Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4L80e vs. 4L60e

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2015 | 05:40 PM
  #1  
Mike Cordero's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (123)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 5
Default 4L80e vs. 4L60e

All around size, weight, etc?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2015 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
Jake's Performance's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 24
Default

Approx the same length. 4L80E is 30-35 lbs heavier. Slightly bulkier external dimensions.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2015 | 09:20 PM
  #3  
2nd Gen Fl 'bird's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 1
From: On the coast of somewhere
Default

C'mon Jake's. You need to explain as well on "how Much power" it consumes before it starts.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2015 | 09:54 PM
  #4  
Jake's Performance's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by 2nd Gen Fl 'bird
C'mon Jake's. You need to explain as well on "how Much power" it consumes before it starts.
I didn't see that question in the original post and since there is very little difference in the power "consumed" between the two, I'm not sure why it's worth mentioning.

This topic gets brought up occasionally and in decades past it was the TH350 vs. TH400 argument, and these days it's the 4L60E vs 4L80E argument.

It's the same now as it was 2 decades ago when I started dealing with these things. It's a big discussion that has no relevance for most of the enthusiasts who seem to want to beat it to death.
If you make enough power to need a 4L80E, you are beyond the capabilities of the 4L60E anyway. The other aspect is that a dual purpose street strip car isn't likely to set any class records, so worrying about 5-15 HP in the transmission is a waste of effort. If it's a dedicated track car that is competing for records, it doesn't need a 4L80E or 4L60E, it would have a TH400 with alloy drums, or a Powerglide with not a single OEM GM part left in it, or a ProFlite, or a Lenco.

I've had cars go faster with a TH400 than a TH350, all else being equal. I've also gone from a TH400 to a 4L80E in a pretty serious street/strip car and not lost any ET/MPH (actually went faster).
Unless you are running mid 9's or faster, it's a waste of time to worry about all the "HP consumed" myths.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2015 | 11:50 AM
  #5  
2nd Gen Fl 'bird's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 779
Likes: 1
From: On the coast of somewhere
Default

Just being a smart ***. The myths were more of the butt of the joke. Yes, it has been beaten to death.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2015 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
Mike Cordero's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (123)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Jake's Performance
I didn't see that question in the original post and since there is very little difference in the power "consumed" between the two, I'm not sure why it's worth mentioning.

This topic gets brought up occasionally and in decades past it was the TH350 vs. TH400 argument, and these days it's the 4L60E vs 4L80E argument.

It's the same now as it was 2 decades ago when I started dealing with these things. It's a big discussion that has no relevance for most of the enthusiasts who seem to want to beat it to death.
If you make enough power to need a 4L80E, you are beyond the capabilities of the 4L60E anyway. The other aspect is that a dual purpose street strip car isn't likely to set any class records, so worrying about 5-15 HP in the transmission is a waste of effort. If it's a dedicated track car that is competing for records, it doesn't need a 4L80E or 4L60E, it would have a TH400 with alloy drums, or a Powerglide with not a single OEM GM part left in it, or a ProFlite, or a Lenco.

I've had cars go faster with a TH400 than a TH350, all else being equal. I've also gone from a TH400 to a 4L80E in a pretty serious street/strip car and not lost any ET/MPH (actually went faster).
Unless you are running mid 9's or faster, it's a waste of time to worry about all the "HP consumed" myths.
The trans will be used in a 1954 Chevy truck project. I will hav a 408 twin turbo on it but honestly, will be a time ti time show truck, with A/c but if I have some power from this engine, should I buy the 4l80e or the 4l60e would be enough; the truck won't be use as a race truck. Thinking about money spent and the real need.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2015 | 07:41 PM
  #7  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,322
Likes: 528
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

IMHO "twin turbo" and 4L60E should not be used in the same sentence.
Yes, a very well built (Level-7) 4L60E will perhaps handle that power, but it will cost $4000+ for all the aftermarket and billet parts; they are also tricky to build.
In contrast a modestly built (Level-2) 4L80E can easily handle the power and will cost much less.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.