Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lightweight battery vs battery in trunk?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 06:39 AM
  #21  
smokinHawk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

i just used a LW battery up front, you dont have to worry about relocating it and running wires to the back and that hassle, and it saves a good amount of weight and room up front.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #22  
ChrisJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Thanks for the posts everyone.

Let me run this idea by you guys and see what you think... A lot of people go with the light battery to save weight, but leave it in the front.. No one runs it in the rear.. And a lot of people think running a battery in the rear is a lot of hassle.

My idea.. I dont have HVAC or really anything behind the dash, no radio, no ac controls, it basically just covers up empty space. I have enough room for a full size battery behind there I would guess. Would putting the lightweight battery in the passenger side area where HVAC used to go be of any benefit? It would be lighter than having a full size battery in the trunk, get the few more lbs off the nose of the car and more towards the middle (even though its not the rear, its not the very front either and I think it might help weight transfer some), and still have short wires running to the ground and the starter so Id think it would still be able to crank the car (Ive heard that the reason lightweights dont work in the trunk is because they dont have enough juice to travel thru the long wires and still crank the car.. That may be incorrect, but thats what Ive always been told when I mentioned putting the LW battery in the back)... Whats the opinion on that? Waste of time? Only reason I consider it is because I need as much underhood space as possible, Im working on a turbo setup.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #23  
Joe99SS's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

If I'm not mistaken, once you move the battery from stock location, you need to have a kill switch in the rear. So while it would help, you'd still have to run the wiring to the rear in order to remain legal. Or at least from my interpretation of the rules.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #24  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

No big deal to run a shut of switch...
I'm gonna put one in when the finally tell me to do it
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #25  
383ss's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, KS
Default

Originally Posted by JS
It should be on the RS.....
I just did th LW battery in the rear just for racing 24lb savings
you did a lightweight in the rear?? how is it working and for how long has it worked?? what type of battery??
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #26  
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 1
From: McComb, MS
Default

Originally Posted by 383ss
you did a lightweight in the rear?? how is it working and for how long has it worked?? what type of battery??
yea, no kidding, i heard that you lost to may ca's going that far on a small batt. do you run the fans, ewp and all off it also while in the lanes.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #27  
BLK02WS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 1
From: on the dyno tuning in MD
Default

IMO, the lightweight in the front is the way to go - it is cheap, easy, and saves 25 pounds off the front of the car. I think when you add the weight of all the cable to put a battery in the rear, you loose the benefit of any weight transfer.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 12:57 AM
  #28  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

Wrong,my cable and ends weighed 10lbs so I had a 40lbs Optima up front with the battery holddown and overflow bottle which was just about 10lbs which equals it out.

Mightymouse told me to keep a battery tender on the LW bat when I'm not driving the car to keep it fully charged.

I dont have a EWP since its worth nothing and I dont turn my fans on in the pits,My car runs fine waiting in line.

I will try this LW Oddessy 680 for a while and see if I have issues,If I do then I'll just use it for racing and put the Optiama back in the car when I'm driving the car.

It was worth 24lbs to me.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 01:45 AM
  #29  
2FAST4U's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: F.H,Waterford,Port Huron, MI
Default

Then why do all the "top Dogs" have there battery's in the back? Weight? I mean I did it B/C I have to have a Optima and would like that battery weight in the back! I cleans up space at least I can't say if it is better in weight transfer, I mean I am sure it is but as the motor/front end out weights the rear by so much I can;t see how anyone could see a differance by only moving 25lb when a motor weights 400lb!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #30  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

Just moving 40lbs to the rear of the car acts like 80lbs
The bat in the trunk is a good idea,I;ve done it to 3 cars I've had in the past.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #31  
383ss's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, KS
Default

Originally Posted by 2FAST4U
Then why do all the "top Dogs" have there battery's in the back? Weight? I mean I did it B/C I have to have a Optima and would like that battery weight in the back! I cleans up space at least I can't say if it is better in weight transfer, I mean I am sure it is but as the motor/front end out weights the rear by so much I can;t see how anyone could see a differance by only moving 25lb when a motor weights 400lb!
every little bit helps. by your logic then why do ANY weight reductions!? none that you can do in the front are over 40lbs, most a lot less.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #32  
Race Car Driver's Avatar
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Default

I'm just relaying our experiences and trying to save you some money, particularly those with daily drivers. This is yet another example of chopping-up a street car, that will cost you money making the mod and again when you try to sell the car. I turned a 2001 SS into a 8-second car and I know firsthand the negative consequences of such mods. JMHO.

Go ahead and try it: leave the stock cables and mount in-place, install the battery in the rear compartment, make some runs with it in the front and then in the rear, and compare your times. We're talking at most a few 100ths of a second, maybe.

Last edited by bickelfirebird; Jan 12, 2005 at 09:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #33  
PewterZ28's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
From: St.Louis, MO
Default

Well, for me it's all about the air time. I want those front tires off the ground and hanging in the air for a second. With a 40lb battery up front/right it sure makes it harder to get that right front tire off the ground.

I can't see how moving the battery to the rear will do anything but help with weight transfer and hooking up. If your car is a drag car and you don't care about resale value, why not do it?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #34  
Race Car Driver's Avatar
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Default

Originally Posted by PewterZ28
If your car is a drag car and you don't care about resale value, why not do it?
The vast majority of cars at this site are street cars and I am directing my comments toward them. If yours is really a "drag" car and your going all-out, then go for it, but don't expect much improvement.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #35  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

I have to agree,this is drag race mod..
I'd do the LW battery in the front in most cases.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #36  
chpmnsws6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 2
From: Springfield IL
Default

Originally Posted by Joe99SS
If I'm not mistaken, once you move the battery from stock location, you need to have a kill switch in the rear. So while it would help, you'd still have to run the wiring to the rear in order to remain legal. Or at least from my interpretation of the rules.

not always
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:46 AM
  #37  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Lightweight Hawker up front here (just ran it for the first time last week, worked well), I'm just happy to save the 20-22 pounds off the nose without the hassle of running 'weight adding' cables/boxes/cut off switches etc and the ease of just putting the stock one back in the stock location if/when needed.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 10:56 AM
  #38  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

The bat box/cables and switch add about 12lbs if done correctly..Your overflow and battery tray up`front are 7 to 10lbs so u gain a whopping 4lbs when going to the rear of the car with a trunk mount BUT I mounted a small catch can for the rad. that holds only a qt. of coolant.This saves 8lbs which then gives u a LOSS of 1 to 4 lbs compared to running the battery up front

See some guys really check into this stuff,with my Hawker in the trunk I'm down easily 25lbs and get the benefit of better weight tranfer but if your a weekend drag racer then just mount it up front...

Last edited by JS; Jan 13, 2005 at 11:32 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #39  
S_J_H's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Downers Grove,IL
Default

I was running with a rear mounted batt,box, cutoff switch. I ended up just throwing it all away and put a nice simple small 13lb batt up front.
I can't see any reason to have a 7-10lb tray and overflow bottle up front though . My 1qt overflow and simple hold down might weigh 1lb.
If you need the larger battery for reserve capacity then it's probably best to put it in the rear.
Steve
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #40  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

Correct,if u drive the car everyday the battery up front is ****.
I guess u make a good point,If I put the Hawker back up front w/the small catch can and use a piece of alum to mount the small Bat I'd actually be even lighter than now.

Hmmm,something to think about SJM
Thanx....

Last edited by JS; Jan 13, 2005 at 12:25 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE