Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

'67 Impala. Factory right-hand drive. 6.0L swap.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2016, 04:23 AM
  #21  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Engine in. Motor mounts & adapters. Accessory drive.

Engine and transmission are in.





Pretty straight forward. Used Ken's (kwhizz) adapter plates, with Energy Suspension mounts. Slipped in with little hassle.




Also plenty of clearance under the Holley oil pan:




Had to move the trans crossmember rearward, which was easy enough. Simply chopped off the old mounts, and fab some new ones.







For the front accessory drives, I went with the Holley kit. Got the alternator/steering pump bracket and pulleys installed. Car is not an AC car (yet).





More to come ...
Old 10-18-2016, 10:12 PM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Tanks Inc EFI pump install

Finally made a decision on fuel delivery. I'd considered running an external pump as the simpler option, but after considering the costs of all the extra AN fittings from pre filter, to pump, to post filter - then I still had to modify the tank for a return line.

I looked at the cost of the Tank Inc PA-4 in-tank system, and considering I had to remove the old tank to do a repair, it became the wiser choice.




Got it installed yesterday with no issues.

Removed the old paint from the tank so I could get it repaired.




There was a slight weeping leak from the base of the filler neck, so I had that soldered, and the tank dipped to clean the inside.




I then hit it with some Eastwood Tank Tone. The stuff looks good. Also did the tank straps.






I chose the front left corner. Deepest part of the pan, with the biggest flat spot. Required only the slightest of hammer and dolly part of a rib either side.

FYI for any 67 B-Body owner. The minimal tank depth for this kit is 6". The Impala tank in this spot is right at 6.5". Just enough










Marked and drilled the mounting holes, then had the ring tack-welded in place.

Action shot!




Got the pump and baffle kit cut to length and put together. Pretty straight forward.






As you can see, not a lot of room between the pump outlet and barbed fitting. This is why there' a 6" minimum tank depth.




Everything is in, buttoned up, and ready to install.








Top of tank prepped for fitment. Used some Permatex Aviation Form-a-Gasket to seal the gasket to both the base of the pump housing, and the top of the tank.






Outlets sit 20mm above the highest point of the tank. I purchased some 3M adhesive back rubber strips to help keep this part from contacting the floor of the vehicle.




All complete!




Here's a shot of the inside. It sits about 2mm off the floor. When I measured and cut, I didn't allow for the thickness of the gasket. Shouldn't be an issue.

The following users liked this post:
rsz288 (02-18-2023)
Old 10-19-2016, 04:33 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Motown 454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: S.E. Ma.
Posts: 686
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Nice job on the install. The tank looks great, like new.
Old 10-19-2016, 04:41 PM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Love the 67 4 door. Very nice work on the install.

Old 10-19-2016, 06:43 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
 
kwhizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,560
Received 167 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Great Job !!!!!!..........Attention to Detail !!!!!
Old 10-19-2016, 08:53 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,106
Received 1,394 Likes on 880 Posts

Default

Good call with the Permatex Aviation sealer. If you want to clean it up some, regular rubbing alcohol works perfectly.

Andrew
The following users liked this post:
rsz288 (02-18-2023)
Old 11-05-2016, 02:51 AM
  #27  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Got the front disc setup installed, and most of the front suspension bushings swapped out to Energy Suspension poly bits.

Tried to clean and repaint as much as I could, but there was a lot of crap to clean. The control arms, spindle, etc, had been coated with a thick black undercoating. media-blaster barely scratched it. Had to wire-wheel it all first. Took an entire day just to get things half decent for painting.

Brackets installed:




Hub and bearings on:








Calipers and rotors are on. Calipers are twin piston, and the rotors are 330mm (13").






Have just enough clearance with my 17" Rallye's.

The following users liked this post:
rsz288 (02-18-2023)
Old 11-05-2016, 05:31 AM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
alocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Nice progress. That bizzarro 65 dash looks so odd but very cool.

I'm surprised to see the calipers mount to the front with a long brake line. Who's kit is that?
Old 11-05-2016, 06:26 AM
  #29  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alocker
Nice progress. That bizzarro 65 dash looks so odd but very cool.

I'm surprised to see the calipers mount to the front with a long brake line. Who's kit is that?
It's a kit put together by a local company called Hopper Stoppers.

The rotors are DBA. The calipers are PBR.

I'm not sure if Hopper Stoppers make the brackets and hubs, or if they're sourced from elsewhere.

I believe, being an aftermarket kit, the front mount calipers are because of clearance issues ... but that's only my assumption. From what I've been able to gather, when it comes to front or rear facing calipers with aftermarket kits - specifically those with larger than factory rotors - clearance seems to be the determining factor.
Old 11-05-2016, 07:34 AM
  #30  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Excellent progress.
Old 02-15-2017, 09:29 PM
  #31  
Teching In
 
Impalaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Russ.W.
Checked their site. Product numbers indicate they're just a re-seller for TanksInc tanks.

Pretty sure I'll go with the Aeromotive Phantom route.

---

Not much else has happened lately. Just been waiting on parts, however a few days ago most arrived on the same day. Felt like Christmas.

Firstly, all my engine mount options showed up.

Knowing that the engine had to be raised slightly to accommodate the Holley 302-1 pan, I purchased the Hooker stock location adapter plates (12611HKR), but also grabbed the CCP LS Swap pedestals (6570MP-LS), which are taller than the stock frame mounts for this very purpose, on 65-70 Chev B-Body's.

