Fastest LS1 in the 1/8th mile?
<strong> I ran 6.25 all motor. The fastest LS1 (nitrous) ran 8.97 in the 1/4 I believe. That should be somewhere around a 5.71 in the 1/8. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Hey there,
Just wondering something. What kind of 0-60mph times will my car be capable of when it's done. Assume a 10.90 1/4 mile on ET's.
<strong> It would have more to do with your 60 ft time than your ET. I know that at a 1.37 60 ft time, it and your 0-60 cross. So, my 0-60 time is 1.37. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" /> You could do the same. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I meant a 0-60mph in how many seconds, not the 60ft time.
later,
Steve
<strong> thats what Colonel is talking about. when you run a 1.37 60' time you go 0-60mph in 1.37 seconds. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
later,
Steve </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
So when my bone stock WS6 did a 2.1 60' on my time-slip, I went from 0-60 mph in 1.90 seconds. I think not.
The 60 FOOT time can't be the same as 0-60 mph.
Stock WS6's and Vettes can't do 0-60 in 2 seconds.
Please explain this to me, it's not adding up.
Trending Topics
<strong> Hey there,
Just wondering something. What kind of 0-60mph times will my car be capable of when it's done. Assume a 10.90 1/4 mile on ET's. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Hey Lyle!
It is very hard to predict with 100% accuracy your 0 to 60 mph time. There are a lot of variables such as traction,track conditions,weight of vehicle, U, etc.
I would hazard a guess of 0 to 60 mph anyhwere from 3.0 to 4.2 seconds ! Now if U are shooting for a record or something head directly to slicks and get the ultimate rear gearing ! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong> thats what Colonel is talking about. when you run a 1.37 60' time you go 0-60mph in 1.37 seconds. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
later,
Steve </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">"INCORECT" <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" /> 60' time is the amount of time it takes your cars front tires to go from the staged beam to breaking the beam at the 60' mark! <img border="0" alt="[burn out]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_burnout.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />
The more traction U have the more power U can put down so the quicker this time should be! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
See diagram: http://www.crdragway.com/new_page_10.htm
Kevin
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Top Fuel:
<strong> thats what Colonel is talking about. when you run a 1.37 60' time you go 0-60mph in 1.37 seconds. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
later,
Steve </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
So when my bone stock WS6 did a 2.1 60' on my time-slip, I went from 0-60 mph in 1.90 seconds. I think not.
The 60 FOOT time can't be the same as 0-60 mph.
Stock WS6's and Vettes can't do 0-60 in 2 seconds.
Please explain this to me, it's not adding up. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">no, I didn't mean to say that your 0-60mph time matches your 60' time. Only in the case of the 1.37 60' does it match.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Top Fuel:
<strong> thats what Colonel is talking about. when you run a 1.37 60' time you go 0-60mph in 1.37 seconds. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
later,
Steve </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">"INCORECT" <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" /> 60' time is the amount of time it takes your cars front tires to go from the staged beam to breaking the beam at the 60' mark! <img border="0" alt="[burn out]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_burnout.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />
The more traction U have the more power U can put down so the quicker this time should be! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
See diagram: http://www.crdragway.com/new_page_10.htm </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">NO! CORRECT <img border="0" alt="[judgement]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" /> Everything in that statement is true.
here, let me try again. when you run a 1.37 60' time, you go 0-60mph in 1.37 seconds. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_images/icons/tongue.gif" />
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Quickin:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Top Fuel:
<strong> thats what Colonel is talking about. when you run a 1.37 60' time you go 0-60mph in 1.37 seconds. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
later,
Steve </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
So when my bone stock WS6 did a 2.1 60' on my time-slip, I went from 0-60 mph in 1.90 seconds. I think not.
The 60 FOOT time can't be the same as 0-60 mph.
Stock WS6's and Vettes can't do 0-60 in 2 seconds.
Please explain this to me, it's not adding up. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">no, I didn't mean to say that your 0-60mph time matches your 60' time. Only in the case of the 1.37 60' does it match. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">OK, so just that exact example do the 2 times match, 1.37.
People just always ask what my car will be able to do from 0-60 mph. I don't know what to tell them. I usually tell them that it should do it in 3-3.5 seconds, but I'm only guessing. Regular people have no clue what 60 ft., 1/8 mile & 1/4 mile times are, but everyone can relate to a 0-60 mph time.
Steve
1.37 60 ft puts you at 59.7 MPH.
That's all I was saying. I don't have any way of knowing how accurate that calculator is. It's just something I came across somehow.
<strong> As I said before, it just so happens that in general, a 1.37 60ft time equals about 60 MPH as calculated by this... http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/60_foot.php
1.37 60 ft puts you at 59.7 MPH.
That's all I was saying. I don't have any way of knowing how accurate that calculator is. It's just something I came across somehow. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">1.363-1.364 60' = 60mph according to that calculator.


