Bad heads? Tr230 results
08-28-2007, 11:53 AM
#21
Originally Posted by 1MEANGTO
So why don't I like reverse splits I'd say the truth is in the track times. I have slips to back this all up. And I have dyno sheets. My car even with the ms3 never had a loss of power or torque when the two graphs we're on top of each other At any RPM
Bruce
08-28-2007, 05:30 PM
#22
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.MartyStone
Reverse splits are junk...and the 98 head rumor isn't that true. I went 418/395 cam only with great under the curve power with "junk" 98 heads. If you look at the setup as a whole then you can get good results. Dump the junky *** reverse split cam.
Marty
Marty
08-28-2007, 11:52 PM
#24
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: minneapolis,mn
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
1meanGTO -It's obvious the tune on the reverse split was garbage.Thats why the car ran so bad at the track. You wouldn't gain that much on that swap if the tunes were right.
Now,all cars are different.I really hate 98's and never seen one hit over 390rwhp Cam only on our dyno -never!! This is even with the big,bad *** cams.So thats just us.
It's obvious the heads are no good.The home porting probly killed them.
Now,all cars are different.I really hate 98's and never seen one hit over 390rwhp Cam only on our dyno -never!! This is even with the big,bad *** cams.So thats just us.
It's obvious the heads are no good.The home porting probly killed them.
I have offered luke a set of 241's but he says he's gonna wait now until he can afford a new set of 5.3 heads from tsp and a standard split cam maybe a ms3. I just finished a car today with a 228r and tsp 5.3 stage 2.5's luke seemed pretty impressed as he gave me a hand with the car.
And also slowhawk there are no good tuners around here thats why I started tuning myself from what I've learned just from my own cars. I do alright business so far I'm looking forward to expanding in the future. But as with everything everyday you learn a little more.
08-29-2007, 12:37 AM
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm only 10rwhp behind you and 6rwtq more than you.
I only have just boltons (not even all of them). I'd look into other issues not just the heads. There not as bad as people think.
Good luck!
I only have just boltons (not even all of them). I'd look into other issues not just the heads. There not as bad as people think.
Good luck!
08-29-2007, 10:19 AM
#27
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1MEANGTO
.
I have offered luke a set of 241's but he says he's gonna wait now until he can afford a new set of 5.3 heads from tsp and a standard split cam maybe a ms3.
I have offered luke a set of 241's but he says he's gonna wait now until he can afford a new set of 5.3 heads from tsp and a standard split cam maybe a ms3.
I want to see the difference in hp. Then I will go with a standard split like Mike said.
09-01-2007, 09:22 AM
#28
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Troy, MO
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've learned you really can't compare dyno numbers....our mustang dyno at school is the lowest reading dyno i've ever seen. On a 402 Z28 our dyno read 380 LOL, on someone elses it put down 460, on a ported blower 03 cobra ours = 390, someone elses was 480rwhp or something, in a friends H/C/I 5.0, our dyno read 237, somewhere else was like 290...
Just find someone with a similar set-up and race. I don't give a **** what my car puts down, as long as i'm ahead of cars with similar set-ups.
Just find someone with a similar set-up and race. I don't give a **** what my car puts down, as long as i'm ahead of cars with similar set-ups.
09-04-2007, 08:31 AM
#30
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: minneapolis,mn
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2 SSlow
I've learned you really can't compare dyno numbers....our mustang dyno at school is the lowest reading dyno i've ever seen. On a 402 Z28 our dyno read 380 LOL, on someone elses it put down 460, on a ported blower 03 cobra ours = 390, someone elses was 480rwhp or something, in a friends H/C/I 5.0, our dyno read 237, somewhere else was like 290...
Just find someone with a similar set-up and race. I don't give a **** what my car puts down, as long as i'm ahead of cars with similar set-ups.
Just find someone with a similar set-up and race. I don't give a **** what my car puts down, as long as i'm ahead of cars with similar set-ups.
09-04-2007, 06:09 PM
#31
Originally Posted by gillbot
Dude, you are seriously misinformed. See sig for numbers from a TR230 cam and BONE STOCK heads with "crappy" MAC headers.
My car ran a lot harder than that with stock heads and junk flowtech headers when I was cam only...try again.Marty
09-09-2007, 07:28 PM
#34
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Palestine, OH - USA
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.MartyStone
My car ran a lot harder than that with stock heads and junk flowtech headers when I was cam only...try again.Marty
You badmouth a cam that repeatedly makes in the range of 400RWHP yet you can do better without it? Hardly.
09-10-2007, 06:22 PM
#36
I agree with Mr.MartyStone, the TR230 is a piece of crap. I only ran a best et of 11.2 and best mph of 123.5 on stock 241 heads @3500lbs with that cam. I hated it so much I put it in my stock LS6 motor to try for 10s. Also, f*3k a dyno, I made 413rwhp running those times. Dynos are great for tuning and gauging your own advancement, but racing dyno numbers is futile. Take it to the track.
Also, f*3k a dyno, I made 413rwhp running those times. Dynos are great for tuning and gauging your own advancement, but racing dyno numbers is futile. Take it to the track. 