Troubleshooting low power on the dyno
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guys
I've spent the last 3 months building this 5.3L 70mm powered setup in my 240SX
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...rbo-build.html
We got a chance to hop on the dyno over the weekend to iron out a tune, and the results where somewhat disappointing. I'm firing up this thread in an attempt to get some fresh ideas on what (if anything) is attributing to "the numbers"
Setup details:
Engine
5.3L LM7 (miles unknown)
LS6 Cam
Katech Rod Bolts
LS9 Headgaskets
ARP Head bolts
Comp 918 Springs
Comp 7.4 pushrods
LS1 Intake w/F-body accessories
Stock ignition on TR6 plugs ~.032 gap
New OEM wires
Drivetrain
T56 w/Monster Stage 3
Fuel System
FAST Rails
S/D 60# Injectors
Aeromotive 340lph in-tank pump
Aeromotive FPR
-6 Feed/Return Lines
Turbo Setup
Self fabricated exhaust/collector piping
On3 Performance 70mm Turbo
3" turbo back exhaust
Tial 44mm Wastegate
HKS BOV
3" core intercooler
3" self fabricated IC piping
I am working on getting the dyno sheets from the shop. As a baseline pull at 8psi on 93 octane, the car only pulled 260whp and mid 300's tq.
After we settled in on a tune at 10psi. The car was happy with ~14 deg of timing and no knock. We're not showing any mis-fires, but I remember the dyno chart being somewhat "wavy" through the powerband. The dyno reported we made 390rwhp/440tq. The AFR was pretty consistent around 11.8's.
![](http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y96/Booztd3/S13%20LS%20Turbo%20Build/Turbo_LS_240_390HP.jpg)
I am not sure if I'm simply looking at a dyno thats reading low (Dynojet 210) or if I have a mechanical issue on my hands. I will post the charts when they get emailed to me. The tuner reported some inconsistencies with data collection and that the VE table could not be "smoothed" correctly to make the car happy.
I have yet to do a compression check on the engine, but there was no noticeable smoke to give me an indication of excessive blow-by. The intake system is leak free as well
Here's the video of where the car ended up. You can see it seems pretty "happy"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4aIn6Wci9E
Some things I am thinking about going over are:
Flow test the injectors (I bought them used)
Compression Test
Any idea's are appreciated and if anymore information is needed, I'll do my best to accomodate
I've spent the last 3 months building this 5.3L 70mm powered setup in my 240SX
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...rbo-build.html
We got a chance to hop on the dyno over the weekend to iron out a tune, and the results where somewhat disappointing. I'm firing up this thread in an attempt to get some fresh ideas on what (if anything) is attributing to "the numbers"
Setup details:
Engine
5.3L LM7 (miles unknown)
LS6 Cam
Katech Rod Bolts
LS9 Headgaskets
ARP Head bolts
Comp 918 Springs
Comp 7.4 pushrods
LS1 Intake w/F-body accessories
Stock ignition on TR6 plugs ~.032 gap
New OEM wires
Drivetrain
T56 w/Monster Stage 3
Fuel System
FAST Rails
S/D 60# Injectors
Aeromotive 340lph in-tank pump
Aeromotive FPR
-6 Feed/Return Lines
Turbo Setup
Self fabricated exhaust/collector piping
On3 Performance 70mm Turbo
3" turbo back exhaust
Tial 44mm Wastegate
HKS BOV
3" core intercooler
3" self fabricated IC piping
I am working on getting the dyno sheets from the shop. As a baseline pull at 8psi on 93 octane, the car only pulled 260whp and mid 300's tq.
After we settled in on a tune at 10psi. The car was happy with ~14 deg of timing and no knock. We're not showing any mis-fires, but I remember the dyno chart being somewhat "wavy" through the powerband. The dyno reported we made 390rwhp/440tq. The AFR was pretty consistent around 11.8's.
![](http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y96/Booztd3/S13%20LS%20Turbo%20Build/Turbo_LS_240_390HP.jpg)
I am not sure if I'm simply looking at a dyno thats reading low (Dynojet 210) or if I have a mechanical issue on my hands. I will post the charts when they get emailed to me. The tuner reported some inconsistencies with data collection and that the VE table could not be "smoothed" correctly to make the car happy.
I have yet to do a compression check on the engine, but there was no noticeable smoke to give me an indication of excessive blow-by. The intake system is leak free as well
Here's the video of where the car ended up. You can see it seems pretty "happy"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4aIn6Wci9E
Some things I am thinking about going over are:
Flow test the injectors (I bought them used)
Compression Test
Any idea's are appreciated and if anymore information is needed, I'll do my best to accomodate
Last edited by Booztd 3; 08-17-2012 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Attached Dyno Chart
#3
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We're not showing any mis-fires, but I remember the dyno chart being somewhat "wavy" through the powerband. The dyno reported we made 390rwhp/440tq. The AFR was pretty consistent around 11.8's.
I am not sure if I'm simply looking at a dyno thats reading low (Dynojet 210) or if I have a mechanical issue on my hands. I will post the charts when they get emailed to me. The tuner reported some inconsistencies with data collection and that the VE table could not be "smoothed" correctly to make the car happy.
I am not sure if I'm simply looking at a dyno thats reading low (Dynojet 210) or if I have a mechanical issue on my hands. I will post the charts when they get emailed to me. The tuner reported some inconsistencies with data collection and that the VE table could not be "smoothed" correctly to make the car happy.
Also, are you running a MAF?
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The tuner knows what he's doing, and I've tuned a number of high (600+) hp import cars to know that. What I meant by inconsistent data is we could make a back to back pull and in some spots the afr error would be a good ways different - which leads me to a mechanical issue that is irratic. Not to mention, with a good AFR, 14 degrees of timing, and 10psi with my mods - I *should* be making a good amount more power
The car is on SD only
The car is on SD only
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hows your oil look?? Those head gaskets are designed for a motor with a 4.060" bore...not a 5.3L with a 3.78" bore. Not completely sure, but you may have head sealing issues. And for what its worth, my old car with its stock motor blew a head gasket on two cylinders and never ran hot...just a bunch of coolant in the oil.
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have yet to change it since assembling the engine, as it probably only has 300-400 miles on it or so. The last time I checked the dipstick I didnt see anything out of the ordinary.
FWIW I have seen/read several people around (and on here) use those head gaskets successfully on a 5.3 setup
FWIW I have seen/read several people around (and on here) use those head gaskets successfully on a 5.3 setup
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm the tuner that was working on this car. For some background, I'm not going to claim to be the best troubleshooter or tuner in the world, but I've been doing this for quite some time and I've got a pretty good knowledge base.
This car is running OLSD on a 2bar OS. To hit the target AF ratios, the VE numbers on this thing are very funky. As in 70+ values just off idle, and around 2500rpm in low boost regions it is wanting values higher than in the 4800 region. I double checked the scalers in the tune to make sure they weren't set up for a 4.8 or something, but they're all right. This car also peaked in power very early. It has an LS6 cam and it was declining in power by 5700rpm if I recall correctly.
I'm all ears on this one as well, it just acts very strange. If the car ran worse I might think the cam was a tooth off due to the strange VE peak, but the car runs smooth as silk.
I'll try and get you the DRF's tomorrow Andy.
I'm all ears on this one as well, it just acts very strange. If the car ran worse I might think the cam was a tooth off due to the strange VE peak, but the car runs smooth as silk.
I'll try and get you the DRF's tomorrow Andy.
#12
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea I agree it looks like its about to make some nice power then just falls off. Since the a/f and timing seem to be in line id start looking at restrictions. Id start with that ls1 intake, I doubt it fixes the huge drop off but it needs to be done anyway. Are the valvesprings new?
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'll answer the last couple questions since I asked them the other day.
Brand new comp 918 springs.
Brand new Monster Stage 3 clutch (no clutch small on the pulls).
Boost gauge was rock solid at 10psi, and the map sensor agreed.
Brand new comp 918 springs.
Brand new Monster Stage 3 clutch (no clutch small on the pulls).
Boost gauge was rock solid at 10psi, and the map sensor agreed.
#16
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea I agree it looks like its about to make some nice power then just falls off. Since the a/f and timing seem to be in line id start looking at restrictions. Id start with that ls1 intake, I doubt it fixes the huge drop off but it needs to be done anyway. Are the valvesprings new?
The car trapped 126mph today, which is pretty close to the power levels we're seeing on the dyno and factoring in the weight of the car.
#18
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We had a little discussion while on the dyno about ignition. It was dismissed due to the fact we were not seeing any misfires. I'm not familiar of the mis-fire detection strategy but on other applications I've played with I'll usually get an audible mis-fire.
I dont have much info on the turbo other than whats on the website
Cold Side:
.70 a/r
4” Inlet and 2.5” Compressor Outlet
Inducer- 70.15mm
Exducer- 94mm
Hot side
A/R - .68
Inducer- 64.5mm
Exducer- Unlisted
I dont have much info on the turbo other than whats on the website
Cold Side:
.70 a/r
4” Inlet and 2.5” Compressor Outlet
Inducer- 70.15mm
Exducer- 94mm
Hot side
A/R - .68
Inducer- 64.5mm
Exducer- Unlisted