Does this dyno number suck?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 31, 2008 | 10:25 PM

#21

warior5458

Thread Starter

Teching In

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 46

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK02WS6

Don't change the MAF back to stock if it was tuned with the SLP - that will change the AFR! If you are going to change it back, you need to have it retuned with the stock one...

I'll keep the SLP on then. How about when I get a head and cam package....should i throw the stock one back on then get it tuned again?

Jul 31, 2008 | 10:30 PM

#22

warior5458

Thread Starter

Teching In

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 46

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by PewterScreaminMach

Those look dead on to me. Congrats.

Thanks!!

Aug 1, 2008 | 05:40 AM

#23

BLK02WS6

9 Second Club

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 2,583

Likes: 1

From: on the dyno tuning in MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by warior5458

I'll keep the SLP on then. How about when I get a head and cam package....should i throw the stock one back on then get it tuned again?

I would just leave it on now... but if you do change it, make sure you do it at the tuners so it won't run much with the changed MAF - I have seen 15% difference in the fueling between stock and aftermarket MAFs...

Aug 9, 2008 | 01:37 AM

#24

warior5458

Thread Starter

Teching In

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 46

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by 69_YENKO

those numbers look about right for a bolt-on car with cats.

How much horsepower am I losing by keeping the high flow cats on?

Aug 9, 2008 | 01:44 AM

#25

jsteele90

11 Second Club

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 2,870

Likes: 2

From: delaware

my numbers seemed low too. but dyno #s dont mean **** at the track! im sure mine would dyno about 20 hp more with the cutout open. that flowmaster is killing me

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 2
Next
Last