2010 Camaro LS3, MTI Stage 3 cam/headers Dyno
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego/Tracy CA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey all -
2010 Camaro
MTI stage 3 cam
valve springs, pushrods, ect
Stainless works 2" Primaries headers.
Rotofab Intake
Put down 460rwhp and 415rwtq on a dynojet. Graph will be up tomorrow.
2010 Camaro
MTI stage 3 cam
valve springs, pushrods, ect
Stainless works 2" Primaries headers.
Rotofab Intake
Put down 460rwhp and 415rwtq on a dynojet. Graph will be up tomorrow.
#4
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Any specs on the MTI stage 3 cam?! I'd have to agree that I'd also be a lil bit disappointed and I think those 2' primaries are way to big for a stock cube LS3. Just my opinion tho...
#6
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Its a big cam. I wouldnt be too worried about the torque value. When I cammed my LS2 I only picked up 12 tq but I was making almost 50whp more than stock in the upper rpms. Cam only cars arent really torque monsters. Some ported heads would probably up that number.
That being said Im sure your car screams from 4000- redline.
That being said Im sure your car screams from 4000- redline.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well that would pose another problem in my opinion as the square port LS3 heads don't like big cams with a lot of overlap which could be why he didn't pick up any torque. But I agree that dyno's are really just tuning tools and the numbers are just for bragging rights. If it performs well, that's all that matters at the end of the day.