Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

TC78 vs T76?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2009, 01:37 PM
  #21  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hey Moe,

I honestly don't know. It should make more than the previous setup at the same boost levels. I think that you will make the number in tq, but anything I predict about how it would act up top would be a guess to be honest. My gut tells me that the exhaust housing and those cubes may not be a match made in heaven. Having the most free flowing exhaust would be a plus and would help it out up there.

I'm interested to hear how it will turn out.
Old 08-06-2009, 02:41 PM
  #22  
9 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by moehorsepower
Gotcha, Frost do you think I will hit my mark of 750-800 Rwhp with my set up? as follows: Remember that it made 648 RWHP on Pump with 12 lbs and 722 RWHP with the fast gas at 14lbs

Engine: 383 LT4
Heads: LT4 Ported
Intake: LT4
T/B: 58mm
Compression:9:5:1
Cam: 23X-23X/ 588-588 on a 114 LSA.
Tranny: M63
T-76 with a T4 flange and a .96 AR
The only problem I see is that cam looks a little big for that turbo. Something around 218~220 @.050'' might be a better match unless you plan on a larger turbo in the near future.
Old 08-06-2009, 03:01 PM
  #23  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike13
I'm confused What makes a TC76? Also modular turbo calls it a MC76? Is it a good turbo for 600rwhp?
Go to the Turbonetics website. Go to the HP76 turbo. That's a "T76" with the regular "S Series" compressor cover. They even have a compressor map for that turbo...that's the "standard" T76 Turbonetics turbo. Turbonetics calls it the HP76....not T76...but it's the same thing.

Now take that HP76 turbo and remove the S series compressor cover and the backing plate. Machine a custom backing plate and add the smaller 60 series compressor cover....now it's a "TC76" turbo. Still has the HP76 guts in it.

TC76 is just an HP76 with a smaller 60 series compressor cover for packaging.

Now to add confusion...you can take a HP76 turbo...take off the standard S series compressor cover and add the larger race GTM Compressor cover for even more power....but it's a biggg cover and needs plenty of clearance.

GTM Race Cover 76 turbo > HP76 turbo > TC76 turbo
Old 08-07-2009, 10:59 PM
  #24  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

^ That is one of the more helpful posts I've seen regarding this.
Old 08-10-2009, 06:30 AM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stock48
The only problem I see is that cam looks a little big for that turbo. Something around 218~220 @.050'' might be a better match unless you plan on a larger turbo in the near future.
I almost went with a cam in that range but I feared that it would max out at around 5000 or so. My supercharger setup had a 230-244/602-612 cam and pulled to app 5800..




Originally Posted by Frost
Hey Moe,

I honestly don't know. It should make more than the previous setup at the same boost levels. I think that you will make the number in tq, but anything I predict about how it would act up top would be a guess to be honest. My gut tells me that the exhaust housing and those cubes may not be a match made in heaven. Having the most free flowing exhaust would be a plus and would help it out up there.

I'm interested to hear how it will turn out.
I will surely let you know. got 8 pistons in the hole so far. Have a long way to go..Changing out the K-member, New wiring Harness,ect and not knowing what surprises I will run into on the install....
Old 08-10-2009, 08:31 AM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
mike13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onfire
Go to the Turbonetics website. Go to the HP76 turbo. That's a "T76" with the regular "S Series" compressor cover. They even have a compressor map for that turbo...that's the "standard" T76 Turbonetics turbo. Turbonetics calls it the HP76....not T76...but it's the same thing.

Now take that HP76 turbo and remove the S series compressor cover and the backing plate. Machine a custom backing plate and add the smaller 60 series compressor cover....now it's a "TC76" turbo. Still has the HP76 guts in it.

TC76 is just an HP76 with a smaller 60 series compressor cover for packaging.

Now to add confusion...you can take a HP76 turbo...take off the standard S series compressor cover and add the larger race GTM Compressor cover for even more power....but it's a biggg cover and needs plenty of clearance.

GTM Race Cover 76 turbo > HP76 turbo > TC76 turbo
What kind of power potential does the TC76 have?
Old 08-11-2009, 08:26 AM
  #27  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
omore001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike13
What kind of power potential does the TC76 have?
Some claim to have put down just over 700rwhp on a rear mounted 347 LS1 with a TC-76. I know of a built awd 5.3L silverado with a front mount kit putting down 680rwhp on a TC-76 @ 14 psi.
Old 08-11-2009, 09:44 AM
  #28  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by omore001
Some claim to have put down just over 700rwhp on a rear mounted 347 LS1 with a TC-76. I know of a built awd 5.3L silverado with a front mount kit putting down 680rwhp on a TC-76 @ 14 psi.
TJ has made more then that, Also Josh from KYTP, and several others are all in the 700-800rwhp range. I think TJ has made over 800rwhp with his TC unit but I could be wrong.
Old 08-11-2009, 03:27 PM
  #29  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Yes we have crested 800 to the tires though 22" wheels @20psi. That was with a good bit of back pressure on a 370, so yes it can be done.

We made 655 @14 psi on the same truck on the pump gas tune with the 22" wheels.

We never dyno'd it with the TC78, 1.15 a/r but it traps the same mph now on 15psi as it did before at 19.
Old 08-11-2009, 03:28 PM
  #30  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Yes we have crested 800 to the tires though 22" wheels @20psi. That was with a good bit of back pressure on a 370, so yes it can be done.

We made 655 @14 psi on the same truck on the pump gas tune with the 22" wheels.

We never dyno'd it with the TC78, 1.15 a/r but it traps the same mph now on 15psi as it did before at 19.

LOL...new meaning to Fast DUB's
Old 08-12-2009, 06:13 AM
  #31  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Well this sounds a little more encouraging, I was getting a little depressed. But I dont think I will make my mark of the 850 RWHP I was hoping for, I might have to settle for hopefully 750 RWHP...Dam!
Old 08-12-2009, 02:20 PM
  #32  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
omore001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by moehorsepower
Well this sounds a little more encouraging, I was getting a little depressed. But I dont think I will make my mark of the 850 RWHP I was hoping for, I might have to settle for hopefully 750 RWHP...Dam!
Well, if you have the space for it, and you can deal with and a little extra lag, you can always look at the Borg Warner units S400 to meet and exceed your 850rwhp goal. I have been stuck between a nicely done TC78 or a BW S400-80/ ST-80 (similarly priced). Hard choosing between more lag with the Borg or quick spool but lower rev limit with the TC. The TC78 is a dream in terms of power output, compact and light, and very affordable, it just doesn't let me spin the motor as high as I intend to. I keep hearing the TC will be peak out start dying out before 6K on my 370. With my 232/240 115lsa cam, I might be forced to deal with some lag on the S400 to be able to spin my set-up as I intended.
Old 08-13-2009, 06:07 AM
  #33  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by omore001
Well, if you have the space for it, and you can deal with and a little extra lag, you can always look at the Borg Warner units S400 to meet and exceed your 850rwhp goal. I have been stuck between a nicely done TC78 or a BW S400-80/ ST-80 (similarly priced). Hard choosing between more lag with the Borg or quick spool but lower rev limit with the TC. The TC78 is a dream in terms of power output, compact and light, and very affordable, it just doesn't let me spin the motor as high as I intend to. I keep hearing the TC will be peak out start dying out before 6K on my 370. With my 232/240 115lsa cam, I might be forced to deal with some lag on the S400 to be able to spin my set-up as I intended.
Thanks for the info, The only thing is I already have the turbo, and I thought it was going to be a simple swap, Pull the supercharger and install the turbo, But so far its been a major bill, Had to have the motor completely rebuilt, needed a tubular K-member for better clearance, need new fans, and a bunch of parts that the turbo shop ripped me off for ect....
Old 08-16-2009, 03:06 AM
  #34  
9 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Your best bet would be to go to a t78 with a F1 turbine wheel and a 1.15 a/r. A tc78 vs. a t76 would be pretty close. The TC's smaller cover does not flow as well as you bigger cover. If you have room the GTM cover with a 78mm wheel would give you another 100+ hp.
Ok recap. I was mixed up, I thought the TC turbo had the larger cover, and the T series was smaller I currently have the small cover TC76, .96AR, P trim wheel. Im wanting to try the T78, 1.15AR, S, or F1 wheel like you said. Could that swap be worth a couple tenths on a low sec truck?
Old 12-13-2009, 10:37 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
00Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ODESSA, TX
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Price on GTM cover?
Price on 1.15 ar?



Quick Reply: TC78 vs T76?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.