Troubleshooting low power on the dyno
I've spent the last 3 months building this 5.3L 70mm powered setup in my 240SX
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...rbo-build.html
We got a chance to hop on the dyno over the weekend to iron out a tune, and the results where somewhat disappointing. I'm firing up this thread in an attempt to get some fresh ideas on what (if anything) is attributing to "the numbers"
Setup details:
Engine
5.3L LM7 (miles unknown)
LS6 Cam
Katech Rod Bolts
LS9 Headgaskets
ARP Head bolts
Comp 918 Springs
Comp 7.4 pushrods
LS1 Intake w/F-body accessories
Stock ignition on TR6 plugs ~.032 gap
New OEM wires
Drivetrain
T56 w/Monster Stage 3
Fuel System
FAST Rails
S/D 60# Injectors
Aeromotive 340lph in-tank pump
Aeromotive FPR
-6 Feed/Return Lines
Turbo Setup
Self fabricated exhaust/collector piping
On3 Performance 70mm Turbo
3" turbo back exhaust
Tial 44mm Wastegate
HKS BOV
3" core intercooler
3" self fabricated IC piping
I am working on getting the dyno sheets from the shop. As a baseline pull at 8psi on 93 octane, the car only pulled 260whp and mid 300's tq.
After we settled in on a tune at 10psi. The car was happy with ~14 deg of timing and no knock. We're not showing any mis-fires, but I remember the dyno chart being somewhat "wavy" through the powerband. The dyno reported we made 390rwhp/440tq. The AFR was pretty consistent around 11.8's.

I am not sure if I'm simply looking at a dyno thats reading low (Dynojet 210) or if I have a mechanical issue on my hands. I will post the charts when they get emailed to me. The tuner reported some inconsistencies with data collection and that the VE table could not be "smoothed" correctly to make the car happy.
I have yet to do a compression check on the engine, but there was no noticeable smoke to give me an indication of excessive blow-by. The intake system is leak free as well
Here's the video of where the car ended up. You can see it seems pretty "happy"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4aIn6Wci9E
Some things I am thinking about going over are:
Flow test the injectors (I bought them used)
Compression Test
Any idea's are appreciated and if anymore information is needed, I'll do my best to accomodate
Last edited by Booztd 3; Aug 17, 2012 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Attached Dyno Chart
I am not sure if I'm simply looking at a dyno thats reading low (Dynojet 210) or if I have a mechanical issue on my hands. I will post the charts when they get emailed to me. The tuner reported some inconsistencies with data collection and that the VE table could not be "smoothed" correctly to make the car happy.
Also, are you running a MAF?
The car is on SD only
FWIW I have seen/read several people around (and on here) use those head gaskets successfully on a 5.3 setup
Trending Topics
I'm all ears on this one as well, it just acts very strange. If the car ran worse I might think the cam was a tooth off due to the strange VE peak, but the car runs smooth as silk.
I'll try and get you the DRF's tomorrow Andy.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Brand new comp 918 springs.
Brand new Monster Stage 3 clutch (no clutch small on the pulls).
Boost gauge was rock solid at 10psi, and the map sensor agreed.
The car trapped 126mph today, which is pretty close to the power levels we're seeing on the dyno and factoring in the weight of the car.
Whats the turbine wheel size in that 70?
May want to drop that plug gap a tad down to around .026 or so.
Id say its a tuning issue.
I dont have much info on the turbo other than whats on the website
Cold Side:
.70 a/r
4” Inlet and 2.5” Compressor Outlet
Inducer- 70.15mm
Exducer- 94mm
Hot side
A/R - .68
Inducer- 64.5mm
Exducer- Unlisted


