Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Twin 67 5.3?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2012, 12:30 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
Car came on strong low but I would say full boost in the 4500+rpm range.



Above runs stopped due to lack of fuel @5800ish rpm(93 oct-12 degrees of timing-11.5psi-afr 205's-trak cam-stock 5.7 bottom end-fast 90)

Didn't DRAG/TRACK race this setup so couldn't give you a track opinion. Worked very well on the street though.
So you never hit full boost until almost 6000rpms? And you say it worked well on the street......compared to what? No offense, but that graph looks horrible.
"Full boost" is the entire amount of boost you have it set to, you did not reach it in the 4500 range because it was still rising past that. At 4500 you were at about 9si, which is not full boost.

Last edited by pwrtrip75; 11-21-2012 at 12:36 PM.
Old 11-21-2012, 01:16 PM
  #22  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Frisco/Wylie
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

When I see a boost curve like that, typically, the compressor is oversized, or the turbine housing is too large.

More load, and itll come into boost quicker, so dyno vs street, are probably two different animals, but its not optimal, unless you plan to, again, spin big RPM.
Old 11-21-2012, 03:42 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

2.73 gears,..street race'd..35mph stab and go on a radial,..it was hard to beat on the street. Like I said, it worked great on the street,...especially against liter bikes.
Old 11-21-2012, 03:43 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

..fyi,..I had 7psi springs in the wastegates.....which didn't hold,..hence the boost rise-

Wastegates were replaced from turbosmart 38mm's to TiAL 44's a week after the dyno.

running more cubes now-
Old 11-21-2012, 03:50 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bttlfed98gt
What did the rx-7 make with the 76? And what trans?
855rwhp with glide, but thru the 9" and 33" tires. Some day I'll strap down the ltd(same combo) and see what it'll make turned up, I'd be shocked if it didn't make 900 plus rwhp.
Old 11-21-2012, 03:53 PM
  #26  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,293
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by pwrtrip75
So you never hit full boost until almost 6000rpms? And you say it worked well on the street......compared to what? No offense, but that graph looks horrible.
"Full boost" is the entire amount of boost you have it set to, you did not reach it in the 4500 range because it was still rising past that. At 4500 you were at about 9si, which is not full boost.
compared to his 615 rwhp Procharged setup he ran previously with the same 346/H/C/I setup. The TT setup had WAY more useable boost than the Procharger.

Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
..fyi,..I had 7psi springs in the wastegates.....which didn't hold,..hence the boost rise-

Wastegates were replaced from turbosmart 38mm's to TiAL 44's a week after the dyno.

running more cubes now-
this^^^

It reached gate spring pressure at 4000 rpm. The rest was creep

Horrible looking or not, the car flat our performed on the street, and as mentioned, from a 35 MPH roll in 2nd gear it felt like it was going to slow the rotation of the earth, and this was on a 346 combo that was not 'designed' for boost (wrong cam, lol).
Old 11-21-2012, 04:18 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

lol..gotta love those "nooo boost" camshafts.
Old 11-21-2012, 05:04 PM
  #28  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Frisco/Wylie
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

gate pressure of 7 psi @ 4000, on a 5.7, is still way up there.

What was turbine housing size? and what exact 67mm turbo was it?
Old 11-21-2012, 05:37 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
bttlfed98gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Doesn't sound too promising
Old 11-21-2012, 07:24 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Louis
gate pressure of 7 psi @ 4000, on a 5.7, is still way up there.

What was turbine housing size? and what exact 67mm turbo was it?


Precision 68/69

.70 ar compressor
i wanna say maybe .81 exhaust but dont remember fosho.
Old 11-21-2012, 10:01 PM
  #31  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike@Diablosport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,293
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Didn't the car have the 3.42s when we dyno'd it?

The entire car changed when it went to 2.73s....

Not sure how/if that would affect the spool time on the dyno.
Old 11-21-2012, 11:14 PM
  #32  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Frisco/Wylie
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Oh yes, big difference. Load=energy that the turbos turn into boost. Like the boost in 2nd gear vs 5th, big difference!
Old 11-21-2012, 11:37 PM
  #33  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
bttlfed98gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the car will have 28" DR with 3.27 an a M12 6 speed. Hopefully itll come in arnd 4500-5000 with a good turbo cam and 10.2 :1, 5.3l
Old 11-23-2012, 11:42 AM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport
Didn't the car have the 3.42s when we dyno'd it?

The entire car changed when it went to 2.73s....

Not sure how/if that would affect the spool time on the dyno.

Yes it did. 3.42's on dyno... broke the diff on the street, had the 2.73 chunk laying around, swapped parts, made it work,...and honestly, really much more happy with the car with the 2.73 setup at least on the street I am. Long gears...lots of load and a lot less shifts.



Quick Reply: Twin 67 5.3?'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.