BHP affect on stall rpm?
The more hp/lb ft and engine makes the higher a torque converter will stall right?
Well what affect would there be on something like a 3600rpm stall if the car gains say an extra 100bhp?
Example:
Full bolt on LS1 making somewhere around 340-350rwhp. The stall was setup for this level of performance, and is rated at and stalls to 3600rpm.
Now the car under goes a h/c and know makes 440+rwhp and 410rwtq. How much higher would the same torque conveter stall too?
The stall inquestion would be a Fuddle SS or similar.
Be weary of rated stall speeds, as some converter companies do not have the appropriate means of verifying the specs of converters. Some companies will base there specs on other "known" converters or what converter cores have shown to result in the past. To truely test a converter you need a converter dynomometer that can properly output the torque needed to verify the specs on the intended application.
Here's my dilema. I'm perfectly happy with a 3600rpm stall on a bolt on vehicle, I guess ~350rwtq.
But the car is not primerlily for dragging, more British B road bashing so I don't want too loose a converter. Also fuel prices suck over here so again I don't want anything too wild converter wise.
Now if by adding h/c (thinking along the lines of MS4 and PRC strage 1 heads) I think thru an auto ~440rwhp might be possible combined with all the other bolt ons (LTs, pulley, FAST 90/90, etc.) I've seen a similar setup on a manual making 480rwhp & 430rwtq.
But I don't really want to end up with my 3600rpm stall becoming a 4000 or 4400rpm stall due to the cam change. I'd prefer to keep it around 3600-3800rpm.
The converter build design as to hydrodynamics will also be needed for this quess
I don't actually have the converter yet, so I might wait until I have the h/c done also. It's too much of pain shipping across the pond to end up getting it wrong.
thanks for your help.




