hooking = better mph...
thanks
The loss in mph is due to tire growth, not the hook.
I always thought that more traction would = MPH increase. But the outcome is different.
I mean.. How do you gain more MPH when you are spinning? It is weird. But more traction does tend to lower you MPH for some reason.
Last edited by Keenov; Aug 9, 2004 at 11:54 AM.
Trending Topics
What if you spun through the whole 1/4, would you have a better MPH than actually hooking up from the get go?
I was thinking that, since the tires are spinning and the motor is revving higher, when you finally get traction the car takes off faster. Which increases MPH but lowers ET, since you were spinning
If you can even understand what I just wrote... lol!!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Everytime I put on a DOT tire compared to street tires I gain 2-4mph and 8tenths to 1 second. everytime
Everytime I put on a DOT tire compared to street tires I gain 2-4mph and 8tenths to 1 second. everytime
. Everytime I put on a DOT tire compared to street tires I gain 2-4mph and 8tenths to 1 second. everytime
I would say you are right. Cause I am sure I will be gaining atleast 2 or more MPH. I spin at the top of first and all of second (even when lifting) and I get a little sideways in third. I am sure some stickier tires would straighten that out and improve my MPH/ET. If not, I am pissed
For auto guys it's a little simpler. You don't have a bog (well, unless you're using a stock or too tight TQ converter) so tire spin only serves to shorten the track. All else being equal (meaning that your haven't changed the tire size or weight), auto cars will normally see better trap speeds when hooking.
You should rethink this logic. Yes, when you hook you are farther down the track at a given time interval but how did you get there? You accelerated quicker which means that you are at a higher MPH at any given point on the track. When you spin you're wasting track while not picking up MPH very quickly. This leaves you with a shorter track ahead of you once you do finally hook. You are also at a lower MPH at that point on the track than what you would have been if you'd been accelerating during that distance rather than spinning.
I hope that made sense.
1. They are almost always taller than the street tire they replace which takes away mechanical advantage. This is no different than using a numerically lower rearend ratio.
2. They are almost always heavier and since they are also taller, this weight travels are longer arch...farther away from the center of rotation.
3. Slicks have larger AND stickier contact patches. This means more rolling resistance.
4. Slicks have softer rubber and more flexible sidewalls. Any flex (that is motion) that takes place is wasted energy. Also, more energy is converted into heat due to this flexing and rolling resistance rather than being used to accelerate that car.
1. They are almost always taller than the street tire they replace which takes away mechanical advantage. This is no different than using a numerically lower rearend ratio.
2. They are almost always heavier and since they are also taller, this weight travels are longer arch...farther away from the center of rotation.
3. Slicks have larger AND stickier contact patches. This means more rolling resistance.
4. Slicks have softer rubber and more flexible sidewalls. Any flex (that is motion) that takes place is wasted energy. Also, more energy is converted into heat due to this flexing and rolling resistance rather than being used to accelerate that car.


