Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

single GT35R?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2009, 03:28 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default single GT35R?

another turbo fitment question:

I am looking to turbocharge a stock 2002 LS1, my question is would a single GT3582R ball bearing turbo with a Tial 1.03 a/r turbine housing be too small for my motor? I plan on running no more than 8psi with this turbo, and I am looking to make between 500-550 whp.

The reason for choosing a small turbo is to minimize lag as much as I possibly can, plus I can get a deal on this turbo. What do you guys think? Is it possible?

Thanks guys,
-John
Old 04-13-2009, 04:11 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Super Slow SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenville, Raleigh NC
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

front mount? I assume yes because you will have to run coolant lines to that turbo, I think it is a little small, and i think you would better benefit from a smaller ar and larger turbo if you are most concerned with spool time. Just my first idea, although I think the turbo will get you to your HP goal.
Old 04-13-2009, 04:15 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes, it will be a front mount... it is going into a 93' rx7 with an LS1 swap, and thanks for the input!
Old 04-13-2009, 04:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Super Slow SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenville, Raleigh NC
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thumpstick
yes, it will be a front mount... it is going into a 93' rx7 with an LS1 swap, and thanks for the input!
Off topic, but what happened to the wankel?

Ohh and this is what your really looking for: http://www.projectrpm.com/nelsonraci...600hp_RX7.html

Last edited by Super Slow SS; 04-13-2009 at 04:34 PM.
Old 04-13-2009, 04:45 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I blew a few of them up... turns out they work great in theory... but as soon as you start with the power adders they go to sh#$. Anyway, I couldn't bring myself to sell the car, it is just too sexy so I looked into the LS1/T56 swap and I was sold.

before:


after:
Old 04-13-2009, 05:35 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Super Slow SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenville, Raleigh NC
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just Sexy
Old 04-13-2009, 06:39 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

haha, thanks
Old 04-13-2009, 07:02 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
 
sultan(ZR-1)KSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if you are planning to do trakctor pulls i think it is a good choice other wise go for a beger turbo atleats a gt40
Old 04-13-2009, 07:28 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Possible but not optimal, I would put the largest exhaust a/r on it that you could.
Old 04-13-2009, 07:41 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The 1.03 is the biggest turbine that I can find for the gt35... do you think that will be enough? I know it is not the most efficient, but I am willing to give up some top end for spool time. I feel that the gt35 will be more than capable of reaching my power goals, I just want to make sure that it can do so a reasonable boost level (8psi or so).

thanks again for the input guys!
-John
Old 04-13-2009, 09:17 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
z28adiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know they make the 35r in a 1.06 as i plan to run 2 of them. And if you want to make that kind of power with that amount of boost, people seem to have good luck with the T76 turbos. I know 35rs love boost and love to be spun to make there power. i know its only on a 2.4 liter but look at the evo guys they spin them to over 30 pounds but make great power. and a stock ls1 will not like high boost at all. Im not saying that a 35r wont reach your goals under that boost level, bc most guys dont take that route bc they can run a nice 76mm for less money than a 35r and have been proven to make 500 to 550 easy to the wheels especially through a stick car at the boost level you are looking to run.

Last edited by z28adiction; 04-13-2009 at 09:37 PM.
Old 04-13-2009, 09:28 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
 
nuclearxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think a GT35 is awfully small. Even with a 1.06 A/R you'll be pushing that turbo awfully hard, even at 8 psi. If you're not going intercooled (which i think you are), otherwise forget about it.
Old 04-13-2009, 09:32 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nuclearxp
I think a GT35 is awfully small. Even with a 1.06 A/R you'll be pushing that turbo awfully hard, even at 8 psi. If you're not going intercooled (which i think you are), otherwise forget about it.
I will definitely be using an intercooler. I will be using a large bar and plate front mount with a 2.5 in inlet, and a 3 in outlet.
Old 04-13-2009, 09:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Too small. That's a 61 mm turbo. Most folks say a 76 mm is too small for the ls1. Plot it on the compressor map and you'd see that it's in choke and <<60% efficient, which equates to high IAT's and lots of exhaust pressure. Consider at least a 70 mm turbo.
Old 04-13-2009, 10:14 PM
  #15  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Too small. That's a 61 mm turbo. Most folks say a 76 mm is too small for the ls1. Plot it on the compressor map and you'd see that it's in choke and <<60% efficient, which equates to high IAT's and lots of exhaust pressure. Consider at least a 70 mm turbo.
ouch! thanks for the info though... exactly the stuff I wanted to know though. So on that note... what would be the smallest GT series turbo that can be used? GT37? GT40? and what a/r am I looking at?
Old 04-13-2009, 10:23 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thumpstick
ouch! thanks for the info though... exactly the stuff I wanted to know though. So on that note... what would be the smallest GT series turbo that can be used? GT37? GT40? and what a/r am I looking at?
The smallest I would consider would be a GT4094R. At 8 psi boost on an LS1, it's about 65% efficient and not in choke.
Old 04-14-2009, 10:33 AM
  #17  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
The smallest I would consider would be a GT4094R. At 8 psi boost on an LS1, it's about 65% efficient and not in choke.
This is what I found for the GT4094R, I think I got the 8 psi on the comp. map correct (let me know if I don't). My next question is which of the four turbine options would be best for my application?

Old 04-14-2009, 03:06 PM
  #18  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thumpstick
This is what I found for the GT4094R, I think I got the 8 psi on the comp. map correct (let me know if I don't). My next question is which of the four turbine options would be best for my application?
Looks good-ish. Definitely go with the largest AR available. The GT40 is borderline too small so exhaust pressures will be high to begin with. The largest AR will help bring that down.
Old 04-15-2009, 09:43 AM
  #19  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

TC72 would be almost instant spool. Very compact unit as well, no bigger then a GT35R.
Old 04-15-2009, 11:54 AM
  #20  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
thumpstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: clemson / charleston SC
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
TC72 would be almost instant spool. Very compact unit as well, no bigger then a GT35R.
Really? Where can I find some info on this turbo/how much will it run me? That would be perfect since packaging is also a bit of an issue for my build.


Quick Reply: single GT35R?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.