newest time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2005, 12:31 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Cop Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default newest time

13.08 @ 107 2.0 60'

the one time i had a 1.9 60' i accidently downshifted and hit rev limiter and ran a 13.1 @ 103

this is on a stock car, only modifications were removing most of the interior (had the dash and a drivers seat and seatbelt) and drag radials THATS IT, paper filter ect still stock... so close to breaking 13.000 that it hurts
Old 09-14-2005, 10:36 AM
  #2  
AOC
TECH Regular
 
AOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: STL
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn good time for a stock car, congrats.
Old 09-14-2005, 11:10 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (19)
 
Bryan @ Speed Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

wow... awesome. i ran a 13.02 w/ a 1.98 60' with a catback and a lid on drag radials. weight reduction is something i need to start looking into.
Old 09-14-2005, 02:03 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

bear in mind this is an a4 with 140k on it. cool as hell if you ask me...
Old 09-14-2005, 02:12 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Cop Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

removing the interior didnt net that much weight loss, i used manual track drivers seat, had the drivers seatbelt, dash was there, but no radio everything else was gone from the car, it looks like it cut less than 200 lbs off of the car, not worth it IMO...



Quick Reply: newest time



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.