Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What's the value of a 69 LS1 / T56 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2017, 01:31 PM
  #21  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Pop N Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

But the important take away from this whole conversation is there is a lot of disagreement about what a hot rod is worth, a fact insurance companies will use to their advantage should you ever actually make a claim.

Classic car insurance, agreed or stated value, is a poor investment.
Old 05-16-2017, 10:44 PM
  #22  
scj
TECH Addict
iTrader: (89)
 
scj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pop N Wood

Classic car insurance, agreed or stated value, is a poor investment.
umm, id rather have some good kind of insurance to protect what i own than get $3500 for a wrecked car i've got $35,000 in. even if it takes an argument, insurance on a classic car, agreed or stated value is a must.

from a cost stand point, this kind of insurance really doesn't cost any more than full coverage insurance on an equally valued car you would daily drive.
Old 05-17-2017, 05:25 AM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Pop N Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scj
from a cost stand point, this kind of insurance really doesn't cost any more than full coverage insurance on an equally valued car you would daily drive.
It is still throwing money away if you never collect on it.

Unfortunately I've had too many bad experiences with insurance companies to naively think they have my best interest in mind or will act with any kind of honor. If they can find an out they will take it.

Read through this thread. A bunch of car guys can't come close to agreeing what a car is worth. Throw in a bunch of insurance guys/lawyers/judges and do you honestly think the picture gets any clearer?

Take the money you save and buy stocks. You will be dollars ahead. Pretty easy math.
Old 05-17-2017, 05:35 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
chuckd71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nashville / Tampa
Posts: 1,760
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 91FormulaKiller
13 year thread resurrection. Now we know an LS swapped 1st gen with upgraded suspension amongst other things is worth a F-load of money.
Too bad they generally cost 2xF to build. I'm sure some people make money from these things, but the only ones I can recall seeing outside of some barret-jackson nonsense are people placing no value on labor / time and those pretending inflation isn't real. Personally I'd put "investing" in these cars about on par with investing in freshly baked apple pies or squirrel collar manufacturing; in other words depending on it for for less than zero percent of my assets. Car related debits and credits stay out of real life accounting.

Regardless, people here (and p-t, lat g, etc) are going to disagree with the chevelles.com, team camaro, etc guys, and that's fine, but it sucks when the insurance company says my car is worth $5k when I have 10 times that in it. Hard to get a decent agreed value when the guy coming to appraise is either generally dealing with 86 accords or stock-ish classics. Can't somebody come up with a flat rate term life sort of insurance for cars?
Old 05-17-2017, 06:41 AM
  #25  
Sex On Wheels
iTrader: (19)
 
will69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,548
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

My insurance so far has been great to deal with. Honor a certified appraisers value assigned as long as they vet them first. As for wasting money on insurance I'm sure mine is cheaper than most. And stipulations on driving are minimal.

I don't look at my car as an investment and think most probably don't. Can't you make money building them? Sure but the money to be made is in the labor part of the build and how much is your time worth.

I wouldn't get my cash out of the car but don't plan to ever sell so not worried about that :-)
Old 05-17-2017, 07:05 AM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

The whole point of stated value insurance is that you and the insurance company agree up front on the "value" of the car. However, you can't buy that kind of insurance for a car that's your daily driver -- there are restrictions on how the car can be used. Almost all the problems occur when folks (usually younger, less experience) dump a TON of money into their daily, have it covered with traditional insurance, never inform the insurance company about the changes to the car/have it professionally appraised -- and then expect to recoup all of their "investment" when the car gets totaled. Or, the damage is caused by an incident that's expressly prohibited in the policy ("contest of speed"), and they expect they will be covered. Fact is, hardly anyone actually reads their insurance policy where each party's commitments are set forth.

On the other hand, you have 69 Camaros like this -- where the owner likely spent $1/2 million building it. https://ringbrothers.com/1969_camaro_razor It might sell a year later at Barrett-Jackson for $300k -- to which someone will claim 'yeah, but there's a $300,000 69 Camaro with LS power'. But the owner took a beating on it.
Old 05-17-2017, 07:58 AM
  #27  
Sex On Wheels
iTrader: (19)
 
will69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,548
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I agree with that. Mine is insured for about what I have into it minus labor.

I read all the terms and some aren't great but my concerns were covered with total loss compensation. I would get 75% of m my investment (as mentioned above, minus labor) and I'm pretty happy with that.

Plus I pay 900/yr and have minimal restrictions on use aside from can't be my daily or considered the backup transportation. Etc. but with 6,000/yr mileage, that leaves some room for enjoyment.
Old 05-17-2017, 08:10 AM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

If you don't mind answering -- who is your coverage with and what amount? The annual payment is quite a bit more than my Hagerty coverage --- guessing you have more coverage. Similarly - mine can't be daily or back up. No specific mileage limitation. Lots of pictures required, required to be garaged/locked up when not in use.
Old 05-17-2017, 08:21 AM
  #29  
Sex On Wheels
iTrader: (19)
 
will69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,548
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Same requirements. Coverage is 125k currently. Plans to up to 150k once appraisal is finished. With Rally (guy's that insure most Ariel atoms).
Old 05-17-2017, 08:22 AM
  #30  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Yup - that 'splains it.
Old 05-17-2017, 08:29 AM
  #31  
Sex On Wheels
iTrader: (19)
 
will69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,548
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

My hagerty quote was nearly $3k and Grundy was just over $2k. With less miles allowed and few more restrictions it seemed. Rally made it easy on me. And came recommended by a few friends.

