Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

L92 Casting #'s - what's the diff?

Old Jan 19, 2011 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
cdig's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default L92 Casting #'s - what's the diff?

I'm looking at a couple different sets of L92 heads to put on a LQ4 6.0L, just wondering what the difference might be between the casting #'s ? ie. casting # 823 vs. 821 ? Is there a physical or performance difference? Is there a casting I should stay away from for any reason?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 08:56 PM
  #2  
Project GatTagO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,608
Likes: 1,881
From: Little Austin
Default

Originally Posted by cdig
I'm looking at a couple different sets of L92 heads to put on a LQ4 6.0L, just wondering what the difference might be between the casting #'s ? ie. casting # 823 vs. 821 ? Is there a physical or performance difference? Is there a casting I should stay away from for any reason?

Thanks!
I believe that functionally they are all the same.

Andrew
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 09:02 AM
  #3  
rsz288's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 828
Likes: 12
From: Right here, right now!
Default

Originally Posted by cdig
I'm looking at a couple different sets of L92 heads to put on a LQ4 6.0L, just wondering what the difference might be between the casting #'s ? ie. casting # 823 vs. 821 ? Is there a physical or performance difference? Is there a casting I should stay away from for any reason?

Thanks!
They are all good. Later heads went to rotocasting method.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 11:33 AM
  #4  
bozzhawg's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
Likes: 4
From: REALITY
Default

Originally Posted by cdig
I'm looking at a couple different sets of L92 heads to put on a LQ4 6.0L, just wondering what the difference might be between the casting #'s ? ie. casting # 823 vs. 821 ? Is there a physical or performance difference? Is there a casting I should stay away from for any reason?

Thanks!
821= LS3/ Hollow stem intake valve/ yellow beehive springs

823= L92/ Steel intake valve/ stock springs..

Some say the 821's have a smoother finish....

reality both are the same castings, and both had some not so smooth areas but in different locations.... Nothing crazy.... I did not even touch em(port em or polish em), I just popped em on... besides milling and spring kit....

Bozz
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #5  
Jimbo1367's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 660
Default

5364 IIRC from my 08 LY6
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
tsnow678's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
From: Germanton, N.C.
Default

Is it #5364? I was thinking it was #3564. Either way the difference between these and the #823 are the #5364 were cast in green sand and have a smoother finish in the ports and combustion chambers. SLP grabs all of these smoother heads from production. I tried to get a set when I bought my #823's but they looked at me like I was stupid.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.