Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

48 Studebaker LS3 swap Beefing up differential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2019, 08:44 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
48studebakerbusinesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Rensselaer Falls NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 48 Studebaker LS3 swap Beefing up differential

I've got a 9 inch Ford differential out of a 70 Ford Bronco in the Studebaker. I used the stock leaf spring suspension to install it. What do you folks think i should do to beef it up? I have some Stabilizer bars from another rear end ,but they would have to attach from the diff to the back part of the frame(go backwards) instead of towards the front. I have included some pics

here is the 9 inch attached to the leaf springs,the rod and arm going up is actually a shock absorber


these are a pair of stabalizer bars i got off another diff

i could make this work if it would help me,this is going towards the back of the car

i could make this work on both sides ,but this is going towards back, not towards front

Last edited by 48studebakerbusinesc; 03-12-2019 at 09:32 PM.
Old 03-10-2019, 09:03 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
tfi racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar,BC
Posts: 751
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I think an investment in some decent modern shock absorbers are all you really need. What is that funky covering on the leaf springs? I would lose that as well.
Old 03-10-2019, 09:10 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
48studebakerbusinesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Rensselaer Falls NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

covering is pieces of tin,definitely factory as the car only has 29,000 miles,but i have never seen anything like it.
Old 03-10-2019, 10:30 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,914
Received 3,038 Likes on 2,365 Posts
Default

It was done a lot back in the day; look at pre-55 Chevies with torque tubes and Stovebolt 6's. Usually filled with grease.
Old 03-10-2019, 11:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

The covering is a pre-1960's leaf spring thing. They thought it was better to keep dirt and water off the springs - but as many things of the era it didn't work as well as desired.

How much beefing up will be necessary is completely dependent on your driving style and purpose for the car.
One option is running a three or four link if you are a decent fabricator. That eliminates a lot of leaf spring drama - but creates other issues if you haven't done it before. The good part is a multi link suspension is very flexible from a setup perspective, street, road race or drag race.
Old 03-11-2019, 08:26 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

48stude - you wanna beef up the "rear suspension" -- not the differential, fwiw. Adding a fixed length, basically, control arm to a leaf sprung rear is gonna cause some bind. The control arm swings an arc as the suspension moves up and down -- the leaf sprung suspension, not so much. You have to reconcile those two different movement paths. Although it pains me to look at all that.....what shall I call it....patina under the car - I'd say freshen up shocks/leaf spring bushes and drive it before you start changing things. Plenty of vehicles out there with leaf springs, a rear sway bar and traction bars that do reasonably well.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.