Celica tuned and road tested
#42
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're interested I think I could track down all the mounting stuff, headers, driveshaft, radiator and maybe subframe spacers that came off my old car. It hasn't been around for years but the parts are still at a buddy's place.
#44
Man I'd love to do this swap in my 84 GT. This winter I'm thinking maybe a stock 5.3, T56, and a Ford 8.8. Do you have any advice for my potential swap? Other than boost the 5.3 lol. That'll be after I get tired of all that new power
#45
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You probably don't need to do the 8.8 swap right away. I ran mine for a long time before I got axle hop and broke the rear u-joint, never had an issue with the pumpkin itself. The car is a ton of fun with that much power.
#46
TECH Addict
Why do people keep saying that this is a sleeper?
It's a rwd Toyota... when has anyone, ever, left a rwd Toyota unmolested? The supra is a Celica, and supras are generally considered to be fast... not sleeper... cars, so why would you just assume any other rwd Celica to be slow? Everyone and their brother stuffs single turbo 2jz motors in those things and drive them into the 10's all the time.
There's nothing "sleeper" about any rwd Toyota... Just too many 2jz swaps driving around to think for a second that it would be slow.
Anyways, to the OP, nice work, sir. Nothing like a 6000 mile road trip to make sure you did it right. Really cool car. Good job.
It's a rwd Toyota... when has anyone, ever, left a rwd Toyota unmolested? The supra is a Celica, and supras are generally considered to be fast... not sleeper... cars, so why would you just assume any other rwd Celica to be slow? Everyone and their brother stuffs single turbo 2jz motors in those things and drive them into the 10's all the time.
There's nothing "sleeper" about any rwd Toyota... Just too many 2jz swaps driving around to think for a second that it would be slow.
Anyways, to the OP, nice work, sir. Nothing like a 6000 mile road trip to make sure you did it right. Really cool car. Good job.
#47
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most people I met didn't even realize it was rwd, they just assumed that a celica would be fwd since every one made since 1986 has been. That combined with smog Era styling and a generally faded paint job and my car would often get overlooked. It changed a little when I put 275/40/17s all the way around but not many people noticed that till it was too late.
Nobody suspected it, hence sleeper.
Nobody suspected it, hence sleeper.
Why do people keep saying that this is a sleeper?
It's a rwd Toyota... when has anyone, ever, left a rwd Toyota unmolested? The supra is a Celica, and supras are generally considered to be fast... not sleeper... cars, so why would you just assume any other rwd Celica to be slow? Everyone and their brother stuffs single turbo 2jz motors in those things and drive them into the 10's all the time.
There's nothing "sleeper" about any rwd Toyota... Just too many 2jz swaps driving around to think for a second that it would be slow.
Anyways, to the OP, nice work, sir. Nothing like a 6000 mile road trip to make sure you did it right. Really cool car. Good job.
It's a rwd Toyota... when has anyone, ever, left a rwd Toyota unmolested? The supra is a Celica, and supras are generally considered to be fast... not sleeper... cars, so why would you just assume any other rwd Celica to be slow? Everyone and their brother stuffs single turbo 2jz motors in those things and drive them into the 10's all the time.
There's nothing "sleeper" about any rwd Toyota... Just too many 2jz swaps driving around to think for a second that it would be slow.
Anyways, to the OP, nice work, sir. Nothing like a 6000 mile road trip to make sure you did it right. Really cool car. Good job.
#48
TECH Addict
I guess my limited knowledge of what those cars are capable of disqualifies me from the "most people" category.
Granted, I've seen people call their corvette a sleeper. As well as several cts-v "sleeper" builds. Apparently most people are easily fooled into thinking these cars are slow. Lol.
You have yourself a rad Celica. Please don't let my rants about the definition of the term "sleeper" subtract from how awesome your car is.
Granted, I've seen people call their corvette a sleeper. As well as several cts-v "sleeper" builds. Apparently most people are easily fooled into thinking these cars are slow. Lol.
You have yourself a rad Celica. Please don't let my rants about the definition of the term "sleeper" subtract from how awesome your car is.
#49
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Ever seen what a stock TPI C4 Corvette runs in the 1/4 mile? Not what I would call fast by any measure...
That Celica is a sleeper if it's quiet. Most don't even know wtf it is, let alone that it's RWD and that someone can swap a V8 into it.
Some people call my car a sleeper, but I don't know about that...
That Celica is a sleeper if it's quiet. Most don't even know wtf it is, let alone that it's RWD and that someone can swap a V8 into it.
Some people call my car a sleeper, but I don't know about that...
#50
TECH Addict
I don't want to muddy up this thread debating the clearly arbitrary definition of "sleeper". Obviously the definition changes from person to person.
Went round for round on a mustang forum when the Hellcat Challenger first came out. We argued back and forth about the definition of muscle car vs. pony car... blah blah blah.
Ultimately, it boils down to different strokes for different folks.
Sleeper or not, the OP has a damn cool celica.
Went round for round on a mustang forum when the Hellcat Challenger first came out. We argued back and forth about the definition of muscle car vs. pony car... blah blah blah.
Ultimately, it boils down to different strokes for different folks.
Sleeper or not, the OP has a damn cool celica.
#53
TECH Senior Member
#54
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, 4 year old thread revival.
To make it fit: empty engine bay, place engine in bay, modify all parts as needed during reinstall. Super simple.
All joking aside: lower front subframe, use RCAs to keep geometry close, move radiator in front of cross member, hammer firewall to make room for headers, build custom headers, build engine mounts, cut hole in hood for carbarator (did I spell it right?), built mount for transmission, extend rod on gas pedal to get correct pull length for carburetor. That will make it fit, then you have to sort out fuel system, cooling system, gauges, fans, starter wiring, etc. Good luck!
To make it fit: empty engine bay, place engine in bay, modify all parts as needed during reinstall. Super simple.
All joking aside: lower front subframe, use RCAs to keep geometry close, move radiator in front of cross member, hammer firewall to make room for headers, build custom headers, build engine mounts, cut hole in hood for carbarator (did I spell it right?), built mount for transmission, extend rod on gas pedal to get correct pull length for carburetor. That will make it fit, then you have to sort out fuel system, cooling system, gauges, fans, starter wiring, etc. Good luck!
#55
TECH Senior Member
Carburetor...… carbureted.... school over.... just use EFI!
#57
TECH Senior Member
No such thing...
And the fact that you are talking about a carbureted 350 shows you have no idea what you are doing OR where you are posting. This is a forum about GM LS engines, which do NOT include 350's.
And the fact that you are talking about a carbureted 350 shows you have no idea what you are doing OR where you are posting. This is a forum about GM LS engines, which do NOT include 350's.
Last edited by G Atsma; 04-02-2019 at 02:02 PM.
#58
novice panicking?
Sry this is my first swap. just saw the reply. We are sitting at the table digusing it. agreed efi would be better and cheaper in the long run . I have a t5 transmission any insight on that . I was thinking if not maybe an r700.
#59
Thanks this has helped
Konwing what I'm getting into really helps. It's a 350 out of a van 4 bolt main. thinking of keeping the stock exoust manifolds. Do u think that might help? Or just costom headers?
Wow, 4 year old thread revival.
To make it fit: empty engine bay, place engine in bay, modify all parts as needed during reinstall. Super simple.
All joking aside: lower front subframe, use RCAs to keep geometry close, move radiator in front of cross member, hammer firewall to make room for headers, build custom headers, build engine mounts, cut hole in hood for carbarator (did I spell it right?), built mount for transmission, extend rod on gas pedal to get correct pull length for carburetor. That will make it fit, then you have to sort out fuel system, cooling system, gauges, fans, starter wiring, etc. Good luck!
To make it fit: empty engine bay, place engine in bay, modify all parts as needed during reinstall. Super simple.
All joking aside: lower front subframe, use RCAs to keep geometry close, move radiator in front of cross member, hammer firewall to make room for headers, build custom headers, build engine mounts, cut hole in hood for carbarator (did I spell it right?), built mount for transmission, extend rod on gas pedal to get correct pull length for carburetor. That will make it fit, then you have to sort out fuel system, cooling system, gauges, fans, starter wiring, etc. Good luck!
#60
TECH Senior Member
Take this to a forum that deals with the old small block Chevy. This forum is about LS engines. You might get more answers there.