LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion (https://ls1tech.com/forums/)
-   Forced Induction (https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction-9/)
-   -   228R cam with turbo? (https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/1564724-228r-cam-turbo.html)

ToxicWS6 Jul 12, 2012 11:29 AM

228R cam with turbo?
 
Any one running a 228R cam with 112LSA and a turbo, if so how do they like hit? Would it hurt performance being turboed over a stock cam?

jay_rich Jul 12, 2012 11:38 AM

I hope not bc I spec'd mine out last year and plan on using it for my build. Mine is a tad different tho

228/228 116LSA

Jay

Ryans99ls1 Jul 12, 2012 12:38 PM

mine is slightly bigger than a 228R and on 111+2 LSA. numbers in sig. works just fine

ToxicWS6 Jul 12, 2012 01:33 PM

I was looking at the ms3 but thought bigger the cam worse it "bled" boost off, why i choose 228R, or is ms3 to big

Nitroused383 Jul 12, 2012 03:47 PM

The specs on the 228r cam are about perfect for a 346 street car. I say about because it runs on XER lobes and those are not the most valve train friendly ramp rates. The valve events are great though, basically the bigger brother to the speed inc tu1.

Ryans99ls1 Jul 12, 2012 04:26 PM


Originally Posted by ToxicWS6 (Post 16510777)
I was looking at the ms3 but thought bigger the cam worse it "bled" boost off, why i choose 228R, or is ms3 to big

it will bleed some boost, but if anything itll just help the motor survive a lil longer haha.

ive always been a fun of running more of an 'N/A' cam in a turbo app because i have yet to see a so called 'N/A' cam not do well under boost. if you make good power n/a, add approx 30hp for every psi you plan on running.

my car made 380 before the turbo. then i added 9psi and according to the 30hp/psi it should be around 650, it made 630 which is pretty darn close considering thats a VERY rough estimate. (the cam only numbers were also through a ten bolt, the turbo numbers were through a 9in.. same dyno for both though)

this also why you hear people say just run the cam you have, if you already have one.

id go 228R, it has a better power band than the MS3

87silverbullet Jul 12, 2012 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by ToxicWS6 (Post 16510777)
I was looking at the ms3 but thought bigger the cam worse it "bled" boost off, why i choose 228R, or is ms3 to big

Not necessarily so, It more about the valve events and LSA which makes a cam better for boost.


Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1 (Post 16511342)
it will bleed some boost, but if anything itll just help the motor survive a lil longer haha.

ive always been a fun of running more of an 'N/A' cam in a turbo app because i have yet to see a so called 'N/A' cam not do well under boost. if you make good power n/a, add approx 30hp for every psi you plan on running.

my car made 380 before the turbo. then i added 9psi and according to the 30hp/psi it should be around 650, it made 630 which is pretty darn close considering thats a VERY rough estimate. (the cam only numbers were also through a ten bolt, the turbo numbers were through a 9in.. same dyno for both though)

this also why you hear people say just run the cam you have, if you already have one.

id go 228R, it has a better power band than the MS3

Try running a TSP giant under boost. It will make power but it's not a good cam for boost, yet it runs like crazy N/A and on spray. You will find the more you turn up the boost on a more N/A style cam it will lose more power compared to a correctly spec's turbo cam.

Ryans99ls1 Jul 12, 2012 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by 87silverbullet (Post 16511471)


Try running a TSP giant under boost. It will make power but it's not a good cam for boost, yet it runs like crazy N/A and on spray. You will find the more you turn up the boost on a more N/A style cam it will lose more power compared to a correctly spec's turbo cam.

i dont doubt that one bit. starting out though, theres almost no reason to go through a cam swap. most people running the giant still probably have a stock bottom end, so they wont be able turn the boost up too high anyway. and if they were building a motor for boost, youd be crazy to go with a giant.

i was more referring to those of us who go from h/c to turbo and that we shouldnt really shy away from n/a cams at that level because its not really worth the effort. the car is gonna make more than enough power.

when going through the hassle of building a motor, by all means get a turbo cam spec'd

I8UR4RD Jul 12, 2012 11:03 PM

that cam is not perfect for boost, but it does a damn good job. i used it with my d1 and 346 and made great power. its also a great DD N/A. mine was 114lsa though. 393rwhp NA before better fuel and UD pulley.

35thcamaross is another guy i know with boost and that cam. and no probs with that cam at all.

87silverbullet Jul 13, 2012 08:06 AM


Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1 (Post 16511562)
starting out though, theres almost no reason to go through a cam swap. most people running the giant still probably have a stock bottom end, so they wont be able turn the boost up too high anyway.

Not so. There are guys here pushing crazy amounts of boost on these stock motors and were not talking about one or two guys. If there are guys who are running minimal amounts of boost its because they are afraid to turn it up to break something but we all know if the tune is right it will live. So put in a good cam, turn up the boost and have fun.

I8UR4RD Jul 13, 2012 06:32 PM

yeah as mentioned....the camaro I was talking about is making 11 lbs of boost with the 228, and making 668rwhp. seems like he's running a 4.x pulley, and still has the ability to go all the way down to the 3.4



ToxicWS6 Jul 17, 2012 02:01 PM

Sorry for delayed response but thanks guys! Sounds like u can do alot with stockshort block with n/a cam, excited to get this build done

JoshuaGrooms83 Aug 20, 2012 03:09 AM

what would be the difference between 224r or a 224/228 with boost? i know the lift is abit more on the 228 but how does that effect in boost mode?

JoshuaGrooms83 Sep 10, 2012 10:56 AM

definitly would like to hear more peoples results with this cam

Strokinit383 Sep 10, 2012 01:41 PM

I am running a 224/228@114. Have yet to get it on the dyno, but am in to see others results as well.

***Edit... Just checked the pics from my build and I was mistaken. Its 224/230@114. Comp cams XER273HR-14***

bmf5150 Sep 10, 2012 03:04 PM

I got a 228r 114lsa,getting ready to put kenne bell on!

JoshuaGrooms83 Sep 21, 2012 09:29 AM

im thinking im gonna go witht he 228 cam. about 75% sure

35thsscamaro02 Sep 21, 2012 12:19 PM

as mentioned earlier im running speed incs SI4 cam works great for me 4.25 blower pulley
SI4 228228 .588.588 113

JoshuaGrooms83 Sep 21, 2012 12:26 PM

nice, believe im at 98% sure now lol. only think that would convince me of getting a slightly smaller size is if those are significantly cheaper lol

lsxTAlemy Sep 22, 2012 02:03 PM

i have the ms3 and im going to have to try it on boost. there's not much info on it not sure if to go turbo or charged yet tho. 600+ hp is good enough for me...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands