LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Dynamometer Results & Comparisons (https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons-65/)
-   -   TSP 06 Z06 Heads Cam Dyno Results!! PRC LS7 Heads!! (https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/878259-tsp-06-z06-heads-cam-dyno-results-prc-ls7-heads.html)

Abdullah 05-10-2009 09:23 PM


Originally Posted by -Joseph- (Post 11572708)
If Darton sleeves the block, all LS2/LS7 Gen IV blocks end up really close to being the same thing as the final usable product. Gen IV blocks can be wet or dry sleeved with good results, with dry sleeves being a tad more economical than the MID darton sleeves. The Darton dry sleeves are stronger than the factory LS7 sleeves which are prone to cracking if not careful. The MID sleeves are the strongest option for sleeved aluminum blocks. Talk to Steve at Race Engine Development for the best sleeve work.

btw, if i use a MID resleeved LS1 block will it be as strong as LS2/LS3/LS7 blocks?

will that MID resleeved LS1 block be able to handle forced induction without failure or leaking coolant?

thanks.

venom ws7 05-11-2009 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by David Gordon (Post 11573356)
Joseph you didnt answer my question? How much power in a small street cam?


Friend of mine got the setup above WITH Stock Catback, stock Intake and stock TB the car drive really close to stock and pulls hard

Made 560rwhp 505rwtq you can go with this setup with ported Intake and tb or the new FAST 102mm I;m sure 580rwhp shouldnt be a problem.

Haans249 05-11-2009 08:17 PM


Originally Posted by Jon@Texas-Speed (Post 8875883)
We just finished installing a ported ls7 intake on our shop z06 & she's really starting to show her potential! Car made just under 600rwhp before the ported intake & throttle body!

Here's the mods:

PRC CNC Ported LS7 Heads
TSP Ported TB & LS7 Intake
Kooks 1 7/8" Headers
TSP LS7 Camshaft
Killer Bee Intake
TSP Dyno Tuning!!

http://precisionracecomponents.com/tspz06.jpg

Awesome power!!! What injectors are you using? What injector duty cycle did you see?

-Joseph- 05-11-2009 11:50 PM


Originally Posted by Abdullah (Post 11575875)
btw, if i use a MID resleeved LS1 block will it be as strong as LS2/LS3/LS7 blocks?

will that MID resleeved LS1 block be able to handle forced induction without failure or leaking coolant?

thanks.

I think if you are comparing MID LS1 to MID Gen IV engines they are probably very comparable for most people. Steve @ RED told me that he prefers to use the LS1 (not LS6) blocks due to rigidity; LS6 and -most- Gen IV blocks have bay-to-bay breathing windows that would take a little structure support away. He would be the best person to discuss the advantages of either and point you in the best direction. ;)

-Joseph- 05-11-2009 11:55 PM


Originally Posted by Haans249 (Post 11581523)
Awesome power!!! What injectors are you using? What injector duty cycle did you see?

Stock LS7 injectors, but with our altitude we can usually stretch injector capacity a little more than guys at sea level. Jason might remember the duty cycle, any data logs were probably lost long ago due to computer upgrades, HD failures, etc... but I'm sure it's very high!

David Gordon 05-12-2009 05:45 AM

Joseph, I was told once you port the stock throttlebody and intake the car is never the same. It causes surging and iratic idle. Is this true?

Stang's Bane 05-12-2009 06:10 AM


Originally Posted by David Gordon (Post 11583523)
Joseph, I was told once you port the stock throttlebody and intake the car is never the same. It causes surging and iratic idle. Is this true?

I can answer this. That is absolutely not true.

-Joseph- 05-12-2009 09:19 AM


Originally Posted by Stang's Bane (Post 11583560)
I can answer this. That is absolutely not true.

I agree, I always install the ported TBs/intakes with a tune anyway. Never had any complaints. The C5's with LS2+ TB's sometimes act querky with bigger cams, etc... but anything that comes OEM with the newer TB's seems to do just fine that I've seen.

JakeFusion 05-15-2009 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA (Post 11548188)
Guys we're going to start working on the 454 lsx short-block to replace this one! I'll keep ya posted!!

4.250" Stroke?

Abdullah 05-15-2009 02:53 PM


Originally Posted by JakeFusion™ (Post 11603005)
4.250" Stroke?

i think it will be 4.185" bore X 4.125" stroke which will yield 454ci.

JakeFusion 05-15-2009 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by Abdullah (Post 11603814)
i think it will be 4.185" bore X 4.125" stroke which will yield 454ci.

Not in an LS7 block. Other vendors are doing 454s with the LS7 using 4.250" stroke. The sleeve length on the LS7 is long enough to support such a long stroke.

Sorry, I had quoted the wrong thing earlier. This is what I meant to ask 4.250" stroke for:


Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA (Post 11559646)
We're working on a LS7 block 454 for it :) Gonna stay aluminum for the Z :)


raptorws6 05-19-2009 09:18 AM

Very nice results.

Jason 98 TA 07-15-2009 08:45 AM

bump we're currently running LS7s on the cnc machine in case anyone needs a set! :) :)

venom ws7 07-15-2009 08:04 PM


Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA (Post 11911344)
bump we're currently running LS7s on the cnc machine in case anyone needs a set! :) :)



Just bought one for a friend. :D

I'll post some numbers very soon. :chug:

airforcemanss 07-15-2009 09:52 PM

i wish we could see a ported lsxr intake/tb combo on this

airforcemanss 08-09-2009 03:15 PM

so do you think strokin the ls7 to a 440 would help with drivablility issues with this cam? also, what results do you think you could see with the new fast combo and the 440 with this cam?

on a side note, do you think you spray a 100 shot on top of this setup but with a 440?

just getting some ideas...

Austin@HPE 08-10-2009 01:17 PM

Aren't horse power and torque supposed to cross at 5252. If not then its not an accurate horsepower number. (Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower

Sales2@Texas-speed 08-10-2009 04:56 PM


Originally Posted by gogto (Post 12049019)
Aren't horse power and torque supposed to cross at 5252. If not then its not an accurate horsepower number. (Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower

They would if the scaling on the sides of he graph were equal. Notice they are different though.

airforcemanss 08-10-2009 05:20 PM

can you you put some input in from my post please:drive:

9secondsflat 08-11-2009 05:50 AM

track times????


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands