"black" intercoolers
What do you have to back statement up with? Any proof?
What percentage of loss are you suggesting as well?
Reason I ask is because no else seems to think its an issue and some have done testing themselves (if you read the others posts, you would have seen this).
You show me a F1, prototype, or any top flight motorsprot intercooler that is painted black. You wont find ANY. They only reason to do it is aesthetics.
As for low speed heat loss, load of crap as the charge air temps will be lower than the intercooler anyway (as they are in a vacuum).
You show me a F1, prototype, or any top flight motorsprot intercooler that is painted black. You wont find ANY. They only reason to do it is aesthetics.
As for low speed heat loss, load of crap as the charge air temps will be lower than the intercooler anyway (as they are in a vacuum).
The vid was fascinating I thought.
Also they didn't stress very much that the black inter cooler was worse (by 3%) when painted black in the simulated use!
Unless you are holding the car in boost on the line you will not heat soak the IC enough.
once again if you want more proof go speak to a radiator / inter cooler manufacturer and see what they say. Cant see Honeywell / Garrett paining in inter coolers cores black myself.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
In the second test they had 1 thermo coupler in each end and two on the outside of the IC. They said something about a mean but never confirmed what they actually meant.
So the test changed (moving the thermo couplers) and from the sounds of it how they calculated the results did to! Looks like a pretty bogus test to me! You can prove what you want when you change how you measure the results and what the results show!
Last edited by hawk584; Jun 20, 2014 at 08:26 PM.







