Dyno jet VS Superflow?
It is possible to do "step tests" or constant speed tests with the eddy current brakes. There's a max of 500+ rwhp over a couple of minute steady-state run, but few of us with that much rwhp want to hold it at max hp rpm for multiple minutes.
IMO, an important use of the eddy current brakes added to the inertia drum, is that you can duplicate the actual time you car accelerates say from 2500 to 6500 in 4th gear (M6), so you get an accurate rwhp reading. If you then use a power adder, in inertia mode a 200 shot would cause the inertia only dyno to accelerate faster, and you'd get a falsely low rwhp reading compared to your NA run. No so with inertia + eddy current controlled run.
My $.02
"The difference between dynos could be alot of things. The calibration, the drums weight, the correction factors, the load, etc... For example a Mustang dyno will dyno less than a dyno Jet by 8% sometimes. Based on what MSiska experince with both dynos... 293/329=0.890 and his friends= 330/364=0.90 which means that superflow is 10-12% higher than a dyno jet. Thats means u should be making around 344-350rwhp. Maybe they werent surprised by their numbers because they always use this same dyno. If they used a dyno jet or especially a mustang dyno they will be crying lol."






