Finally Dynoed
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tulsa and Claremore, OK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finally Dynoed
I know numbers off the track don't mean much to some, but I just like knowing what I've got coming out. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Uncorrected numbers were 356rwhp and 368rwtq. SAE (1.03 Correction Factor for the day) figures come out to 366rwhp and 379rwtq <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
This is on a 02 M6 WS6 with lid, filter, stock ported MAF, smooth bellows, TR55's, MAC's, ORP, Bullet, and an open cutout. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
I'm very very pleased with the figures as I was only expecting about 340rwhp.
Uncorrected numbers were 356rwhp and 368rwtq. SAE (1.03 Correction Factor for the day) figures come out to 366rwhp and 379rwtq <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
This is on a 02 M6 WS6 with lid, filter, stock ported MAF, smooth bellows, TR55's, MAC's, ORP, Bullet, and an open cutout. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
I'm very very pleased with the figures as I was only expecting about 340rwhp.
#2
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,372
Likes: 0
Received 1,803 Likes
on
1,284 Posts
Re: Finally Dynoed
Those are some very good dyno numbers considering your mods! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
You should be very pleased <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
You should be very pleased <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tulsa and Claremore, OK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Finally Dynoed
I'm more then pleased with them. Much more then I was expecting but it does make my driving skills look bad since I'm still stuck in the 13's trapping 111... haha
#4
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Finally Dynoed
I could be wrong but I believe you've got your results(#'s) mixed up. The uncorrected #'s are always higher than the SAE corrected version #'s. I've never seen a dynojet reading that showed higher #'s SAE against uncorrected. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> Check your sheet again to make sure you read it right.
Either way though, nice job! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
Mike
Either way though, nice job! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
Mike
#5
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tulsa and Claremore, OK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Finally Dynoed
SAE is an agreed upon "ideal conditions" to make comparisons to. It's something like 77 degree day, 0 humidity, and blah blah blah... the conditions when I dynoed delegated a 1.03 correction factor... so, unless I'm doing this backwards (as well as everyone I've asked about it) then I multiply my STD numbers by 1.03... am I wrong on that part? Do I divide it by 1.03?
Trending Topics
#8
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Florida # of drag strips runs: ?!?!?
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Finally Dynoed
those are some kick-*** numbers. I hope to get 360 rwhp out of my nova when my local speed shop get its new dyno. <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />