same day, with no convertors AND on my "official" bathroom scale.
(end paste)

Hmm, is the 13# savings worth the extra cost? Hmm... I dunno, I'll still probably go the TH350 / Ultrabell / TH400 drum & sprag route...
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #25  
kp's Avatar
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

its generally accepted the TH400 is 15lbs heavier the the 350 - but 95% of that is rotating weight. The ultrabell is pretty heavy and an ultrabell + TH350 will probably be heavier then a stock TH400.

It takes a few parts to make the TH350 not blow up, but most can get away with just the intermediate race/sprag upgrade. The new sprag/drum/race from TCI is 350.00 so that plus the 2.75 1st gear and things start getting expensive. After a year of hard use the TH350 will need to be taken apart and looked at most likely - they start to fail in a pretty linear fashion so its pretty obvious when its 'that time.' Plus there are hundreds of local guys just about everywhere that will rebuild them or build you a nice one for reasonable cost - same with a TH400. I'm stingy with my HP though and I want to get as much to the wheels as I can

Over 500rwhp or a nitrous/turbo car I would probbaly go with a TH400 or if I wanted to run a brake for bracket racing.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #26  
silverTA's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

i got TH350 with 4000 stall nonlockup with TH400 sprag/drum (4000 to 6000 miles street driven and racing it every friday nights never had a proplem yet ,,i think its the best combo
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #27  
BigBake's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Viginia Beach, VA
Default

Whats wrong with the Yank Pro Sportsman 4L60E with transbrake? Looks to be a stout transmission designed for up too 700ft lbs of torque.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #28  
silverTA's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

Originally Posted by BigBake
Whats wrong with the Yank Pro Sportsman 4L60E with transbrake? Looks to be a stout transmission designed for up too 700ft lbs of torque.

i broke mine with 300 miles on it at street racing and lost 700$
don't have the transbrake

if u want a build 4l60e go with FLP a friend go one and no proplem yet
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #29  
69firebird's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: hurst tx
Default

how is the highway driving with a 3spd tranny? what kind of rear gear are you guys running with this?

I am about to get a conversion from a local guy but he said he hated it on the freeway, he has a 3.73 rear gear, and said the tranny was at like6k when going 65 on teh freeway

just wondering
thanks
ed
firebird455@onebox.com
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 06:34 AM
  #30  
JoSeY's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
From: Your Reality Check Bounced...
Default

yeah a 3 spd def. needs a 323 or 315 gear if u plan on driving it. if u plan on RACING the car deal w/the 373 gears, and just drive slower...hell I did it and it took me a lot longer to get to the race spots...but my motor and tranny held...
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #31  
Coach 02 A3 Z/28's Avatar
"The Drag Racing Director"
20 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,538
Likes: 4
From: Tomball, TX.
Thumbs up

My turbo 350 is great now.

After the 2 times I broke the 2 gear sprag. At the Super 10's(HRP) and the Thunder Shootout. 2 weekends in a row.

I went from a M6 to a Turbo 350 for bracket racing. I have a 4800 stall converter and she is holding up pretty well now.

If I had to do it over again I would put a power glide in her!

Good luck to ya.

Coach
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:20 AM
  #32  
kp's Avatar
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

With 3.42s and 27" tall tires its not that bad on the highway, I think 55-60 will be max cruising speed with the 3.70s though. 3000rpm doesnt sound bad on my stock motor and th blower makes almost no noise there. When I had heads/cam with a noisy valvetrain I dont know if I could have taken the 2500rpm cruise rpm for long - mine sounded like it was going to explode at 2500.

I also expect oil consumption to go up quite a bit (if GM is right on the ring flutter thing) keeping the egine up that high all the time but thats how it goes..
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 01:41 AM
  #33  
z ya's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: stockton,ca
Default

What kind of rwhp loss between the TH400 and TH350??? I have a TH400 that I was going to run but if I will be lossing a bunch of hp compared to the TH350 then I may just sell it.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #34  
DERTY's Avatar
The Bull
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

A few things to consider. If you are worried about the weight of the rotating parts, get an aluminum drum. If you drive it on the street, have the aluminum drum hubbed with a steel liner. Rossler Transmissions did this for me. That will bring your rotating mass down substantially, for a cost.

A TH350 or TH400 will certainly hammer your perceived HP measurements on a dyno. If you are interested in running a dyno queen, stick with a six speed. If you are interested in picking up some nice ET and a couple MPH the TH400 with a proper torque converter will beat the M6 hands down. I was shocked when I did the conversion at how much the car picked up.

You can also get different 1st gear ratios. If you are concerned about the high initial 1st gear you can actually get a lower gear to help you roll out nicer. I have not done this with my transmission, but I'm debating it!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 02:32 PM
  #35  
1fstTA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: shreveport, Louisiana
Default

hey derty im very impressed with your times man your car is flying. If you dont mind I was just curious as to what your dyno numbers look like with th th400 and you weight when you ran the 9.5 and how much spray and what convertor. thanks in advance
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #36  
DERTY's Avatar
The Bull
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

Replied to your other post.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.