Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Widening ring gaps???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 07:40 PM
  #41  
atomic 6's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 311
Likes: 3
From: Omaha,Ne
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
So what causes #7 to go boom on a stock ls1 shortblock that was tune to 10.5:1 afr, 13 degrees of timing, no KR and 14psi of boost at 6500rpm?

Post a log of that run, if you have one.

what fuel was run?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 11:56 PM
  #42  
skinnies's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 4
From: KS
Default

Originally Posted by atomic 6
Post a log of that run, if you have one.

what fuel was run?
I'll bet pump gas
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 06:00 AM
  #43  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

It was pump gas, 93. It let go on the highway in 4th gear at about 4000 rpm. Unfortunately, I had my laptop connected and sitting next to me, but forgot to turn the data logging back on, but I have more than 2 dozen logs of runs showing no knock.

I had the rear steam vents on the heads blocked off as I was using a FAST 90 intake, so I'm sure that cylinder got hot.

Are the thickness of the ring lands different on the 5.3l and 4.8l motors than the 5.7 ls1?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 06:06 AM
  #44  
skinnies's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 4
From: KS
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
It was pump gas, 93. It let go on the highway in 4th gear at about 4000 rpm. Unfortunately, I had my laptop connected and sitting next to me, but forgot to turn the data logging back on, but I have more than 2 dozen logs of runs showing no knock.

I had the rear steam vents on the heads blocked off as I was using a FAST 90 intake, so I'm sure that cylinder got hot.

Are the thickness of the ring lands different on the 5.3l and 4.8l motors than the 5.7 ls1?
bolded the problems that probably caused it
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 06:16 AM
  #45  
Sarg's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 3
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Skinnies, do you guys run steam tubes to all 4 corners in your motors?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 06:33 AM
  #46  
skinnies's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 4
From: KS
Default

Yes I use the factory fbody 4 corner one
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #47  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

Well, pump gas is all I have available, but in an attempt to keep it cool, I'm going to vent all four corners back to the radiator, go with a cooler t-stat, and go with Evans waterless coolant.

I could also go with methanol/water injection as well to help keep the pistons cooler.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 04:24 PM
  #48  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 9
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
It was pump gas, 93. It let go on the highway in 4th gear at about 4000 rpm. Unfortunately, I had my laptop connected and sitting next to me, but forgot to turn the data logging back on, but I have more than 2 dozen logs of runs showing no knock.

I had the rear steam vents on the heads blocked off as I was using a FAST 90 intake, so I'm sure that cylinder got hot.

Are the thickness of the ring lands different on the 5.3l and 4.8l motors than the 5.7 ls1?
Same thickness, the 1.2mm rings have a tad thicker land due to the thinner ring. You can NEVER trust pump gas. Just because it says 91 or 93 doesn't mean it's not 87 or worse. Whenever pushing a stock engine you are taking a gamble with pump gas. E85 is offers sooo many benifites. Sucks it's 4hrs away from me.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 04:45 PM
  #49  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

Originally Posted by stock48
Same thickness, the 1.2mm rings have a tad thicker land due to the thinner ring. You can NEVER trust pump gas. Just because it says 91 or 93 doesn't mean it's not 87 or worse. Whenever pushing a stock engine you are taking a gamble with pump gas. E85 is offers sooo many benifites. Sucks it's 4hrs away from me.
Before you go there with the gasoline statements, I used to work for Sunoco as a formulation chemist and would do spot checks testing as well at pumps. It's big big penalties if you don't meet the minimum requirements of octane ratings at the pumps. It's why most refineries actually formulate the gas almost a full point higher in most cases to avoid issues at the pumps.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 06:14 PM
  #50  
Vetal's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 2
From: Latvia
Default

quick question, I had to use 2nd ring with .04" gap in one of the cylinders, will it cause any real problems (besides higher oil consumption)?

Last edited by Vetal; Dec 10, 2013 at 01:39 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 08:02 PM
  #51  
X-Bomb Racing's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
quick question, I had to use 2nd ring with .004" gap in one of the cylinders, will it cause any real problems (besides higher oil consumption)?
Your kidding right?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 01:27 AM
  #52  
Vetal's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 2
From: Latvia
Default

Originally Posted by X-Bomb Racing
Your kidding right?
Yes, sorry Meant .04", not .004

Last edited by Vetal; Dec 10, 2013 at 01:40 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 07:25 AM
  #53  
a4ls2goat's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Default

800whp here. 144mph trap @ 4000lbs on a 4.8.
Stock ring gaps. E85...
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 08:22 AM
  #54  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1,022
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Ran 8s as well, not making near the power some of these other guys are though. JY 2001 5.3, 24lbs E85 fuel. Gapped .024 .028. Had some blow-by Nothing horrible.

Bottom line is you have no idea what the rings are at unless u check. It is a gamble. My 160k motor had a top ring gaps as small as .018. (i believe someone was into the motor at one point as well)

Its pretty simple and easy to pull one and check for peace of mind IMO. Then again while your there might as well Gap them. Just dont over gap.

.006 x bore is pretty standard boost ring gap. So .022 should be good for a 5.3, which seems to be around what most high mileage motors are.

Last edited by Forcefed86; Dec 10, 2013 at 11:49 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 08:46 AM
  #55  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 9
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
Before you go there with the gasoline statements, I used to work for Sunoco as a formulation chemist and would do spot checks testing as well at pumps. It's big big penalties if you don't meet the minimum requirements of octane ratings at the pumps. It's why most refineries actually formulate the gas almost a full point higher in most cases to avoid issues at the pumps.
I guess it must depend on where you are because I have seen otherwise. All it takes is one bad tank and you're done on a 14 psi boost pump gas deal. I run pump/meth in my truck and have never blown an engine due to the gas because Im really in tune with things, but several times I could have. I have had tanks of fuel that I can hear ping on 12 psi and otheres that will take 16psi....
On a side note I just pulled apart a 140k lq4 that had .024" ring gap, and a 34k mile 6.2L L92 that had .014" gap....
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #56  
ButchB's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
.006 x bore is pretty standard boost ring gap. So .022 should be good for a 5.3, which seems to be around what most high mileage motors are.
Good info, thanks
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 09:58 AM
  #57  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

Originally Posted by stock48
I guess it must depend on where you are because I have seen otherwise. All it takes is one bad tank and you're done on a 14 psi boost pump gas deal. I run pump/meth in my truck and have never blown an engine due to the gas because Im really in tune with things, but several times I could have. I have had tanks of fuel that I can hear ping on 12 psi and otheres that will take 16psi....
On a side note I just pulled apart a 140k lq4 that had .024" ring gap, and a 34k mile 6.2L L92 that had .014" gap....
I agree 100% with what you're saying, and it's the reason I also run meth injection. It's a nice safety factor when on pump gas. I'm also conservative with my tune as well. My motor popped 2 years ago because 1, I had stock pistons and tight rings, 2, I wasn't spraying meth/water yet, 3, I had the rear steam vents blocked, which is a debatable subject if it's a factor or not. I measured my ring gap on number 7, and it was only 0.013 or 0.014, I forget, might have been even tighter.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 01:32 PM
  #58  
Vetal's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 2
From: Latvia
Default

What should I do with .04" 2nd ring gap in one cyl, is it acceptable, or is it critical?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 04:01 PM
  #59  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

Originally Posted by Vetal
What should I do with .04" 2nd ring gap in one cyl, is it acceptable, or is it critical?
Is it right, no, is it critical, that's a tougher question. It all depends on what you consider acceptable.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2013 | 06:34 PM
  #60  
Vetal's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 2
From: Latvia
Default

Haynes manual even says up to .04" is OK, so I guess for mild engine refresh I should be OK. Hell, I found out today that #1 piston head TWO top rings instead of top+2nd. Still worked just the same as other cylinders somehow
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.