Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Boost with 11:1 compression ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2010, 01:59 AM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I wouldn't bother changing heads or cam just yet. I would bolt it on like it is. Get a good safe tune in there and hang on. You'll probably need to upgrade your fuel system a good bit, but I don't know what you currently have.
Old 05-07-2010, 01:15 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
97ta383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ I may do that and just build a motor on the side im not sure yet im going to try and start all this near the winter time cause i dont drive the car as much then. The kit from epp comes with injectors and a in tank fuel pump. Would be anything else i would need? If i stick with the motor i have now ill only be runing 8 maybe 10psi if i get meth and if a build a low compression motor ill be shooting for 800+rwhp and some 9sec timeslips.
Old 06-15-2010, 11:17 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
DevonsZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: J.C.
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I ran 10lbs with 11.3cr on 93oct & meth just fine.
Old 06-15-2010, 08:17 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you can afford to purchase a Procharger kit you can likely afford a new set of pistons and rods. While it will be a major pain, you will likely be happier in the long run and be able to run more boost.

You could gain major power with a nitrous set-up - with the forged pistons already in place you could get there safely now for a lot less money.
Old 08-03-2013, 03:15 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
 
Knight-Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: san antonio
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im planning on doing the same thing here , i have a set of prc 227 heads milled 10k and comp ratio is 11.1 i plan on buying a twin turbo kit and was worried about the compression ratio

but from what ive gathered here running low boost and a meth kit would be ok untill i build the lower end
Old 08-04-2013, 11:37 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
maxgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You'll be fine with 14psi, E85 and intercooler.
The following users liked this post:
UpstateZ28 (11-08-2023)
Old 03-21-2017, 05:04 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
1994silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Compression

Can I run twin turbos on a5.3 with tr227/224 cam running 11.1 compression on pump gas if a have and intercooler?
Old 03-21-2017, 05:26 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
imma_stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,154
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1994silverado
Can I run twin turbos on a5.3 with tr227/224 cam running 11.1 compression on pump gas if a have and intercooler?
Yes do it ASAP




Old 03-21-2017, 09:32 PM
  #29  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TTI George
I've done this on a car we built for the Pinks all out in Seattle. The most boost I could run with C16 and 11 to 1 compression was 8 psi. Anything more and it would pressurized the cooling system and push water out. At first we thought it may be the gaskets because they had felpro mls and arp bolts so I changed it to GM with arp studs and same thing at just 8 psi. I had the timing at 24 degrees. The car ran well, 10.40 @ 138 but we wanted more. I'm in the process of changing the heads to a cnc ported 73cc chamber and we'll see what happens, should have it back on the dyno next week. G
I'm guessing a timing change could have made a big difference on that combo.
Old 03-22-2017, 06:20 AM
  #30  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Bob@BruteSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Roanoke, IN
Posts: 21,001
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gametech
I'm guessing a timing change could have made a big difference on that combo.
I was thinking the same thing. Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076

PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com

https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Old 03-22-2017, 10:21 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
 
tblentrprz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,080
Received 177 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TTI George
I've done this on a car we built for the Pinks all out in Seattle. The most boost I could run with C16 and 11 to 1 compression was 8 psi. Anything more and it would pressurized the cooling system and push water out. At first we thought it may be the gaskets because they had felpro mls and arp bolts so I changed it to GM with arp studs and same thing at just 8 psi. I had the timing at 24 degrees. The car ran well, 10.40 @ 138 but we wanted more. I'm in the process of changing the heads to a cnc ported 73cc chamber and we'll see what happens, should have it back on the dyno next week. G
How did you decide on 24*? Did you start at 10* and move up? Have you verified commanded = actual (mechanical) timing? How much timing do you pull around peak torque? How wide is your peak torque window? Might want to check piston height at TDC to see if any rods got bent (piston down in hole more than expected).
Old 03-22-2017, 12:28 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
kbracing96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sutherlin OR
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You guys realize this threat has been brought back from the dead TWICE now! And the post that's been quoted and commented on is from 2010!!!!
Old 03-22-2017, 12:50 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
 
tblentrprz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,080
Received 177 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Now ya tell me! Thanks for waking me up. Is it Wednesday yet?
Old 03-23-2017, 03:22 AM
  #34  
Teching In
 
