HEADERS that will fit my 1965 Chevelle LS2
I ordered these off of ebay. I have not mounted them yet, but the they look to be really good quality. All the welds look really good.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...K%3AMEWNX%3AIT
I am going to put then in my 72 Chevelle.
Tim.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...K%3AMEWNX%3AIT
I am going to put then in my 72 Chevelle.
Tim.
Trending Topics
just a note about the hookers... I just finished installing them last weekend and the thing I noticed is not ground clearance but floor clearance. I mounted my engine a bit higher than the hooker mounts probably would to get adequate clearance for the oil pan to tie rod (f-body pan). The passenger side mount is right up on the floor. Instead of lowering the engine I chose to clearance the floor. Anyway, if the engine is back far enough and not too high, these fit the 65 chevelle well. You can see the floor clearance in the pic.
i also fitted them with a 3 bolt flange because I didn't really like the slip fit idea,
the other one shows the stock spark plugs bump into the primary tube...they may work with some trimming or else I will have to find some smaller ones.
i also fitted them with a 3 bolt flange because I didn't really like the slip fit idea,
the other one shows the stock spark plugs bump into the primary tube...they may work with some trimming or else I will have to find some smaller ones.
just a note about the hookers... I just finished installing them last weekend and the thing I noticed is not ground clearance but floor clearance. I mounted my engine a bit higher than the hooker mounts probably would to get adequate clearance for the oil pan to tie rod (f-body pan). The passenger side mount is right up on the floor. Instead of lowering the engine I chose to clearance the floor. Anyway, if the engine is back far enough and not too high, these fit the 65 chevelle well. You can see the floor clearance in the pic.
i also fitted them with a 3 bolt flange because I didn't really like the slip fit idea,
the other one shows the stock spark plugs bump into the primary tube...they may work with some trimming or else I will have to find some smaller ones.
i also fitted them with a 3 bolt flange because I didn't really like the slip fit idea,
the other one shows the stock spark plugs bump into the primary tube...they may work with some trimming or else I will have to find some smaller ones.
Tom
I used the stepped header's from edelbrock and the worked great,I did however use there motor mount plates too!
Last edited by baker163; May 8, 2011 at 02:53 PM. Reason: post a pic
I used the Doug's headers on my 65 Skylark. There is no way to use them with the Edelbrock adapter mounts which are pretty much the same as the Doug's and the Hooker mounts. The engine needed to be up and back an inch to get them to work and get the steering to clear the oil pan, so I made custom mounts. The clearance problems on my build for the Doug's headers is the passenger floor board and the drivers frame rail. With the custom motor mount frame stands, I was able to locate the engine in the perfect position to make it work, but the engine location has to be just perfect. It is pretty much a game to get the engine high enough to clear the pan while still allowing the headers adequate clearance.
Andrew
The port spacing on a BBC and an LSx engine are nowhere close to being in the same place. NOt to mention the fact that a BBC is much taller, so even if you were to get the port flange to work, the headers would hang way too low when bolted to an LSx engine.
Andrew
Andrew









