Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Why is my torque so low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2010, 11:49 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GM PHASST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why is my torque so low?

I dynoed 310 rwhp and 246 rwtq about three weeks ago. The car has 3" cat-back, longtubes and air lid. Not sure what brands tho. Other than those three mods the car is a stock 99 ls1 camaro w/m6 and 3.42 gears.
With the exhaust cutout plate off the car dynoed 326 rwhp and 195 rwtq and with the air filter and cutout plate off it dynoed 329 rwhp and 190 rwtq.
I know that with the exhaust cutout plate off I would lose low end. But it's like I never had any to begin with.
The drivers side cat has about a 1 1/2"-2" crack in it. Could that be causing the low torque numbers.
I gotta go so I will check back later. Thanx for any input.
Old 06-10-2010, 01:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If that is on a dynojet, you need to shut the car down and start doing some trouble shooting. that car is having serious problems.
Old 06-10-2010, 11:31 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There is something wrong with their dyno. There is nothing wrong with your car.

Here's why: HP = TQ * RPM / 5252

Stock LS1 is rated 310 @ 5200 for hp. So your peak is 5200. Lets say the long tubes etc brought it up to 5400. I'm being generous but making a point. To make 329hp at 5400 rpm, you needed 320 ft/lbs of torque. And your torque peak is not even at 5400, it's a lot closer to the 4000 rpm a stock LS1 makes, where your torque is higher than 320, probably more like 350.

On another note, you don't lose bottom end from long tubes unless they are something ridiculously big for your combo like 2" primaries on a stock motor. A cut out will never lose torque because engines hate back pressure and generally a cutout relieves it (but never adds to it). The less energy spent pumping exhaust gases out, the more energy gets to your rear wheels.

Last edited by Paint_It_Black; 06-10-2010 at 11:43 PM.
Old 06-11-2010, 01:22 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Azrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Paint_It_Black
There is something wrong with their dyno. There is nothing wrong with your car.

Here's why: HP = TQ * RPM / 5252

Stock LS1 is rated 310 @ 5200 for hp. So your peak is 5200. Lets say the long tubes etc brought it up to 5400. I'm being generous but making a point. To make 329hp at 5400 rpm, you needed 320 ft/lbs of torque. And your torque peak is not even at 5400, it's a lot closer to the 4000 rpm a stock LS1 makes, where your torque is higher than 320, probably more like 350.

On another note, you don't lose bottom end from long tubes unless they are something ridiculously big for your combo like 2" primaries on a stock motor. A cut out will never lose torque because engines hate back pressure and generally a cutout relieves it (but never adds to it). The less energy spent pumping exhaust gases out, the more energy gets to your rear wheels.
I tend to agree with Paint it Black, it isn't the car it is something with the way the dyno is computing the torque numbers. It would be impossible to have that low of a torque reading at the RPM a LS1 normally turns at, with that high of a HP rating, since it is a function of specific mathematics formula.
Old 06-11-2010, 02:08 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

how does the car feel on the street? does it struggle or feel fine? if its fine then something is most definetly wrong with the dyno.
Old 06-11-2010, 05:30 AM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
BLK02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: on the dyno tuning in MD
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Definitely a dyno issue...
Old 06-11-2010, 10:48 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

yeah, i got to thinking about it on my way home. Your car should be fine.

I am sorry for the stupid post..
Old 06-11-2010, 12:28 PM
  #8  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Paint_It_Black
There is something wrong with their dyno. There is nothing wrong with your car.

Here's why: HP = TQ * RPM / 5252

Stock LS1 is rated 310 @ 5200 for hp. So your peak is 5200. Lets say the long tubes etc brought it up to 5400. I'm being generous but making a point. To make 329hp at 5400 rpm, you needed 320 ft/lbs of torque. And your torque peak is not even at 5400, it's a lot closer to the 4000 rpm a stock LS1 makes, where your torque is higher than 320, probably more like 350.

On another note, you don't lose bottom end from long tubes unless they are something ridiculously big for your combo like 2" primaries on a stock motor. A cut out will never lose torque because engines hate back pressure and generally a cutout relieves it (but never adds to it). The less energy spent pumping exhaust gases out, the more energy gets to your rear wheels.
This.
Old 06-12-2010, 12:31 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GM PHASST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I knew that I wasn't goin crazy. It feels really good in first gear from about 3-5800k or so. Thanks for all the input. I definitely appreciate it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.