Wikipedia biased?
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 1
From: HOU - yeah, you know the rest.
I happen to be on Wikipedia a few days ago and looked up Nurburgring lap times. I noticed the ZR1 time of 7:22.4 as run by Jan Magnussen in Oct. 08 is not posted. I searched further into the matter and found out some squirrel is disputing the fact! It has been published in several magazines and is noted on numerous websites. What is there to dispute? This is a fact and needs to be placed on the list. Wkikpedia is supposed to be an informational and factual site where people can add to a base of knowledge. I would love to have a bunch a people from this site bombard Wikipedia about this exclusion.
Yes it is somewhat... and since anyone can edit it, it isn't really the best source for accurate info at times where personal opinion comes into play. A while ago some ford fan was meddling with the GM LS engine part, sticking stuff in there how it was so inferior to the ford modular.
Yes it is somewhat... and since anyone can edit it, it isn't really the best source for accurate info at times where personal opinion comes into play. A while ago some ford fan was meddling with the GM LS engine part, sticking stuff in there how it was so inferior to the ford modular.
I happen to be on Wikipedia a few days ago and looked up Nurburgring lap times. I noticed the ZR1 time of 7:22.4 as run by Jan Magnussen in Oct. 08 is not posted. I searched further into the matter and found out some squirrel is disputing the fact! It has been published in several magazines and is noted on numerous websites. What is there to dispute? This is a fact and needs to be placed on the list. Wkikpedia is supposed to be an informational and factual site where people can add to a base of knowledge. I would love to have a bunch a people from this site bombard Wikipedia about this exclusion.





