swapped cams and added FAST 78

It shouldnt really take many pulls to tune it with those similiar cams. IMO[/QUOTE]
those 2 cams aren't as similar as you think..
I agree with you. I was just talking about AFR. If he just AutoVe, he could generally have it done in a few pulls. Would have took a few more to get it the optimal timing it liked and etc.
1. At 3000 RPM's both cams made 188 HP but the X1 had 330 rwtq and fti 325 rwtq.
2. At 3500 RPM's X1 made 238 rwhp at 360 rwtq and fti made 240 rwhp at 360 rwtq.
I know its not that big of a deal just woundering how come the charts don't add up.
1. At 3000 RPM's both cams made 188 HP but the X1 had 330 rwtq and fti 325 rwtq.
2. At 3500 RPM's X1 made 238 rwhp at 360 rwtq and fti made 240 rwhp at 360 rwtq.
I know its not that big of a deal just woundering how come the charts don't add up.
fueling/airflow WOT from 4000 up is strictly MAF based anyways...your VE table would have no say in calculating airflow...most dynos start at 3000ish...so from 3000-4000 airflow is calculated from MAP/MAF sensor...but he could have fudged the maf table in that portion for desired afr
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time