Good insurance is something you hope you never have to use.
Old 05-17-2017, 08:30 AM
  #32  
Sex On Wheels
iTrader: (19)
 
will69camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,548
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I like looking back at this thread and seeing Tony say he had about $20k in parts to put in. I think he overshot that by 4-5x at least.
Old 05-17-2017, 09:11 AM
  #33  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Yup - hope/act for the best; plan for the worst.
Old 05-17-2017, 10:31 AM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1964SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,527
Received 82 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pop N Wood

Classic car insurance, agreed or stated value, is a poor investment.
I completely disagree with this statement. Agreed value is by far the best way to protect your investment. If you have an agreed value in the contract you will get your value without any arguments about comparison values. Besides it's barely any more cost then any normal daily driver insurance. My classic car insurance is under $250 for the year and has an agreed value set in place.
Old 05-17-2017, 11:06 AM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

In a sense, PopnWood is right - no one should view insurance as an investment. It's a hedge against a potential loss. Each person decides if they want to hedge or not. The determination of whether it's a good VALUE or not is a subjective one....the decision someone else makes doesn't matter.

Last edited by Michael Yount; 05-17-2017 at 11:53 AM.
Old 05-17-2017, 01:38 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1964SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,527
Received 82 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Michael Yount
In a sense, PopnWood is right - no one should view insurance as an investment. It's a hedge against a potential loss. Each person decides if they want to hedge or not. The determination of whether it's a good VALUE or not is a subjective one....the decision someone else makes doesn't matter.
Very true - it's not an investment at all. It simply protects your investment.
Old 05-17-2017, 02:02 PM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

just be sure there's no "stated value" terms mixed in with the "agreed value" policy. hagerty tried that crap with me. also ridiculous restrictions on use...like I cant either truck as my daily if my main daily is down for repair. eff that.

i went with safeco. they do all three of my cars for like $135/mo. agreed value is ~5k on all three. not enough to break even, but I'll have a good start on building something else. maxed PIP and uninsured/underinsured motorist. wife is covered too even though she doesnt drive---in case someone runs her over on her bicycle. roadside towing for 100miles *crosses fingers knocks on wood*

my *** is in the breeze if any of them get wrecked at the track tho. just part it out and start over :/
Old 05-17-2017, 02:54 PM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Pop N Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1964SS
I completely disagree with this statement. Agreed value is by far the best way to protect your investment. If you have an agreed value in the contract you will get your value without any arguments about comparison values. Besides it's barely any more cost then any normal daily driver insurance. My classic car insurance is under $250 for the year and has an agreed value set in place.
Try and collect than get back to us.

Seems like people who are most happy with their insurance companies have never done anything but mail them checks. Try getting them to mail you one.

Even if the company is honest and lives up to their agreement, car insurance is still a poor investment. It is an odds game. Insurance companies know this. They have the data, know how to do the math and that is how they know they are going to make money. No different than betting black at the casino.

In all honesty if it were legal I wouldn't carry insurance on my daily, but admittedly that is me and fits my situation. It is too hard to say what something is worth, too easy to pass blame, too easy to delay things in court and insurance people are too money focused. What you put into it means nothing. The high end collector car prices goes through cycles no different than the stock market or real estate market. Most of those guys are investor speculating on rising prices in good times. Just because a specific model of car was selling for $100k last year doesn't mean they won't go for half of that a year later. None of that works in our favor.

****, at one point my wife was convinced her beanie baby collection was going to put our kids through college. Luckily the money I saved on car insurance and diverted to a 529 plan did.

Anybody want to buy a couple of trash bags of beanie babies?
Old 05-17-2017, 03:09 PM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

haha beanie babies.
Old 05-17-2017, 03:14 PM
  #40  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by doublejack
A 69 Camaro with an LS1 isn't worth a whole lot. The value would be about on-par to an equivalent condition car with a 'less desirable' engine. The LS1 would obviously be worth a little more than say a vanilla carbed 350, but maybe just by a couple grand.

The only reason why you see some Z28s and SS Camaros selling for big $$$ is because they are documented cars with #'s matching motors. In other words, originality is they key to their high value. Collectors with deep pockets are the cause of those 'inflated' prices. Those aren't being purchased by the average Joe to drive on cruise night. On the flipside, collectors would have nothing to do with an LS1 69 Camaro so without that demand the value will suffer. Average Joe is the guy that would buy such a Camaro, and he's not made of money.

You can't look at your car and what it cost you to customize, add in labor costs and figure that's the value. It just doesn't work that way.

Think about it like this: Take a $500 beater early-90s Ford Escort and spend $2,000 for a nice paint job. Will that make the value $2,500 or more? No. It'll look pretty nice and I'm sure it would be worth more than the original $500 and be easier to sell... but the paint job isn't going to make that big a difference.

Hot Rods are horrible investments. Unless your name is Boyd Coddington you're going lose money in the deal. Check out Hemmings and you'll see page after page of people who put 20K into a car restoring and customizing it and are hoping to get 10k in return. Hot Rodding is a labor of love.

So what would the value be? Whatever you have invested in the car dollar wise, figure it's worth less than that unless you got some killer deals on parts. For the typical restore job, I'd say the value range is anywhere from half to 80% of what was spent. Sad but true.
Half to 80%...? I'd stick with half. You lose money building cars. Plain and simple. UNless your a pro custom car builder. Guys like us doing things in the garage are throwing money right out the window everytime they spend money on a car. We do it because it's what WE want. If you don't realize that now you will when you're done and try to sell it.

I'd say a pretty nice one would go for 20K-ish


Quick Reply: What's the value of a 69 LS1 / T56 Camaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.