DKS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

11:1 and you want to run boost?... I would say don't do it..
Old 03-23-2017, 08:40 AM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ScottyBG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bowling Green KY
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

To the guy who revived the thread from the dead (1994silverado), I think 11.1 CR is fine. You just need to tune accordingly. It doesn't matter wither it is a twin turbo or a single, all that matters is boost and IAT, as it relates to being able to tune the engine and make it work well.

There are tons of people that say don't run 11:1 static CR engines with boost on this board. The overlap of the cam does play into this as well, just a little overlap will drop the dynamic CR enough to help out considerably. I wonder how many of these guys that are saying "don't do it" have actually had problems with compression, or who of them that did have problems, actually had a good tune. My personal experience is, I'm running 11.4:1, and 15 psi of boost without problems on E70, and making over 700 wheel on an unlocked auto. I'm sure I could also make it work on pump 93 with a big shot of methanol too. Would I get there without either ethanol or methanol?, probably not, but in this world one of those 2 options are available to just about everyone.

My thought is that a considerable portion of these people shootin' down the moderate CR, are just repeating what they have read somewhere else and have never actually tried tuning an engine such as 1994silverado's setup at the 11:1 range. I'm not advocating 12:1 or 13:1 engines here, but turbo engines don't need to be the 8.5:1 they used to be 30 years ago.

As far as the TTIGeorge engine, no one should use that as an example IMO. I know people running higher compression than that on C16, making 1200+ rwhp on 23+lbs of boost. I'd think that George's engine had the wrong plug in it, or the intercooler was poor, or another problem he didn't have sorted out. Obviously the timing has been mentioned, running NA timing on a FI motor doesn't work well either.

Last edited by ScottyBG; 03-23-2017 at 01:20 PM.
Old 03-23-2017, 11:14 AM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Cwarta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Elm Creek, NE
Posts: 1,796
Received 57 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

11:1 here, just got my combo together. Billet 78/75 from vs racing. Drives out of boost just as wonderfully as it did when it was running mid 11's n/a. Extremely responsive and spool up is lighting quick. Very very pleased with my decision to go with the higher compression. Track times and dyno numbers soon, waiting on my new ptc converter.
Old 03-23-2017, 11:49 AM
  #37  
Teching In
 
hillshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 33
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cwarta
11:1 here, just got my combo together. Billet 78/75 from vs racing. Drives out of boost just as wonderfully as it did when it was running mid 11's n/a. Extremely responsive and spool up is lighting quick. Very very pleased with my decision to go with the higher compression. Track times and dyno numbers soon, waiting on my new ptc converter.
Also 11:1 here. running meth with a big intercooler. 57/62 twins on a 418CI motor. runs great so far and made 808HP on pump and 1014 on race gas.
Old 03-23-2017, 12:02 PM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

10.8:1CR and 16psi with 93 + meth with a single turbo... 16 degrees time up top.
Old 03-23-2017, 01:35 PM
  #39  
10 Second Club
 
dw456post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 833
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Mine is LS3 block, TF225 heads, stock GM gaskets, 10.8 compression, 10-11# boost with a Magnuson TVS2300--for a lot of miles and many drag passes. Very easy to tune. 93 octane, No meth.
Old 03-23-2017, 02:15 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Cwarta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Elm Creek, NE
Posts: 1,796
Received 57 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

What kinda max timing and peak tq timing are you guys running? Mines baby soft right now, 5# and 13* on e85 right now haha. Had to upgrade my fuel system before I opened it up. Looking to be around 15# and 15* total soon.


Quick Reply: Boost with 11:1 compression ratio



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.