Not long after that purchase, I noticed on this very forum, member Ken (kwhizz), and his custom made adapter plates which negate the necessity for replacing or modifying frame mounts. That sounded like a better idea, so I bought a set from him. When I got them, after a small amount of time fingering them in admiration of how simple and sexy they looked, I noticed they were shorter than the Holley adapter plates, and appeared to move the engine forward an inch or so. I dropped Ken a PM, and he said this took care of trans fitment issues.

I already have a 4L60 in my Impala, so I was expecting the change to the 4L65E being a straight swap, ie: use my current trans cross-member and driveshaft - what I didn't account for, however, is with the need to slightly raise the engine, it may create clearance issues in the trans tunnel.

****. This means I'll have to modify the trans cross-member (again), and change the length of my driveshaft (again). That was one place I was hoping I didn't have to spend money.

I think I'll use Ken's plates - they look and feel like a much more solid option - but here's a bunch of pics anyway:

Left: CPP frame mounts. (Part # 6570MP-LS)
Middle: Ken's adapter plates.
Right: Hooker adapter plates. (Part # 12611HKR),






CPP





CPP fitt test with Energy Suspension poly mounts.




Ken v Hooker








Note the machined cut-out on Ken's plates. I thought it was a design cue - turns out it's to accommodate the protrusion on the engine mount pre-load plate:




Also arrived - my DeWitts dirrect-fit LS Swap aluminium radiator with dual 11" fans. Double checked the mounting point measurements once out of the box. Perfect fit.



For those wanting to know, DeWitts offer this in three finishes - Polished, Natural, and Black Ice - and for both Auto and Manual transmission applications. Their website doesn't list the 65-70 B-Body radiators (at all), but Jegs have them listed on their web-store.

For any 65-70 B-Body guy interested, part numbers are:

Auto trans
Polished: 6339016A
Natural Aluminium: 6139016A

Black Ice finish: 6239016A

Manual Trans
Polished: 6339016M
Natural Aluminium: 6139016M
Black Ice: 6239016M

Add a -C to the end of those part numbers if you want chrome fans.












Included with the radiator, for the fans (x2):





Anyways ... that's enough jibbering. Should have another update next week - fingers crossed!
hi russ was just wondering how to get onto ken about purchasing the same adaptor plates that you have please
Old 02-18-2017, 02:11 AM
  #32  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Impalaboy
hi russ was just wondering how to get onto ken about purchasing the same adaptor plates that you have please
Ken is forum member kwhizz. Send him a PM. He's actually replied in this thread so he should be easy to find.
Old 02-18-2017, 04:01 AM
  #33  
Teching In
 
Impalaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Russ.W.
Ken is forum member kwhizz. Send him a PM. He's actually replied in this thread so he should be easy to find.
thanks very much i have found him and have been in contact
Old 02-19-2017, 12:47 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

Its really not fair you Aussies don't have rust issues with your old cars. LOL
Old 02-19-2017, 02:40 PM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dan96z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Grafton MA
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is that brake caliper going to have trouble bleeding the air out with the line on the bottom side?

Great work on this thing! Hadn't checked this post for awhile, very nice progress!
Old 08-30-2017, 04:56 AM
  #36  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Quick update. The swap is all but done. Just waiting on the paperwork from the engineer so I can get it registered.

Will do a more thorough write up of how everything went shortly, but I wanted to update one thing first.

The internal fuel pump. As above, I used the Tanks Inc PA-4 internal module with the Walbro 255lph pump.

Unfortunately, it is loud. Really loud. I can hear it coming up the driveway to the factory, which is about 40 metres away. It's annoying as hell. I was able to compare it to an external Walbro pump used on an LS swapped Land Cruiser, and my internal pump is twice as loud. Pretty disappointed.

Once I've got it on the road, I'm going to swap it out for something else.

Here's a video.

The following users liked this post:
rsz288 (02-18-2023)
Old 08-30-2017, 07:22 AM
  #37  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Aston Tibs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I have the Tanks Inc setup on my Camaro and yes the pump is loud.
Old 08-30-2017, 07:42 AM
  #38  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,106
Received 1,394 Likes on 880 Posts

Default

The one in my Cougar and GTO are also loud. I replaced the one on the Cougar:


Andrew
The following users liked this post:
rsz288 (02-18-2023)
Old 08-30-2017, 07:30 PM
  #39  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Russ.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 49
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
The one in my Cougar and GTO are also loud. I replaced the one on the Cougar:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=S5okXrlVG90

Andrew
Great video Andrew. Thanks for that. Good to see/hear some actual comparisons.

Of course, I read about the DW pumps after I had installed my Walbro.

Is there any reason you went with DW over something like Aeromotive as a replacement? And was the DW pump exactly the same dimensions as the Walbro? My tank is right at the minimum depth requirement, so if the DW pump outlet is even 1/4" longer, it won't work.
Old 08-30-2017, 09:57 PM
  #40  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,106
Received 1,394 Likes on 880 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Russ.W.
Great video Andrew. Thanks for that. Good to see/hear some actual comparisons.

Of course, I read about the DW pumps after I had installed my Walbro.

Is there any reason you went with DW over something like Aeromotive as a replacement? And was the DW pump exactly the same dimensions as the Walbro? My tank is right at the minimum depth requirement, so if the DW pump outlet is even 1/4" longer, it won't work.
Another member here (Michael Yaunt) mentioned that his DW340 was whisper quiet, so I took the chance.

As I recall, and you can maybe see it in the video, but the Walbro 255 and the DW200 are nearly identical externally. I did not change anything with respect to pump depth.

Andrew


Quick Reply: '67 Impala. Factory right-hand drive. 6.0L swap.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.