Giants suck.
12-07-2006, 05:34 PM
#41
Launching!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how BOUT THEM COWBOYS!!! We waited ten years for this so called ROMO guy!!! Who knew! THe hillarious thing is watching all these teams putting in their second string qb paraying for a Tony Romo
12-07-2006, 05:38 PM
#42
Launching!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PA Z06
The nfc just plain sucks this year
GO BIRDS
GO BIRDS
12-07-2006, 07:50 PM
#44
Originally Posted by stangeater99
ahahahaahhahahahah Every one in The NFC suck with the exeption of the BIG BAD DALLAS COWBOYS!!! ILOVE ALL THESE HATERS EATING THEIR WORDS!!! Hate all you want but the cowboys beat both "superbowl" favorites off the experts the Pathers and the colts... 'IS THERE NO ONE ELSE"!!??!!
12-07-2006, 09:41 PM
#45
Originally Posted by NHRATA01
Yeah, they're called the Bears.
hate to tell you but the Cowgirls will self destruct. all is well in la la land right now but you wait and see. Cowgirls wont get out of the first round and even if they did...no one is beating the Bears in the NFC...im sorry but Defense wins championships...just ask all the Steelers fans.
12-08-2006, 05:26 AM
#46
Originally Posted by stangeater99
ahahahaahhahahahah Every one in The NFC suck with the exeption of the BIG BAD DALLAS COWBOYS!!! ILOVE ALL THESE HATERS EATING THEIR WORDS!!! Hate all you want but the cowboys beat both "superbowl" favorites off the experts the Pathers and the colts... 'IS THERE NO ONE ELSE"!!??!!
12-08-2006, 07:12 AM
#47
the Bears are for real....only team i know that their starting QB throws more interceptions in a game than completions to his own receivers..has a rating of 20 something...throws for for only 35 total yards and they still managed to win the game. not to mention..the NFC goes through soldier field...NOT somewhere ya wanna be playin when its 15 degrees and snowing.
12-08-2006, 09:00 AM
#48
Originally Posted by TNTramair
the Bears are for real....only team i know that their starting QB throws more interceptions in a game than completions to his own receivers..has a rating of 20 something...throws for for only 35 total yards and they still managed to win the game. .
12-08-2006, 10:48 AM
#52
Originally Posted by TXZ28LS1
hey didnt the bears exit the playoffs the first game after coming off the bye week in the playoffs..lol yeah the bears have a bad a$$ defense, but havent they exited the playoffs the first game cuz the offense sucked? lol..
12-08-2006, 03:23 PM
#53
Originally Posted by 11 Bravo
That's not going to cut it in the post season. They would have to actually score to beat America's Team. You know you have a horrible offense when you're 10-2 and have a quaterback controversy.
The 'Boys are just not that solid of a team, sorry. The Giants are in sad shape now, and they did almost beat the Cowboys.
I know they're playing decent for the first time since Aikman retired, but its amusing to see all the Cowboys fans think they own the NFL now because they have a winning record.
12-08-2006, 03:34 PM
#54
Originally Posted by NHRATA01
It worked just fine for the Ravens back in '00.
The 'Boys are just not that solid of a team, sorry. The Giants are in sad shape now, and they did almost beat the Cowboys.
I know they're playing decent for the first time since Aikman retired, but its amusing to see all the Cowboys fans think they own the NFL now because they have a winning record.
The 'Boys are just not that solid of a team, sorry. The Giants are in sad shape now, and they did almost beat the Cowboys.
I know they're playing decent for the first time since Aikman retired, but its amusing to see all the Cowboys fans think they own the NFL now because they have a winning record.
how is the cowboys not solid? they rank 3rd in defense behind only the ravens and bears? the giants barely beat the cowboys where romo didnt even play that well? other than the bears on defense the cowboys are better than the other nfc playoff bound teams? the cowboys are good on both sides of the ball. not just on defense or just offense. they are in better shape in both sides of the ball.
12-08-2006, 04:59 PM
#55
Originally Posted by TXZ28LS1
how is the cowboys not solid? they rank 3rd in defense behind only the ravens and bears? the giants barely beat the cowboys where romo didnt even play that well? other than the bears on defense the cowboys are better than the other nfc playoff bound teams? the cowboys are good on both sides of the ball. not just on defense or just offense. they are in better shape in both sides of the ball.
they are decent on both sides of the ball....but the playoffs are a totally differant season. Romo might not be able to withstand the pressure and he will cave...its all a matter of time. the only decent defensive team they've played since Romo took over was the Giants and they didnt have anyone on defense. next few weeks will be interesting cause as bad as the Eagles are, they allways play the boys tough...lets see what happens.
12-08-2006, 08:14 PM
#56
Originally Posted by TXZ28LS1
how is the cowboys not solid? they rank 3rd in defense behind only the ravens and bears? the giants barely beat the cowboys where romo didnt even play that well? other than the bears on defense the cowboys are better than the other nfc playoff bound teams? the cowboys are good on both sides of the ball. not just on defense or just offense. they are in better shape in both sides of the ball.
There's 4 teams in the AFC that are a better shot at winning the SB (regardless of upsetting the Colts), the Bears are easily the cream of the NFC, and if healthy Seattle is probably the clear #2. They knock off the Saints this week and look good, I'll concede they'd be #3 in the NFC. But since the whipping in the first meeting against the Jints, the Colts are the only team of note they've beaten, and they dropped one to a bad 'Skins team.
12-08-2006, 08:28 PM
#57
Originally Posted by NHRATA01
Well lets see, aside from the unknown that is TO, the O-Line is porous, the pass defense didn't look too well considering they were playing a team with only 2 legitimate passing targets (and shockey being on a bum foot) and a QB coming off 6 weeks of throwing for under 200 yards, and the runningback-by-comittee never works out. Jones is a great talent, but he's very inconsistent. And noobie QB's are always a question mark, there's not alot of Rothlisbergers out there, and alot more Browning Nagles.
There's 4 teams in the AFC that are a better shot at winning the SB (regardless of upsetting the Colts), the Bears are easily the cream of the NFC, and if healthy Seattle is probably the clear #2. They knock off the Saints this week and look good, I'll concede they'd be #3 in the NFC. But since the whipping in the first meeting against the Jints, the Colts are the only team of note they've beaten, and they dropped one to a bad 'Skins team.
There's 4 teams in the AFC that are a better shot at winning the SB (regardless of upsetting the Colts), the Bears are easily the cream of the NFC, and if healthy Seattle is probably the clear #2. They knock off the Saints this week and look good, I'll concede they'd be #3 in the NFC. But since the whipping in the first meeting against the Jints, the Colts are the only team of note they've beaten, and they dropped one to a bad 'Skins team.
i agree 100% with the Giants fan..... 
12-08-2006, 09:58 PM
#59
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nokeman
Are there no damn Skins fans in here?!?! That sucks...actually the redskins suck too but I was born with the disease of being a die-hard skinds fan through the thick and the thin. I think they are possibly the hardest team to watch because they have so much talent in every aspect an they still cant F-ing win!!
Im prepared for the bashing so go ahead
Im prepared for the bashing so go ahead
