L92 408 first results....

Rick

Rick
Woulnd't chase after this with a tighter LSa. those heads move to much air for a tight LSA/high overlap camshaft on an engine this size. I would add a few degrees of intake lobe and pull the advance out of the camshaft.
Look like a good first stab though.
99 f-body.
iron 408
11.5 CR
L92 heads, touched up exhaust.
L76 intake with UMI 90mm TB.
American Racing 1 7/8th long tubes with no cats.
Corsa catback with extra magnaflow muffler in the I-pipe for sound reasons.
42lb injectors
Ford 9inch
3.5" driveshaft.
6-speed car.
Mcloud twin disc.
This should cover most of what you need.
I am going to give out cam specs today to help other understand how simple and tame this combo is.
Cam specs. 230/242 116+2 LSA .590/.578
Customers goals where simple, TQ all the time, and fun to drive. I will admit, I wanted more powerband, but thats the great thing about trial and error, so the next cam will fit the bill even more. Enjoy.

Rick
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

Dont worry, I didnt know your age nor was I trying to down on you. Just letting you know, that not every cam works the same for every head.

I would say more like 248/256 to start i you want something nasty. But I still dont like nasty cams anways.
Rick
Woulnd't chase after this with a tighter LSa. those heads move to much air for a tight LSA/high overlap camshaft on an engine this size. I would add a few degrees of intake lobe and pull the advance out of the camshaft.
Look like a good first stab though.
Already doing that on the next one. The LSA is not changing much, but I am taking out the ground in advance. I basicly ended up with a 236/246 on a 115 for the one I just ordered. 
Rick
Already doing that on the next one. The LSA is not changing much, but I am taking out the ground in advance. I basicly ended up with a 236/246 on a 115 for the one I just ordered. 
Rick
yup, and keep in mind the customer wants to sacrifice almost nothing from the current cam.
gonna keep me on my feet with this one. Rick
gonna keep me on my feet with this one. Rick
according to some XER lobes are not the way to go with the weight of the stock intake valve. no need for them. who needs this sort of ramping rate on a 2.16 valve?? it gets enough air due to the size... maybe on a car with shrouding issues like a 4.030 bore... if ya have a 4.060 bore those lobes are not necessary. We need aftermarket valves to make XER's good for these heads..... but this is just bench racing and bench guessin IMHO.
Are those numbers comparable to a RWHP/RWTQ from a dynojet? I only ask because the graph reads flywheel power at the top. Wasn't sure if that software is adding back in some sort of "power loss across the drivetrain" factor or something. If not, that's some respectable numbers. ****, I don't think that I have seen a 40x LSx motor put down more tq than hp before through an M6. Specially not one that is right at about the 500 numbers. Kudos to you for sharing. I can't wait to see what happens after the cam swap. Not to mention that if I read the first post correctly, there is a muffler upstream of the rear muffler/mufflers. How does it sound? I have been considering a similar method of quiting down my car. Does it create an additional restriction or is the restriction just at the first muffler and therefore it doesn't matter how many you put downstream?
Thanks!






