Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

c5z headers & intake dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2017, 02:12 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Z06zak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default c5z headers & intake dyno results

Had my car tuned last week after getting the long tubes and the intake installed. Overall I'm very happy with the numbers considering the conditions and the conservative tune, the car feels and sounds amazing. Shout out to Powertech Performance in St. Pete. If any of you guys are in the Pinellas/St. Pete/Tampa area I highly recommend you check them out. Joe (owner & tuner) is an awesome guy and the LS platform is his expertise. He walked me through the tune while it was on the dyno and explained what changes he was making as he went along.

Car: 04 c5 z06, 40k miles

Mods: American Racing 1 3/4" long tubes, off-road x-pipe no cats connected to stock Ti axle-backs. Vararam B2 intake w/ power duct.

Conditions: 92F outside/114F in dyno room, 85% humidity, approx 15ft above sea level.

Stock Baseline: 351hp & 329tq

Final Pull: 388hp & 370tq at only 20 degrees of timing.
Attached Thumbnails c5z headers & intake dyno results-dyno-graph.jpg  
Old 07-31-2017, 02:21 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Looks good man!
Old 07-31-2017, 02:41 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Z06zak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Looks good man!
Thanks!
Old 07-31-2017, 04:47 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Just curious why they left the timing that low unless your particular car showed no gains with a more normal amount (23-28*)?
Old 07-31-2017, 08:02 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 198
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

20 degrees is really low. To low
Old 07-31-2017, 08:26 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,602
Received 1,747 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

Ls6 engines are more efficient and don't need as much timing. I believe Scottysc5 was the same deal.
Old 07-31-2017, 08:52 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Curious why you went with 1 3/4 and not the 1 7/8? Is there space constraints?
Old 08-01-2017, 07:57 AM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Z06zak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Just curious why they left the timing that low unless your particular car showed no gains with a more normal amount (23-28*)?
I asked him the same thing, I was a little surprised by how low he kept the timing too but the more timing he added the more knock he would start to see. Very minimal knock but still knock. He said the heat and humidity was really holding him back from squeezing the last few degrees of timing out. We agreed to leave it conservative because it is my daily driver.
Old 08-01-2017, 08:11 AM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Z06zak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZNix
Curious why you went with 1 3/4 and not the 1 7/8? Is there space constraints?
I just felt the 1 3/4" was better suited for a stock 346ci daily driving in the city. I might have picked up a couple peak hp with 1 7/8" but I didn't want to sacrifice any mid range torque so I played it safe.
Old 08-01-2017, 10:09 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

That's strange. Even in dead of summer I've been able to get 27.5* out of my LS1 with LS6 heads and now the LS2 which has even more compression (approx 11.2:1).

That humidity is pretty insane though.

Either way, good numbers.
Old 08-01-2017, 12:04 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Z06zak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
That's strange. Even in dead of summer I've been able to get 27.5* out of my LS1 with LS6 heads and now the LS2 which has even more compression (approx 11.2:1).

That humidity is pretty insane though.

Either way, good numbers.
Yeah it is a little unusual that we couldn't go past 20 degrees without seeing some knock. Most likely some combination of variables like heat/humidity, heat soak, bad gas, blow-bye in intake (I don't have a catch can yet and he mentioned that the intake manifold was very dirty) etc... who knows.
Old 08-01-2017, 01:54 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z06zak
......I might have picked up a couple peak hp with 1 7/8" but I didn't want to sacrifice any mid range torque so I played it safe.
I would pretty much guarantee that if you went to 1 7/8" headers, you'd gain HP.....and.....torque throughout the entire RPM range.

'Back pressure' be damned.

Jus' sayin'.....

KW
Old 08-01-2017, 02:05 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

A buddy of mine just switched from 1 3/4" to 1 7/8" headers (both Speed Engineering as well) and picked up exactly 5 rwhp. It was the same dyno before and after. He has a heads and cam LS1 to boot.
Old 08-01-2017, 02:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,253
Received 3,165 Likes on 2,471 Posts
Default

5HP from 1 7/8" headers over 1 3/4"; a gain, yes. Cost effective, no.
Old 08-01-2017, 03:00 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
5HP from 1 7/8" headers over 1 3/4"; a gain, yes. Cost effective, no.
Exactly!
Old 08-01-2017, 03:30 PM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Z06zak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
A buddy of mine just switched from 1 3/4" to 1 7/8" headers (both Speed Engineering as well) and picked up exactly 5 rwhp. It was the same dyno before and after. He has a heads and cam LS1 to boot.
How did the curves compare? Everyone but my tuner seems to recommend 1 7/8" but I have yet to see a good back to back comparison. I find it hard to believe that going up in primary size will have zero effect on the low/mid range and will only extend peak torque to gain a couple hp. Either way the difference is not nearly significant enough to make the switch.
Old 08-01-2017, 03:48 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z06zak
How did the curves compare? Everyone but my tuner seems to recommend 1 7/8" but I have yet to see a good back to back comparison. I find it hard to believe that going up in primary size will have zero effect on the low/mid range and will only extend peak torque to gain a couple hp. Either way the difference is not nearly significant enough to make the switch.
I don't remember exactly to be honest. I wanna say he said they were pretty much the same all the way through, or the bigger headers started gaining after 3500 rpm. I'll have to ask
Old 08-02-2017, 11:27 AM
  #18  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
ironmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Export, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
I don't remember exactly to be honest. I wanna say he said they were pretty much the same all the way through, or the bigger headers started gaining after 3500 rpm. I'll have to ask
I was going to ask a similar question. We always look at peak HP for comparison sake, but in reality acceleration happens under the curve.
Old 08-03-2017, 11:11 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

The 1 7/8 headers would have been the better choice imo. I think they would pick up everywhere on the LS6.
Old 08-03-2017, 11:29 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
5HP from 1 7/8" headers over 1 3/4"; a gain, yes. Cost effective, no.
1. Gains will depend on the setup...... ;

2. Sell the old headers to defray the cost of the new headers;

3. For you next build......just go big!

KW


Quick Reply: c5z headers & intake dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.