What performance to expect from 422 in a 4A?
I have an ARE 422 (4.1 bore and 4.0 stroke), ARE Stage 2 5.7 litre heads, (not sure about cam specs), Yank PT3900, Grotyohann 1-3/4 longtubes, ORY, shift kit, LS6 intake, 3.73:1 rear gears, 4 HAL adj. shocks, torque arm, front k frame, and some other, more minor, mods
Dyno: 454rwhp (tranny locked); torque not measurable, but likely over 500; A/F 12.6:1
Weight: 3408 lb. + driver + gas ~ 3612 lb.
Track performance (only two track appearances thus far):
11.85 at 117 mph on ET Streets at 14 PSI cold (60' was 1.7X)
12.4X at 117 mph on street tires (60' ranged from 2.2-2.0)
All runs have yielded trap speeds between 115-high 117. Have not engaged tranny lockup on any run.
Caveats: on both occasions, track was slippery and weather seemed to hurt (other cars in attendance were down in mph and up in ET)
I believe the car should (will) ET in the low 11s. Not sure what mph to expect, though.
I think something isnt right somewhere (tuning, trans, etc?). I am sure you will figure it out though. I would think mid-high 10's@125-127+mph should be the goal to shoot for.
Cheers,
Chris
John
I have like a 3600 yank, and I am going to a 4500 this week. I think a 10.8 is very doable at 2200 DA, but I think a 10.6 is possible with better weather.
Play with your combo, I dropped .14 just from correctly adjusting my 1-2 shiftpoint... I could use an increase of 200-300 rpms upward for my 2-3 shift and I think I'd see 124mph from that the shift ARM is sad it drops to like 4500.
<small>[ September 22, 2002, 08:01 PM: Message edited by: Colonel ]</small>
Col., the cam is not mild at all. Wade asked if I wanted a "big" cam. Will find out specs this week. Motor is not set up for nitrous. I don't have the head flow numbers but I will get them.
Chris, my mph was 115.X with my Stage 2 heads/cam combo, so I have gained approx. 2 mph since then. Then again, I often used my tranny lockup, so perhaps I have gained more than 2 mph considering that I haven't used it with the 422. I understand you gained something like 3-4 mph with the lockup.
Trending Topics
Then next you need to go on Colonel's special weight reduction plan. <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
John
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Good luck getting it figured out <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Cheers,
Chris
I think the 200R tranny in my car liked the lockup better than a 4L60E. I think I ran 120 with no lockup and right around 122.6mph with lockup.
Cheers,
Chris
There are some great running NA ARE setups out there <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
I think Steve needs to find out what is going on with his car.
i think you mean unlocked. especially since you say your torque is "unmeasurable"
what is the peak?
how can you spend 15g's and not know what cam you have?
ARE has come a long way lately (almost far enough for me to like them), but if it really only makes 450rw locked, you need to send it back.
<strong>I get about 1.5mph from mine. What's with all these ARE cars lately? Unless they run juice they seem to run subpar. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah, mine is really slow. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
I'd look into shiftpoints steve.
Post an entire slip, one where you raced on ET Streets.
John
11.04
1.53
7.0 1/8th
98mph 1/8th
122mph
Terry no offense but I don't care how you run. Your car is lighter than mine by a lot. I am NOW at 3500 raceweight and I was at 3650 raceweight. I'll get to 3450 raceweight but that's it, I refuse to take out more weight.
Terry no offense but I don't care how you run. Your car is lighter than mine by a lot. I am NOW at 3500 raceweight and I was at 3650 raceweight. I'll get to 3450 raceweight but that's it, I refuse to take out more weight.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You make it sound like you have a choice! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> We both have the same stuff removed (AC, light weight carpet, seats, light weight exhaust, kmember, aarms), yet you are somehow 260# heavier. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
Look at Campbell's car. That's a perfect example of a well thought out package. All of the components comliment each other and work well together to make a stout package.
At the beginning of last year, my car barely ran in the 11's. With the same heads/cam and better matching of parts (gears/converter/exhaust/etc), I ran 10.8's in about the same weather. I had to bust my *** and change a bunch of stuff around to make improvements like that, but it taught me a lot.
Maybe it's strictly coincidence that some of the "subpar" performers have ARE engines. I don't want to name names (if I could even remember them), but I have seen cars from all the major shops out there that didn't seem to live up to their potential and/or expectations.
Yeah, my car is somewhat lightweight (3120lbs). But it runs 10.20's. Would it slow down to 11.50's if it was a more portly 3600lbs? No. Nick and Wade built me a heck of an engine, but I don't think they put any extra special "magic" in it that doesn't go into any other engine that comes out of their shop. My whole combination works together.



